Downloads & Free Reading Options - Results

Performance Of Reading by Peter Kivy

Read "Performance Of Reading" by Peter Kivy through these free online access and download options.

Search for Downloads

Search by Title or Author

Books Results

Source: The Internet Archive

The internet Archive Search Results

Available books for downloads and borrow from The internet Archive

1CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80-01826r000400100039-9: PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE EXEMPTION FOR CIA FROM THE PERFORMANCE RATING ACT OF 1950

By

No Description

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80-01826r000400100039-9: PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE EXEMPTION FOR CIA FROM THE PERFORMANCE RATING ACT OF 1950” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80-01826r000400100039-9: PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE EXEMPTION FOR CIA FROM THE PERFORMANCE RATING ACT OF 1950
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 18.26 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 12 times, the file-s went public at Fri Oct 20 2023.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Image-Only PDF Metadata JSON - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80-01826r000400100039-9: PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE EXEMPTION FOR CIA FROM THE PERFORMANCE RATING ACT OF 1950 at online marketplaces:


2CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80b01500r000100030014-6: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF COLLECTION PERFORMANCE AGAINST NGA WARSAW PACT GROUND FORCE UNITS AND SELECTED INSTALLATIONS

By

oved For Release-2000/08/30 : CI U60601601 50OR000100030014-6 DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY S-33,064/DC-3C DIA 25X1 ! TO: 0 For Conventional Forces MBFR 17 May 1974 SUBJECT: Criteria for Evaluation of Collection Performance against NGA Warsaw Pact Ground Force Units and Selected Installations 1. (U) Reference discussion held on 8 May 1974 regarding first draft, this subject. 2. (S) The enclosed is a second and complete draft of the scoring criteria and target list discussed during our referenced meeting. I have coordinated this material with responsible production elements of DIA(DI-3) and CIA(OSR). NSA and NPIC have not been involved up to this point. 3. (S) I suggest that this material be forwarded through your office for review and action by NSA and NPIC and for the information of State and ACDA. I suggest a meeting be called to iron out any problems and clarify any technical or administrative details. Copies of this material have already been provided the appropriate CIA and DIA analytical elements. 4. (S) For your information, DIA is now implementing the criteria and instructions contained herein. CIA/OSR plans to further scrutinize the target list to insure the soundness of the sample from a statistical analysis point of view. The results of that CIA/OSR review will possibly also be available for the -May meeting. 30 ell // 1 Enclosure JAMES R. HAYS 2nd Draft (S) / Chairman, MBFR Monitoring Capabilities Study DIA DECLASSIFICATION/RELEASE DIA(DC-3) Extension 11-45851 DECISIONS ON FILE Secure 2553 Clas>i ied by _____ti!- ------------- SUBJECT TO GENERAL DECLASSIFICATION :I-IEI)ULE OF EXECUTIVE ORLOER 1 0>1 AUTui' !ATi(;ALLY DOV NGRADE=D Ai' 'I'YJO YEAR INTERVALS DECLASSIFIED 0A 31 DECEMBER Approved For Release 2000/08/30 l l P80 130 1500 R000100030014-6

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80b01500r000100030014-6: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF COLLECTION PERFORMANCE AGAINST NGA WARSAW PACT GROUND FORCE UNITS AND SELECTED INSTALLATIONS” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80b01500r000100030014-6: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF COLLECTION PERFORMANCE AGAINST NGA WARSAW PACT GROUND FORCE UNITS AND SELECTED INSTALLATIONS
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 0.89 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 19 times, the file-s went public at Sat Oct 07 2023.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Image-Only PDF Metadata JSON - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80b01500r000100030014-6: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF COLLECTION PERFORMANCE AGAINST NGA WARSAW PACT GROUND FORCE UNITS AND SELECTED INSTALLATIONS at online marketplaces:


3ERIC ED012213: READING PERFORMANCE OF ELEMENTARY STUDENT TEACHERS IN A DEVELOPING INSTITUTION.

By

A STUDY WAS CONDUCTED AT BISHOP COLLEGE, DALLAS, TEXAS, TO EXAMINE THE READING NEEDS OF PROSPECTIVE ELEMENTARY TEACHERS. SCORES ON THE NELSON DENNY READING TESTS, ADVANCED FORM A, ON THE OTIS QUICK SCORING TESTS OF MENTAL ABILITY, GAMMA FORM BM, AND GRADE POINT AVERAGES COVERING 4 YEARS OF COLLEGE WORK WERE ANALYZED FOR 29 NEGRO ELEMENTARY STUDENT TEACHERS. APPROXIMATELY ONE THIRD OF THE SUBJECTS WERE IN THE 30-40 AGE RANGE, AND TWO-THIRDS WERE LESS THAN 25 YEARS OLD. RESULTS INDICATED THAT THE MEAN TOTAL GRADE EQUIVALENT ON THE NELSON DENNY READING TEST FOR THE SAMPLE GROUP TESTED WAS SUFFICIENTLY BELOW THAT OF THE NORMATIVE POPULATION TO JUSTIFY THE ELEMENTARY STUDENT TEACHERS' NEED FOR READING IMPROVEMENT. THE CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS BETWEEN SCORES WAS NOT SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO STATE THAT THESE STUDENT TEACHERS READ AT LEVELS COMMENSURATE WITH THEIR IQ, OR THAT THEIR GRADE POINT AVERAGES WERE COMMENSURATE WITH THEIR READING PERFORMANCE. VARIABLES SUCH AS AGE, SIZE OF HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATING CLASS, AND EDUCATION AND OCCUPATION OF PARENTS DID NOT SEEM TO INFLUENCE THE READING SCORES OF THE SUBJECTS. A SIMILAR STUDY WITH 200 SUBJECTS EQUATED ON THE BASIS OF AGE AND INTELLIGENCE IS PLANNED. A REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND REFERENCES ARE INCLUDED. THIS PAPER WAS PRESENTED AT THE NATIONAL READING CONFERENCE ANNUAL MEETING (ST. PETERSBURG, DECEMBER 1, 1966). (RH)

“ERIC ED012213: READING PERFORMANCE OF ELEMENTARY STUDENT TEACHERS IN A DEVELOPING INSTITUTION.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED012213: READING PERFORMANCE OF ELEMENTARY STUDENT TEACHERS IN A DEVELOPING INSTITUTION.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED012213: READING PERFORMANCE OF ELEMENTARY STUDENT TEACHERS IN A DEVELOPING INSTITUTION.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 28.44 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 72 times, the file-s went public at Fri Dec 04 2015.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - JPEG Thumb - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED012213: READING PERFORMANCE OF ELEMENTARY STUDENT TEACHERS IN A DEVELOPING INSTITUTION. at online marketplaces:


4ERIC ED320101: An Investigation Of Crude Literacy, Reading Performance, And Functional Literacy In The United States, 1880 To 1980. Program Report 86-2.

By

Focusing on the problems of validity and representativeness of samples, a study examined the history of literacy in the United States since 1880 in order to set the contemporary debate on test scores, literacy and reading performance in the longer-range perspective of the last 100 years. The quality of the data and the arguments of literacy scholars concerning crude literacy, reading performance, and functional literacy were examined. Results indicated that although the problems of concept validity, representativeness of research samples, and noncomparability across time confuse the attempt to discern trends, three historical trends were identified. These trends are that (1) in the twentieth century, self-reported outright illiteracy almost disappeared as a percentage of the whole population; (2) the big story in twentieth century literacy is the rise in school attainment, not the relative effectiveness of schools to teach children at a particular grade level; and (3) the greatest difficulty was found in making a confident statement about the reading abilities of people at different points in time with the same amount of schooling. Findings suggest that present-day literacy policy should be argued on the basis of an assessment of the current condition and on the basis of shared educational goals and not on the basis of alleged declines or rises in literacy skills. (Five footnotes are included; 15 pages of references, 20 charts, and five appendixes of data are attached.) (RS)

“ERIC ED320101: An Investigation Of Crude Literacy, Reading Performance, And Functional Literacy In The United States, 1880 To 1980. Program Report 86-2.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED320101: An Investigation Of Crude Literacy, Reading Performance, And Functional Literacy In The United States, 1880 To 1980. Program Report 86-2.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED320101: An Investigation Of Crude Literacy, Reading Performance, And Functional Literacy In The United States, 1880 To 1980. Program Report 86-2.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 180.17 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 232 times, the file-s went public at Wed Nov 19 2014.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED320101: An Investigation Of Crude Literacy, Reading Performance, And Functional Literacy In The United States, 1880 To 1980. Program Report 86-2. at online marketplaces:


5ERIC ED509320: The Impacts Of Demographic Factors In Predicting Student Performance On A State Reading Test

By

Background: The overall goal of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 is to close, by the end of the 2013-2014 academic year, "the achievement gap between high- and low- performing students, especially the achievement gap between minority and non-minority students and, between disadvantaged children and their more advantaged peers" (NCLB, 2001, Sec. 1001[3]). Under the federal NCLB mandates, adequate yearly progress (AYP) targets must be set for the entire period from 2002 to 2014 in order to ensure that all students and all schools eventually meet the content and performance standards adopted in their respective states. It was within this context that the Texas Education Agency (TEA) launched its Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) in spring 2003 to improve its accountability system. The accountability provisions in NCLB clearly refer to two demographic variables underlying the current inequity in public education: economic disadvantage and race/ethnicity. It is obvious that the essence of accountability, according to the NCLB, is accountability for subgroups, particularly subgroups that have historically been disadvantaged by their low income and minority statuses. It is therefore important to investigate the extent to which student performance on the 2002-2003 TAKS was determined by economic disadvantage and minority status, so that the Beaumont ISD Superintendent of Schools, School Board members, and the cabinet may have a clear baseline picture by which it can judge how well Beaumont Independent School District schools and students will be leveling the playing field from 2002 up to 2014 to ensure educational equity. Purpose: The objective of the present study was to examine the impact of three demographic variables: poverty, ethnicity, and gender on the risk of a student failing to meet the TAKS reading proficiency standards in 2003. Research Design: Purposeful with four grade levels (3rd, 5th, 8th, and 10th) and three research questions. Study Sample and Setting: Students were drawn from all of the 29 elementary and secondary schools Beaumont ISD. There are 24 (16 elementary, two high, and six middle schools) school-wide Title 1 campuses in BISD. The total sample consisted of 75 teachers (11 male and 64 females) with average cumulative length of service as 12.89 years (minimum was two and maximum was 37 years); and 35%, 15%, and 50% of these teachers were African, Hispanic, and Caucasian Americans respectively. There were a total of 6,112 students in this study: 1,648 third graders, 1,560 fifth graders, 1,502 eight graders, and 1,402 tenth graders. Intervention and Control/Comparison Condition: None. Data Collection and Analysis: Data for this present investigation were collected from the district's database and state's achieves at the campus level namely the Texas state Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) database of the State of TEA for the 2001-2003 school years. Within the TEA database are information about individual students and teachers and campuses. The dependent variable in this study is the binary variable of pass/fail (pass = 1, fail = 0). The event of failure (0) is modeled in logistic regression. Findings: The three-predictor model can correctly classify 65.0%, 64.8%, 64.5%, and 64.8% of the students into the "pass" or "fail" group at grades 3, 5, 8 and 10 respectively. That is, without any consideration to academic capability, roughly 65% of the students' TAKS reading results could be correctly placed. Conclusions: As expected, girls have a significantly lower failure rate than boys in reading across the grade levels, with statistically significant odds ratios of 0.73, 0.61, 0.54 and 0.49 for grades 3, 5, 8 and 10 respectively. The present study is limited by the absence of many other demographic variables that might conceivably have contributed to the failure rates on the 2002-2003 TAKS reading tests. It also faced the methodological challenge of how to include numerous smaller subgroups into the analyses. The predicted probabilities of failure used in classifying the students into the predicted pass and fail groups may be optimistically biased because the predicted results and the actual results are from the same data. Validations using 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 TAKS data are under consideration. (Contains 4 tables.)

“ERIC ED509320: The Impacts Of Demographic Factors In Predicting Student Performance On A State Reading Test” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED509320: The Impacts Of Demographic Factors In Predicting Student Performance On A State Reading Test
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED509320: The Impacts Of Demographic Factors In Predicting Student Performance On A State Reading Test” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 12.61 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 56 times, the file-s went public at Sun Jan 31 2016.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED509320: The Impacts Of Demographic Factors In Predicting Student Performance On A State Reading Test at online marketplaces:


6ERIC ED415484: Effects Of An Integrated Format For Reading Instruction On The Comprehension And Word-Recognition Performance Of Fourth- And Fifth-Grade Students Who Exhibit Severe Reading Problems.

By

A study examined the effectiveness of an integrated language arts instructional format for teaching reading compared with the effectiveness of the typical traditional reading program. The study investigated the effectiveness of approaches that are representative of both viewpoints of the reading process (i.e., word recognition and the construction of meaning) with fourth- and fifth-grade students who, based on their Total Normal Curve Equivalent scores on the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS), exhibited severe reading problems. Subjects were 123 randomly selected students (50 from grade 4 and 80 from grade 5) from a public school system in a small southern town. Of these 123 students, 25 fourth graders and 40 fifth graders were randomly assigned to either the experimental or the control group. Both groups were administered the Interest Reading Inventory (IRI), the Slosson Oral Reading Test (SORT), and the Analytical Reading Inventory (fifth edition) (ARI), Narrative and Expository. Results indicated that the integrated language arts format for reading instruction increased reading comprehension performance and had no significant effect on word recognition performance. Also a relation was found between scores on the DSI and word-recognition performance; however, no relation was found between Dyslexia Screening Instrument (DSI) scores and reading comprehension. Findings suggest that teaching students how to use a variety of comprehension and vocabulary strategies as well as how to monitor their own learning may equip them with effective tools for constructing meaning. (Contains 14 references and 8 tables of data.) (CR)

“ERIC ED415484: Effects Of An Integrated Format For Reading Instruction On The Comprehension And Word-Recognition Performance Of Fourth- And Fifth-Grade Students Who Exhibit Severe Reading Problems.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED415484: Effects Of An Integrated Format For Reading Instruction On The Comprehension And Word-Recognition Performance Of Fourth- And Fifth-Grade Students Who Exhibit Severe Reading Problems.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED415484: Effects Of An Integrated Format For Reading Instruction On The Comprehension And Word-Recognition Performance Of Fourth- And Fifth-Grade Students Who Exhibit Severe Reading Problems.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 24.13 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 105 times, the file-s went public at Wed Dec 23 2015.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED415484: Effects Of An Integrated Format For Reading Instruction On The Comprehension And Word-Recognition Performance Of Fourth- And Fifth-Grade Students Who Exhibit Severe Reading Problems. at online marketplaces:


7CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp78b04770a000700040009-3: PROPOSAL FOR EXTENSION OF RESEARCH ON PHOTOINTERPRETER PERFORMANCE

By

No Description

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp78b04770a000700040009-3: PROPOSAL FOR EXTENSION OF RESEARCH ON PHOTOINTERPRETER PERFORMANCE” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp78b04770a000700040009-3: PROPOSAL FOR EXTENSION OF RESEARCH ON PHOTOINTERPRETER PERFORMANCE
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 4.63 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 16 times, the file-s went public at Mon Mar 11 2024.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Image-Only PDF Metadata JSON - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp78b04770a000700040009-3: PROPOSAL FOR EXTENSION OF RESEARCH ON PHOTOINTERPRETER PERFORMANCE at online marketplaces:


8ERIC ED398550: The Nature Of Children's Motivations For Reading, And Their Relations To Reading Frequency And Reading Performance. Reading Research Report No. 63.

By

A study assessed dimensions of children's reading motivations by giving them a revised version of the Motivations for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ). The MRQ is designed to assess 11 possible dimensions of reading motivations, including reading efficacy, several intrinsic and several extrinsic reading motivations, social aspects of reading, and the desire to avoid reading. Approximately 600 fifth- and sixth-grade children completed the MRQ as part of a larger intervention study designed to increase children's reading comprehension and enjoyment of reading. Analyses of children's responses to the MRQ showed that many of these dimensions can be identified, and measured reliably. Scales based on the different dimensions related positively to one another, and negatively to the desire to avoid reading. Several of the scales related to children's reports of their reading frequency, and to their performance on four measures of reading achievement. (Contains 40 references and 8 tables of data.) (Author/RS)

“ERIC ED398550: The Nature Of Children's Motivations For Reading, And Their Relations To Reading Frequency And Reading Performance. Reading Research Report No. 63.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED398550: The Nature Of Children's Motivations For Reading, And Their Relations To Reading Frequency And Reading Performance. Reading Research Report No. 63.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED398550: The Nature Of Children's Motivations For Reading, And Their Relations To Reading Frequency And Reading Performance. Reading Research Report No. 63.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 34.66 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 122 times, the file-s went public at Tue Dec 15 2015.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - JPEG Thumb - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED398550: The Nature Of Children's Motivations For Reading, And Their Relations To Reading Frequency And Reading Performance. Reading Research Report No. 63. at online marketplaces:


9CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp82-00457r011800290001-3: PERFORMANCE STATISTICS AND OTHER CHARACTERISTICS OF SOVIET PLANES

By

Approved For Release 2006/08/08 : CIA-RDP82-00457R011800290001 ~3 FORK NO. 51-IAA FEB 1952 CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION REPORT COUNTRY Germany (Russian Zone) DO NOT SUBJECT Performance Statistics and Other CLaracteristics of Soviet Planes DATE OF 25X1 INFO. PLACE ACQUIRED 'ULATEDATE DISTR. BY CABLE THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION AFFECTING THE NATIONAL DEFENSE OF THE UNITED STATES, WITHIN THE MEANING OF TITLE IN, SECTIONS 793 AND 794, OF THE U.S. CODE, AS AMENDED. ITS TRANSMISSION OR REVE- LATION OF ITS CONTENTS TO OR RECEIPT BY AN UNAUTHORIZED PERSON IS PROHIBIT 670 km. 25X1 25 25 Type of Plane YAK-9 LA-9 MLG-15* 1Z-10 T[T-2 TU-6 IL-28 (jet)* Tu-4 Type of Plane YAK-9 IAA-9 MIG-15 IL-10 NAVY AIR# IX air Number of Engines Cooling -System one liquid one air SECRET/C ONTROL - U.S.. OFFICIALS ONLY SECURITY INFORMATION THIS IS UNEVALUATED INFORMATION NO. OF PAGES 2 NO. OF ENCLS. (LISTED BELOW) SUPPLEMENT TO REPORT NO. Crew Maximum Seed unknown one liquid two air Armament Load unknown 200 kg. 6oo 3,000 750 1,060 550 Gross Load 3,300 kg. 3,500 " 550 550 goo 670 4,500 1 May 1952 6,000 " SECRET/CONTROL -- U. S. OFFICIALS ONLY OSI Ev x U X1 X1 Approved For Release 2006/08/08 : CIA-RDP82-00457R011800290001-3 Approved For Release 2006/08/08 : CIA-RDP82-00457R011800290001-3 SECRET/CONTROL - U e Ss :.',OFFICIALS ONLY Type of Plane Armament Load Gross Load 3,500 kg. .12,000 kg. TEr-6 3,000 " 12,600 n`. IL.-28 3,000 " 18,000 " r-4 12,000 " 64 Type of Plane Range Climbing Ability Armame nt (probably ceiling), YAK-9 1,300 km. 12,000 m. 1 x 20 mm. cannon , 2 x 12.7 MG's LA-9 1,700 " 12,000 " 4 x 23 mm. cannon MIG-15 1,500 12,000 '" 2 x 23 mm. cannon , 1 x 12.7 mid MG IL-10 800 7,500 2 x 23 mm. cannon and 2 x 7.6 mm MG , 1 x 12.7 mm 's TU-2 2,200 " 10,000 2 x 20 mm. cannon , 3 x 12.7 mm MG 's T[T-6 2,800 " 10:,000 " 2 x 20 mm. cannon , 3 x 12.7 mm. IL-28 2,500 13,000 4 x 23 mm. cannon TU-1+ 6,000 " 12,000 r, 2 x 20 mm. cannon, 10 x 12.7 mm M G's I homment: This information is the first confirmation that the MIG-15 is the official Soviet name and that IL-28 is the designation for the Type 27. SECRET/COrMOL - U.S. OFFICIALS ONLY Approved For Release 2006/08/08 : CIA-RDP82-00457R011800290001-3 Approved For Release 2006/08/08 : CIA-RDP82-00457801.1800290001-3 F ON NO. 51 IAA FEB 1952 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY S R JCON13AL - U.S. Q ICIALS ONLY INFORMATION REPORT REPORT NO. . CD NO. 25X1 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION AFFECTING THE NATIONAL DEFENSE OF THE UNITED STATES, WITHIN THE MEANING OF TITLE 18, SECTIONS 793 AND 794, OF THE U.S. CODE, AS AMENDED. ITS TRANSMISSION OR REVE- LATION OF ITS CONTENTS TO OR RECEIPT BY AN UNAUTHORIZED PERSON IS PROHIBITED BY LAN. THE REPRODUCTION OF THIS FORM IS PROHIBITED. - r LLI9LFI I IV yr JV REPORT NO. THIS IS UNEVALUATED INFORMATION 25X following lines in paragraph 2 should read as follows; lane' 6; page 1 line lie 2 . Iine 7 . pale. 2 9- Plane Number of ] :gines Coaling System T1J-6.. two air Tie of Plane Arta; r1t -Load D of PISS, Clim?lxz Ability probable ceiling) 11IG-15 1,500 500 kta. 15.7000 M, 2 x 23 tmn aanuonr 1 x 12.7 Mm NG CLASS I F I CAT I ON SMW/CONTROL - Ti. S* M 019LY COUNTRY SUBJECT. DATE OF INFO.` NO. OF ENCLS t ermany (Russian zone) - DATE DISTR. 2 May 1952 Ferrormnae statistics and Other Ch raeteristics of Soviet Planes LJL h j ~ NO. OF PAGES PLACE ACQUIRED 12,:000 kg. osx Ev I X1 Crew 1 a __ S t~ four 550 Vim. Gress. oad 6I ,oob kg. [A H Approved For Release 2006/08/08 : CIA-RDP82-00457R011800290001-3

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp82-00457r011800290001-3: PERFORMANCE STATISTICS AND OTHER CHARACTERISTICS OF SOVIET PLANES” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp82-00457r011800290001-3: PERFORMANCE STATISTICS AND OTHER CHARACTERISTICS OF SOVIET PLANES
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 1.91 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 7 times, the file-s went public at Sun Sep 08 2024.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp82-00457r011800290001-3: PERFORMANCE STATISTICS AND OTHER CHARACTERISTICS OF SOVIET PLANES at online marketplaces:


10CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp86m00886r002800150006-3: PERFORMANCE OF(SANITIZED)

By

Approved For Release 2008/08/20: CIA-RDP86M00886R002800150006-3 EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT ROUTING SLIP 3637 (\0-$n Approved For Release 2008/08/20: CIA-RDP86M00886R002800150006-3 F Approved For Release 2008/08/20: CIA-RDP86M00886R002800150006-3 EMORAN[k1M FOR: ER I Please send copies of attached (both incoming and outgoing) to DDO and D/Pers. Thanks. STAT FOP" Aft .A ILCF P FVUJS 5-7 Approved For Release 2008/08/20: CIA-RDP86M00886R002800150006-3 Approved For Release 2008/08/20: CIA-RDP86M00886R002800150006-3 one ueputy uircaor of t-enuai intewynce ER 84-2432/1 Ambassador Gordon R. Beyer, Chairman Department of International Studies The National War College Washington, D.C. 20319 Dear Ambassador Beyer: Thank you for the very thorough performance evaluation We are pleased that contribution to e program was as consistent as his performance has been for us over the years. We also appreciate the opportunity to participate at the War College. n c' a on STAT STAT STAT -III Approved For Release 2008/08/20: CIA-RDP86M00886R002800150006-3 Approved For Release 2008/08/20: CIA-RDP86M00886R002800150006-3 Iq Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied Approved For Release 2008/08/20: CIA-RDP86M00886R002800150006-3

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp86m00886r002800150006-3: PERFORMANCE OF(SANITIZED)” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp86m00886r002800150006-3: PERFORMANCE OF(SANITIZED)
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 1.09 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 2 times, the file-s went public at Sat Mar 08 2025.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp86m00886r002800150006-3: PERFORMANCE OF(SANITIZED) at online marketplaces:


11The Chromium Logo The Chromium Projects Home Chromium ChromiumOS Quick Links Report Bugs Discuss Other Sites Chromium Blog Google Chrome Extensions Except As Otherwise Noted, The Content Of This Page Is Licensed Under A Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, And Examples Are Licensed Under The BSD License. Privacy Edit This Page For Developers > How-Tos > Debugging Chromium On Windows First See Get The Code For Checkout And Build Instructions. Getting Started You Can Use Visual Studio's Built-in Debugger Or WinDBG To Debug Chromium. You Don't Need To Use The IDE To Build In Order To Use The Debugger: Autoninja Is Used To Build Chromium And Most Developers Invoke It From A Command Prompt, And Then Open The IDE For Debugging As Necessary. To Start Debugging An Already-built Executable With Visual Studio Just Launch Visual Studio (2019 Or Higher) And Select File-> Open-> Project/Solution (Ctrl+Shift+O) And Select The Executable Of Interest. This Will Create A Solution With That Executable As The 'project'. You Can Then Launch The Debugger With F5 Or F11 Or From The Debug Menu. If You Right-click On The Executable In Solution Explorer And Select Properties Then You Can Edit Things Such As The Executable Path, Command-line Arguments, And Working Directory. You Can Add Additional Executables To The Solution By Using File-> Add-> Existing Project And Selecting Another Already-built Executable. You Can Select Which One To Debug By Right-clicking On One Of Them In Solution Explorer And Selecting Set As Startup Project. When Your Solution File Is Customized To Your Taste You Can Save It To A Directory Such As Out\solutions. Saving It There Helps Ensure That Relative Paths To Source Files, Printed From Build Commands, Will Correctly Identify The Source Files. The Tools Menu Can Be Used To Add Commands To Do Things Like Invoke Autoninja To Build Chrome, Compile The Selected Source File, Or Other Things. Visual Studio 2017 Is Not Recommended For Debugging Of Chromium - Use A Newer Version For Best Performance And Stability. Symbol_level=2 Is The Default On Windows And Gives Full Debugging Information With Types, Locals, Globals, Function Names, And Source/line Information. Symbol_level=1 Creates Smaller PDBs With Just Function Names, And Source/line Information - Source-level Debugging Is Still Supported (new From June 2019), But Local Variables And Type Information Are Missing. Symbol_level=0 Gives Extremely Limited Debugging Abilities, Mostly Just Viewing Call Stacks When Chromium Crashes. Browsing Source Code If You Use A Solution File Generated By Gn (gn Gen --ide=vs) Then Intellisense May Help You Navigate The Code. If This Doesn't Work Or If You Use A Solution Created As Above Then You May Want To Install VsChromium To Help Navigate The Code, As Well As Using Https://source.chromium.org. Profiles It's A Good Idea To Use A Different Chrome Profile For Your Debugging. If You Are Debugging Google Chrome Branded Builds, Or Use A Chromium Build As Your Primary Browser, The Profiles Can Collide So You Can't Run Both At Once, And Your Stable Browser Might See Profile Versions From The Future (Google Chrome And Chromium Use Different Profile Directories By Default So Won't Collide). Use The Command-line Option: --user-data-dir=C:\tmp\my_debug_profile (replace The Path As Necessary) Using The IDE, Go To The Debugging Tab Of The Properties Of The Chrome Project, And Set The Command Arguments. Chrome Debug Log Enable Chrome Debug Logging To A File By Passing --enable-logging --v=1 Command-line Flags At Startup. Debug Builds Place The Chrome_debug.log File In The Out\Debug Directory. Release Builds Place The File In The Top Level Of The User Data Chromium App Directory, Which Is OS-version-dependent. For More Information, See Logging And User Data Directory Details. Symbol Server If You Are Debugging Official Google Chrome Release Builds, Use The Symbol Server: Https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com In Visual Studio, This Goes In Tools > Options Under Debugging > Symbols. You Should Set Up A Local Cache In A Empty Directory On Your Computer. In Windbg You Can Add This To Your Symbol Server Search Path With The Command Below, Where C:\symbols Is A Local Cache Directory: .sympath+ SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Alternately, You Can Set The _NT_SYMBOL_PATH Environment Variable To Include Both The Microsoft And Google Symbol Servers - VS, Windbg, And Other Tools Should Both Respect This Environment Variable: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Note That Symbol Servers Will Let The Debuggers Download Both The PE Files (DLLs And EXEs) And The PDB Files. Chrome Often Loads Third Party Libraries And Partial Symbols For Some Of These Are Also Public. For Example: AMD: Https://download.amd.com/dir/bin Nvidia: Https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/ Intel: Https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ For Example, For Completeness, The Following Symbol Server Environment Variable Will Resolve All Of The Above Sources - But This Is More Than Is Normally Needed: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://download.amd.com/dir/bin;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ Source Indexing You Should Set Up Source Indexing In Your Debugger (.srcfix In Windbg, Tools-> Options-> Debugging-> General-> Enable Source Server Support In Visual Studio) So That The Correct Source Files Will Automatically Be Downloaded Based On Information In The Downloaded Symbols. Additionally, You Must Have Python In Your Path In Order For The Command That Fetches Source Files To Succeed; Launching The Debugger From The Same Environment As Where You Build Chromium Is An Easy Way To Ensure It's Present. This Is Highly Recommended When Debugging Released Google Chrome Builds Or Looking At Crash Dumps. Having The Correct Version Of The Source Files Automatically Show Up Saves Significant Time So You Should Definitely Set This. Multi-process Issues Chromium Can Be Challenging To Debug Because Of Its Multi-process Architecture. When You Select Run In The Debugger, Only The Main Browser Process Will Be Debugged. The Code That Actually Renders Web Pages (the Renderer) And The Plugins Will Be In Separate Processes That's Not (yet!) Being Debugged. The ProcessExplorer Tool Has A Process Tree View Where You Can See How These Processes Are Related. You Can Also Get The Process IDs Associated With Each Tab From The Chrome Task Manager (right-click On An Empty Area Of The Window Title Bar To Open). Automatically Attach To Child Processes There Are Two Visual Studio Extensions That Enable The Debugger To Automatically Attach To All Chrome Processes, So You Can Debug All Of Chrome At Once. Microsoft's Child Process Debugging Power Tool Is A Standalone Extension For This, And VsChromium Is Another Option That Bundles Many Other Additional Features. In Addition To Installing One Of These Extensions, You Must Run Visual Studio As Administrator, Or It Will Silently Fail To Attach To Some Of Chrome's Child Processes. Single-process Mode One Way To Debug Issues Is To Run Chromium In Single-process Mode. This Will Allow You To See The Entire State Of The Program Without Extra Work (although It Will Still Have Many Threads). To Use Single-process Mode, Add The Command-line Flag --single-process This Approach Isn't Perfect Because Some Problems Won't Manifest Themselves In This Mode And Some Features Don't Work And Worker Threads Are Still Spawned Into New Processes. Manually Attaching To A Child Process You Can Attach To The Running Child Processes With The Debugger. Select Tools > Attach To Process And Click The Chrome.exe Process You Want To Attach To. Before Attaching, Make Sure You Have Selected Only Native Code When Attaching To The Process This Is Done By Clicking Select... In The Attach To Process Window And Only Checking Native. If You Forget This, It May Attempt To Attach In "WebKit" Mode To Debug JavaScript, And You'll Get An Error Message "An Operation Is Not Legal In The Current State." You Can Now Debug The Two Processes As If They Were One. When You Are Debugging Multiple Processes, Open The Debug > Windows > Processes Window To Switch Between Them. Sometimes You Are Debugging Something That Only Happens On Startup, And Want To See The Child Process As Soon As It Starts. Use: --renderer-startup-dialog --no-sandbox You Have To Disable The Sandbox Or The Dialog Box Will Be Prohibited From Showing. When The Dialog Appears, Visit Tools > Attach To Process And Attach To The Process Showing The Renderer Startup Dialog. Now You're Debugging In The Renderer And Can Continue Execution By Pressing OK In The Dialog. Startup Dialogs Also Exist For Other Child Process Types: --gpu-startup-dialog, --ppapi-startup-dialog, --utility-startup-dialog, --plugin-startup-dialog (for NPAPI). For Utilities, You Can Add A Service Type --utility-startup-dialog=data_decoder.mojom.DataDecoderService. You Can Also Try The Vs-chromium Plug-in To Attach To The Right Processes. Semi-automatically Attaching The Debugger To Child Processes The Following Flags Cause Child Processes To Wait For 60 Seconds In A Busy Loop For A Debugger To Attach To The Process. Once Either Condition Is True, It Continues On; No Exception Is Thrown. --wait-for-debugger-children[=filter] The Filter, If Provided, Will Fire Only If It Matches The --type Parameter To The Process. Values Include Renderer, Plugin (for NPAPI), Ppapi, Gpu-process, And Utility. When Using This Option, It May Be Helpful To Limit The Number Of Renderer Processes Spawned, Using: --renderer-process-limit=1 Image File Execution Options Using Image File Execution Options (IFEO) Will Not Work Because CreateProcess() Returns The Handle To The Debugger Process Instead Of The Intended Child Process. There Are Also Issues With The Sandbox. Time Travel Debugging You Can Do Time Travel Debugging Using WinDbg Preview (must Be Installed From The Microsoft Store). This Lets You Execute A Program Forward And Backwards. After Capturing A Trace, You Can Set Breakpoints And Step Through Code As Normal, But Also Provides 'backwards' Commands (g-, T-, P-) So That You Can Go Back And Forth Through The Execution. It Is Especially Useful To Set Data Breakpoints (ba Command) And Reverse Continuing, So You Can See When A Certain Variable Was Last Changed To Its Current Value. Chromium Specifics: The Type Of Injection The Time Travel Tracer Needs To Perform Is Incompatible With The Chromium Sandbox. In Order To Record A Trace, You'll Need To Run With --no-sandbox. Chromium Cannot Run Elevated With Administrator Privileges, So The "Launch Executable (advance)" Option Won't Work, You'll Need To Attach After The Process Has Already Launched Via The Checkbox In The Bottom Right. If You Need To Record Startup-like Things, You'll Have To Use --{browser,gpu,renderer,utility}-startup-dialog, Then Attach (and Hope The Relevant Code Hasn't Executed Before That Point). JsDbg -- Data Structure Visualization You Can Install JsDbg As A Plugin For WinDbg Or Visual Studio. It Interactively Lets You Look At Data Structures (such As The DOM Tree, Accessibility Tree, Layout Object Tree, And Others) In A Web Browser As You Debug. See The JsDbg Site For Some Screen Shots And Usage Examples. This Also Works When Examining Memory Dumps (though Not Minidumps), And Also Works Together With Time Travel Debugging. Visual Studio Hints Debug Visualizers Chrome's Custom Debug Visualizers Should Be Added To The Pdb Files And Automatically Picked Up By Visual Studio. The Definitions Are In //tools/win/DebugVisualizers If You Need To Modify Them (the BUILD.gn File There Has Additional Instructions). Don't Step Into Trivial Functions The Debugger Can Be Configured To Automatically Not Step Into Functions Based On Regular Expression. Edit Default.natstepfilter In The Following Directory: For Visual Studio 2015: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers (for All Users) Or %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2015\Visualizers (for The Current User Only) For Visual Studio 2017 Pro: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Professional\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers (for All Users) Or %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2017\Visualizers (for The Current User Only) Add Regular Expressions Of Functions To Not Step Into. Remember To Regex-escape And XML-escape Them, E.g. < For < And \. For A Literal Dot. Example: Operator New NoStepInto Operator Delete NoStepInto Std::.* NoStepInto WTF::.*Ptr ::.* NoStepInto This File Is Read At Start Of A Debugging Session (F5), So You Don't Need To Restart Visual Studio After Changing It. More Info: Microsoft Email Thread V8 And Chromium V8 Supports Many Command-line Flags That Are Useful For Debugging. V8 Command-line Flags Can Be Set Via The Chromium Command-line Flag --js-flags; For Instance: Chrome.exe --js-flags="--trace_exception --heap_stats" Note That Some V8 Command-line Flags Exist Only In The Debug Build Of V8. For A List Of All V8 Flags Try: Chrome.exe --js-flags="--help" Graphics Debugging GPU Acceleration Of Rendering Can Be More Easily Debugged With Tools. See: Graphics Debugging In Visual Studio 2013 Graphical Debugging With NVIDIA NSight Debugging On Another Machine Sometimes It's Useful To Debug Installation And Execution On A Machine Other Than Your Primary Build Box. To Run The Installer On Said Other Machine, First Build The Mini_installer Target On Your Main Build Machine (e.g., Autoninja -C Out\Debug Mini_installer). Next, On The Debug Machine: Make The Build Machine's Build Volume Available On The Debug Machine Either By Mounting It Locally (e.g., Z:\) Or By Crafting A UNC Path To It (e.g., \\builder\src) Open Up A Command Prompt And Change To A Local Disk Run Src\tools\win\copy-installer.bat In The Remote Checkout By Way Of The Mount (e.g., Z:\PATHTOCHECKOUT\src\...) Or UNC Path (e.g., \\builder\src\...). This Will Copy The Installer, DLLs, And PDBs Into Your Debug Machine's C:\out Or C:\build (depending On If You're Rocking The Component=shared_library Build Or Not) Run C:\out\Debug\mini_installer.exe With The Flags Of Your Choice To Install Chrome. This Can Take Some Time, Especially On A Slow Machine. Watch The Task Manager And Wait Until Mini_installer.exe Exits Before Trying To Launch Chrome (by Way Of The Shortcut(s) Created By The Installer) For Extra Pleasure, Add C:\out\Debug To Your _NT_SYMBOL_PATH Environment Variable Consider Reading The Documentation At The Top Of Copy-installer.bat To See How You Can Run It. It Tries To Be Smart And Copy The Right Things, But You May Need To Be Explicit (e.g., "copy-installer.bat Out Debug"). It Is Safe To Re-run The Script To Copy Only Modified Files (after A Rebuild, For Example). You Can Also Use The Zip Action Of The Isolate Scripts (tools\mb\mb.py) To Package All The Files For A Target Into A Single Zip File, For Example: Python Tools\mb\mb.py Zip Out/Release Base_unittests Base_unittests.zip Finding All Memory Allocations It Is Possible To Use Heap Snapshots To Get Call Stacks On All Outstanding Allocations That Use The OS Heap. This Works Particularly Well If Heap Snapshots Are Started As Soon As The Chrome Browser Process Is Created, But Before It Starts Running. Details Can Be Found In This Batch File. However, With PartitionAlloc Everywhere Most Chromium Allocations No Longer Use The Windows Heap So This Will Only Find A Subset Of Allocations, Mostly From OS DLLs. Find Memory Leaks Note: As With Heap Snapshots The Utility Of UMDH Is Greatly Reduced Now Because PartitionAlloc Everywhere Has Mostly Replaced The Windows Heap. The Windows Heap Manager Has A Really Useful Debug Flag, Where It Can Be Asked To Capture And Store A Stack Trace With Every Allocation. The Tool To Scrape These Stack Traces Out Of Processes Is UMDH, Which Comes With WinDbg. UMDH Is Great. It Will Capture A Snapshot Of The Heap State As Many Times As You Like, And It'll Do It Fairly Quickly. You Then Run It Again Against Either A Single Snapshot, Or A Pair Of Snapshots, At Which Time It'll Symbolize The Stack Traces And Aggregate Usage Up To Unique Stack Traces. Turning On The User Stack Trace Database For Chrome.exe With Gflags.exe Makes It Run Unbearably Slowly; However, Turning On The User Stack Trace Database On For The Browser Alone Is Just Fine. While It's Possible To Turn On The User Stack Database With The "!gflag" Debugging Extension, It's Too Late To Do This By The Time The Initial Debugger Breakpoint Hits. The Only Reasonable Way To Do This Is To Launch GFlags.exe, Enable The User Stack Trace Database (per Image Below), Launch Chrome Under The Debugger. Set A Breakpont When Chrome.dll Loads With "sxe Ld Chrome.dll". Step Up, To Allow Chrome.dll To Initialize. Disable The Stack Trace Database In GFlags.exe. Continue Chrome, Optionally Detaching The Debugger. Image GFlags.exe Settings For User Mode Stack Trace Database. If You Then Ever Suffer A Browser Memory Leak, You Can Snarf A Dump Of The Process With Umdh -p: > Chrome-browser-leak-umdh-dump.txt Which Can Then Typically Be "trivially" Analyzed To Find The Culprit. Miscellaneous Note That By Default Application Verifier Only Works With Non-official Builds Of Chromium. To Use Application Verifier On Official Builds You Need To Add --disable-features=RendererCodeIntegrity To Avoid Sandbox Crashes In Renderer Processes. See Crbug.com/1004989 For Details. See Also This Page. Application Verifier Is A Free Tool From Microsoft (available As Part Of The Windows SDK) That Can Be Used To Flush Out Programming Errors. Starting With M68 Application Verifier Can Be Enabled For Chrome.exe Without Needing To Disable The Sandbox. After Adding Chrome.exe To The List Of Applications To Be Stressed You Need To Expand The List Of Basics Checks And Disable The Leak Checks. You May Also Need To Disable Handles And Locks Checks Depending On Your Graphics Driver And Specific Chrome Version, But The Eventual Goal Is To Have Chrome Run With Handles And Locks Checks Enabled. When Bugs Are Found Chrome Will Trigger A Breakpoint So Running All Chrome Processes Under A Debugger Is Recommended. Chrome Will Run Much More Slowly Because Application Verifier Puts Every Heap Allocation On A Separate Page. Note That With PartitionAlloc Everywhere Most Chromium Allocations Don't Actually Go Through The Windows Heap And Are Therefore Unaffected By Application Verifier. You Can Check The Undocumented 'Cuzz' Checkbox In Application Verifier To Get The Windows Thread Scheduler To Add Some Extra Randomness In Order To Help Expose Race Conditions In Your Code. To Put A Breakpoint On CreateFile(), Add This Break Point: {,,kernel32.dll}_CreateFileW@28 {,,kernel32.dll} Specifies The DLL (context Operator). _ Prefix Means Extern "C". @28 Postfix Means _stdcall With The Stack Pop At The End Of The Function. I.e. The Number Of Arguments In BYTES. You Can Use DebugView From SysInternals Or Sawbuck To View LOG() Messages That Normally Go To Stderr On POSIX.

The Chromium Projects Home Chromium ChromiumOS Quick links Report bugs Discuss Other sites Chromium Blog Google Chrome Extensions Except as otherwise  noted , the content of this page is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 license , and examples are licensed under the  BSD License . Privacy Edit this page For Developers  &gt;  How-Tos  &gt; Debugging Chromium on Windows First see  get the code  for checkout and build instructions. Getting started You can use Visual Studio's built-in debugger or  WinDBG  to debug Chromium. You don't need to use the IDE to build in order to use the debugger: autoninja is used to build Chromium and most developers invoke it from a command prompt, and then open the IDE for debugging as necessary. To start debugging an already-built executable with Visual Studio just launch Visual Studio (2019 or higher) and select File-&gt; Open-&gt; Project/Solution (Ctrl+Shift+O) and select the executable of interest. This will create a solution with that executable as the 'project'. You can then launch the debugger with F5 or F11 or from the Debug menu. If you right-click on the executable in Solution Explorer and select properties then you can edit things such as the executable path, command-line arguments, and working directory. You can add additional executables to the solution by using File-&gt; Add-&gt; Existing Project and selecting another already-built executable. You can select which one to debug by right-clicking on one of them in Solution Explorer and selecting Set as Startup Project. When your solution file is customized to your taste you can save it to a directory such as out\solutions. Saving it there helps ensure that relative paths to source files, printed from build commands, will correctly identify the source files. The Tools menu can be used to add commands to do things like invoke autoninja to build Chrome, compile the selected source file, or other things. Visual Studio 2017 is not recommended for debugging of Chromium - use a newer version for best performance and stability. symbol_level=2  is the default on Windows and gives full debugging information with types, locals, globals, function names, and source/line information.  symbol_level=1  creates smaller PDBs with just function names, and source/line information - source-level debugging is still supported (new from June 2019), but local variables and type information are missing.  symbol_level=0  gives extremely limited debugging abilities, mostly just viewing call stacks when Chromium crashes. Browsing source code If you use a solution file generated by gn ( gn gen --ide=vs ) then Intellisense may help you navigate the code. If this doesn't work or if you use a solution created as above then you may want to install  VsChromium  to help navigate the code, as well as using  https://source.chromium.org . Profiles It's a good idea to use a different Chrome profile for your debugging. If you are debugging Google Chrome branded builds, or use a Chromium build as your primary browser, the profiles can collide so you can't run both at once, and your stable browser might see profile versions from the future (Google Chrome and Chromium use different profile directories by default so won't collide). Use the command-line option: --user-data-dir =C:\tmp\my_debug_profile (replace the path as necessary) Using the IDE, go to the  Debugging  tab of the properties of the chrome project, and set the  Command Arguments. Chrome debug log Enable Chrome debug logging to a file by passing  --enable-logging --v=1  command-line flags at startup. Debug builds place the  chrome_debug.log  file in the  out\Debug  directory. Release builds place the file in the top level of the user data Chromium app directory, which is OS-version-dependent. For more information, see  logging  and  user data directory  details. Symbol server If you are debugging official Google Chrome release builds, use the symbol server: https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com In Visual Studio, this goes in  Tools &gt; Options  under  Debugging &gt; Symbols . You should set up a local cache in a empty directory on your computer. In windbg you can add this to your symbol server search path with the command below, where C:\symbols is a local cache directory: .sympath+ SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Alternately, You can set the _NT_SYMBOL_PATH environment variable to include both the Microsoft and Google symbol servers - VS, windbg, and other tools should both respect this environment variable: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH =SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols ;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Note that symbol servers will let the debuggers download both the PE files (DLLs and EXEs) and the PDB files. Chrome often loads third party libraries and partial symbols for some of these are also public. For example: AMD : https://download.amd.com/dir/bin Nvidia : https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/ Intel : https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ For example, for completeness, the following symbol server environment variable will resolve all of the above sources - but this is more than is normally needed: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://download.amd.com/dir/bin;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ Source indexing You should set up source indexing in your debugger ( .srcfix  in windbg, Tools-&gt; Options-&gt; Debugging-&gt; General-&gt;  Enable source server support  in Visual Studio) so that the correct source files will automatically be downloaded based on information in the downloaded symbols. Additionally, you must have  python  in your  path  in order for the  command that fetches source files  to succeed; launching the debugger from the same environment as where you build Chromium is an easy way to ensure it's present. This is highly recommended when debugging released Google Chrome builds or looking at crash dumps. Having the correct version of the source files automatically show up saves significant time so you should definitely set this. Multi-process issues Chromium can be challenging to debug because of its  multi-process architecture . When you select  Run  in the debugger, only the main browser process will be debugged. The code that actually renders web pages (the Renderer) and the plugins will be in separate processes that's not (yet!) being debugged. The  ProcessExplorer  tool has a process tree view where you can see how these processes are related. You can also get the process IDs associated with each tab from the Chrome Task Manager (right-click on an empty area of the window title bar to open). Automatically attach to child processes There are two Visual Studio extensions that enable the debugger to automatically attach to all Chrome processes, so you can debug all of Chrome at once. Microsoft's  Child Process Debugging Power Tool  is a standalone extension for this, and  VsChromium  is another option that bundles many other additional features. In addition to installing one of these extensions, you  must  run Visual Studio as Administrator, or it will silently fail to attach to some of Chrome's child processes. Single-process mode One way to debug issues is to run Chromium in single-process mode. This will allow you to see the entire state of the program without extra work (although it will still have many threads). To use single-process mode, add the command-line flag --single-process This approach isn't perfect because some problems won't manifest themselves in this mode and some features don't work and worker threads are still spawned into new processes. Manually attaching to a child process You can attach to the running child processes with the debugger. Select  Tools &gt; Attach to Process  and click the  chrome.exe  process you want to attach to. Before attaching, make sure you have selected only Native code when attaching to the process This is done by clicking Select... in the Attach to Process window and only checking Native. If you forget this, it may attempt to attach in "WebKit" mode to debug JavaScript, and you'll get an error message "An operation is not legal in the current state." You can now debug the two processes as if they were one. When you are debugging multiple processes, open the  Debug &gt; Windows &gt; Processes  window to switch between them. Sometimes you are debugging something that only happens on startup, and want to see the child process as soon as it starts. Use: --renderer-startup-dialog --no-sandbox You have to disable the sandbox or the dialog box will be prohibited from showing. When the dialog appears, visit Tools &gt; Attach to Process and attach to the process showing the Renderer startup dialog. Now you're debugging in the renderer and can continue execution by pressing OK in the dialog. Startup dialogs also exist for other child process types:  --gpu-startup-dialog ,  --ppapi-startup-dialog ,  --utility-startup-dialog ,  --plugin-startup-dialog  (for NPAPI). For utilities, you can add a service type  --utility-startup-dialog=data_decoder.mojom.DataDecoderService . You can also try  the vs-chromium plug-in  to attach to the right processes. Semi-automatically attaching the debugger to child processes The following flags cause child processes to wait for 60 seconds in a busy loop for a debugger to attach to the process. Once either condition is true, it continues on; no exception is thrown. --wait-for-debugger-children [=filter] The filter, if provided, will fire only if it matches the  --type  parameter to the process. Values include  renderer ,  plugin  (for NPAPI),  ppapi ,  gpu-process , and  utility . When using this option, it may be helpful to limit the number of renderer processes spawned, using: --renderer-process-limit = 1 Image File Execution Options Using Image File Execution Options (IFEO) will not work because CreateProcess() returns the handle to the debugger process instead of the intended child process. There are also issues with the sandbox. Time travel debugging You can do  time travel debugging using WinDbg Preview  (must be installed from the Microsoft Store). This lets you execute a program forward and backwards. After capturing a trace, you can set breakpoints and step through code as normal, but also provides 'backwards' commands (g-, t-, p-) so that you can go back and forth through the execution. It is especially useful to set data breakpoints ( ba command ) and reverse continuing, so you can see when a certain variable was last changed to its current value. Chromium specifics: The type of injection the time travel tracer needs to perform is incompatible with the Chromium sandbox. In order to record a trace, you'll need to run with  --no-sandbox . Chromium cannot run elevated with Administrator privileges, so the "Launch executable (advance)" option won't work, you'll need to attach after the process has already launched via the checkbox in the bottom right. If you need to record startup-like things, you'll have to use --{browser,gpu,renderer,utility}-startup-dialog, then attach (and hope the relevant code hasn't executed before that point). JsDbg -- data structure visualization You can install  JsDbg as a plugin for WinDbg or Visual Studio . It interactively lets you look at data structures (such as the DOM tree, Accessibility tree, layout object tree, and others) in a web browser as you debug. See the  JsDbg site  for some screen shots and usage examples. This also works when examining memory dumps (though not minidumps), and also works together with time travel debugging. Visual Studio hints Debug visualizers Chrome's custom debug visualizers should be added to the pdb files and automatically picked up by Visual Studio. The definitions are in  //tools/win/DebugVisualizers  if you need to modify them (the BUILD.gn file there has additional instructions). Don't step into trivial functions The debugger can be configured to automatically not step into functions based on regular expression. Edit  default.natstepfilter  in the following directory: For Visual Studio 2015:  C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers  (for all users) or  %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2015\Visualizers  (for the current user only) For Visual Studio 2017 Pro:  C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Professional\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers  (for all users) or  %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2017\Visualizers  (for the current user only) Add regular expressions of functions to not step into. Remember to regex-escape  and  XML-escape them, e.g. &lt; for &lt; and \. for a literal dot. Example: &lt; Function &gt; &lt; Name &gt; operator new &lt;/ Name &gt; &lt; Action &gt; NoStepInto &lt;/ Action &gt; &lt;/ Function &gt; &lt; Function &gt; &lt; Name &gt; operator delete &lt;/ Name &gt; &lt; Action &gt; NoStepInto &lt;/ Action &gt; &lt;/ Function &gt; &lt;!-- Skip everything in std --&gt; &lt; Function &gt; &lt; Name &gt; std::.* &lt;/ Name &gt; &lt; Action &gt; NoStepInto &lt;/ Action &gt; &lt;/ Function &gt; &lt;!-- all methods on WebKit OwnPtr and variants, ... WTF::*Ptr&lt;*&gt;::* --&gt; &lt; Function &gt; &lt; Name &gt; WTF::.*Ptr&lt;.*&gt;::.* &lt;/ Name &gt; &lt; Action &gt; NoStepInto &lt;/ Action &gt; &lt;/ Function &gt; This file is read at start of a debugging session (F5), so you don't need to restart Visual Studio after changing it. More info:  Microsoft email thread V8 and Chromium V8 supports many command-line flags that are useful for debugging. V8 command-line flags can be set via the Chromium command-line flag --js-flags; for instance: chrome.exe --js-flags= "--trace_exception --heap_stats" Note that some V8 command-line flags exist only in the debug build of V8. For a list of all V8 flags try: chrome.exe --js-flags= "--help" Graphics debugging GPU Acceleration of rendering can be more easily debugged with tools. See: Graphics Debugging in Visual Studio 2013 Graphical debugging with NVIDIA NSight Debugging on another machine Sometimes it's useful to debug installation and execution on a machine other than your primary build box. To run the installer on said other machine, first build the mini_installer target on your main build machine (e.g., autoninja -C out\Debug mini_installer). Next, on the debug machine: Make the build machine's build volume available on the debug machine either by mounting it locally (e.g., Z:\) or by crafting a UNC path to it (e.g., \\builder\src) Open up a command prompt and change to a local disk Run src\tools\win\ copy-installer.bat  in the remote checkout by way of the mount (e.g., Z:\PATHTOCHECKOUT\src\...) or UNC path (e.g., \\builder\src\...). This will copy the installer, DLLs, and PDBs into your debug machine's C:\out or C:\build (depending on if you're rocking the component=shared_library build or not) Run  C:\out\Debug\mini_installer.exe  with the flags of your choice to install Chrome. This can take some time, especially on a slow machine. Watch the Task Manager and wait until mini_installer.exe exits before trying to launch Chrome (by way of the shortcut(s) created by the installer) For extra pleasure, add C:\out\Debug to your _NT_SYMBOL_PATH environment variable Consider reading the documentation at the top of copy-installer.bat to see how you can run it. It tries to be smart and copy the right things, but you may need to be explicit (e.g., "copy-installer.bat out Debug"). It is safe to re-run the script to copy only modified files (after a rebuild, for example). You can also use the zip action of the isolate scripts (tools\mb\mb.py) to package all the files for a target into a single zip file, for example: python tools\mb\mb.py zip out/Release base_unittests base_unittests. zip Finding all memory allocations It is possible to use Heap Snapshots to get call stacks on all outstanding allocations that use the OS heap. This works particularly well if heap snapshots are started as soon as the Chrome browser process is created, but before it starts running. Details can be found in  this batch file . However, with  PartitionAlloc Everywhere  most Chromium allocations no longer use the Windows heap so this will only find a subset of allocations, mostly from OS DLLs. Find memory leaks Note: as with Heap Snapshots the utility of UMDH is greatly reduced now because PartitionAlloc Everywhere has mostly replaced the Windows heap. The Windows heap manager has a really useful debug flag, where it can be asked to capture and store a stack trace with every allocation. The tool to scrape these stack traces out of processes is UMDH, which comes with  WinDbg . UMDH is great. It will capture a snapshot of the heap state as many times as you like, and it'll do it fairly quickly. You then run it again against either a single snapshot, or a pair of snapshots, at which time it'll symbolize the stack traces and aggregate usage up to unique stack traces. Turning on the user stack trace database for chrome.exe with gflags.exe makes it run unbearably slowly; however, turning on the user stack trace database on for the browser alone is just fine. While it's possible to turn on the user stack database with the "!gflag" debugging extension, it's too late to do this by the time the initial debugger breakpoint hits. The only reasonable way to do this is to Launch GFlags.exe, Enable the user stack trace database (per image below), Launch Chrome under the debugger. Set a breakpont when chrome.dll loads with "sxe ld chrome.dll". Step up, to allow Chrome.dll to initialize. Disable the stack trace database in GFlags.exe. Continue chrome, optionally detaching the debugger. GFlags.exe settings for user mode stack trace database. If you then ever suffer a browser memory leak, you can snarf a dump of the process with umdh - p :&lt;my browser pid&gt; &gt; chrome-browser-leak-umdh-dump.txt which can then typically be "trivially" analyzed to find the culprit. Miscellaneous Note that by default Application Verifier only works with non-official builds of Chromium. To use Application Verifier on official builds you need to add --disable-features=RendererCodeIntegrity to avoid sandbox crashes in renderer processes. See  crbug.com/1004989  for details. See also  this page . Application Verifier  is a free tool from Microsoft (available as part of the Windows SDK) that can be used to flush out programming errors. Starting with M68 Application Verifier can be enabled for chrome.exe without needing to disable the sandbox. After adding chrome.exe to the list of applications to be stressed you need to expand the list of Basics checks and disable the  Leak  checks. You may also need to disable  Handles  and  Locks  checks depending on your graphics driver and specific Chrome version, but the eventual goal is to have Chrome run with  Handles  and  Locks  checks enabled. When bugs are found Chrome will trigger a breakpoint so running all Chrome processes under a debugger is recommended. Chrome will run much more slowly because Application Verifier puts every heap allocation on a separate page. Note that with PartitionAlloc Everywhere most Chromium allocations don't actually go through the Windows heap and are therefore unaffected by Application Verifier. You can check the undocumented 'Cuzz' checkbox in Application Verifier to get the Windows thread scheduler to add some extra randomness in order to help expose race conditions in your code. To put a breakpoint on CreateFile(), add this break point: {,,kernel32.dll}_CreateFileW@28 {,,kernel32.dll} specifies the DLL (context operator). _ prefix means extern "C". @28 postfix means _stdcall with the stack pop at the end of the function. i.e. the number of arguments in BYTES. You can use  DebugView  from SysInternals or  sawbuck  to view LOG() messages that normally go to stderr on POSIX.

“The Chromium Logo The Chromium Projects Home Chromium ChromiumOS Quick Links Report Bugs Discuss Other Sites Chromium Blog Google Chrome Extensions Except As Otherwise Noted, The Content Of This Page Is Licensed Under A Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, And Examples Are Licensed Under The BSD License. Privacy Edit This Page For Developers > How-Tos > Debugging Chromium On Windows First See Get The Code For Checkout And Build Instructions. Getting Started You Can Use Visual Studio's Built-in Debugger Or WinDBG To Debug Chromium. You Don't Need To Use The IDE To Build In Order To Use The Debugger: Autoninja Is Used To Build Chromium And Most Developers Invoke It From A Command Prompt, And Then Open The IDE For Debugging As Necessary. To Start Debugging An Already-built Executable With Visual Studio Just Launch Visual Studio (2019 Or Higher) And Select File-> Open-> Project/Solution (Ctrl+Shift+O) And Select The Executable Of Interest. This Will Create A Solution With That Executable As The 'project'. You Can Then Launch The Debugger With F5 Or F11 Or From The Debug Menu. If You Right-click On The Executable In Solution Explorer And Select Properties Then You Can Edit Things Such As The Executable Path, Command-line Arguments, And Working Directory. You Can Add Additional Executables To The Solution By Using File-> Add-> Existing Project And Selecting Another Already-built Executable. You Can Select Which One To Debug By Right-clicking On One Of Them In Solution Explorer And Selecting Set As Startup Project. When Your Solution File Is Customized To Your Taste You Can Save It To A Directory Such As Out\solutions. Saving It There Helps Ensure That Relative Paths To Source Files, Printed From Build Commands, Will Correctly Identify The Source Files. The Tools Menu Can Be Used To Add Commands To Do Things Like Invoke Autoninja To Build Chrome, Compile The Selected Source File, Or Other Things. Visual Studio 2017 Is Not Recommended For Debugging Of Chromium - Use A Newer Version For Best Performance And Stability. Symbol_level=2 Is The Default On Windows And Gives Full Debugging Information With Types, Locals, Globals, Function Names, And Source/line Information. Symbol_level=1 Creates Smaller PDBs With Just Function Names, And Source/line Information - Source-level Debugging Is Still Supported (new From June 2019), But Local Variables And Type Information Are Missing. Symbol_level=0 Gives Extremely Limited Debugging Abilities, Mostly Just Viewing Call Stacks When Chromium Crashes. Browsing Source Code If You Use A Solution File Generated By Gn (gn Gen --ide=vs) Then Intellisense May Help You Navigate The Code. If This Doesn't Work Or If You Use A Solution Created As Above Then You May Want To Install VsChromium To Help Navigate The Code, As Well As Using Https://source.chromium.org. Profiles It's A Good Idea To Use A Different Chrome Profile For Your Debugging. If You Are Debugging Google Chrome Branded Builds, Or Use A Chromium Build As Your Primary Browser, The Profiles Can Collide So You Can't Run Both At Once, And Your Stable Browser Might See Profile Versions From The Future (Google Chrome And Chromium Use Different Profile Directories By Default So Won't Collide). Use The Command-line Option: --user-data-dir=C:\tmp\my_debug_profile (replace The Path As Necessary) Using The IDE, Go To The Debugging Tab Of The Properties Of The Chrome Project, And Set The Command Arguments. Chrome Debug Log Enable Chrome Debug Logging To A File By Passing --enable-logging --v=1 Command-line Flags At Startup. Debug Builds Place The Chrome_debug.log File In The Out\Debug Directory. Release Builds Place The File In The Top Level Of The User Data Chromium App Directory, Which Is OS-version-dependent. For More Information, See Logging And User Data Directory Details. Symbol Server If You Are Debugging Official Google Chrome Release Builds, Use The Symbol Server: Https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com In Visual Studio, This Goes In Tools > Options Under Debugging > Symbols. You Should Set Up A Local Cache In A Empty Directory On Your Computer. In Windbg You Can Add This To Your Symbol Server Search Path With The Command Below, Where C:\symbols Is A Local Cache Directory: .sympath+ SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Alternately, You Can Set The _NT_SYMBOL_PATH Environment Variable To Include Both The Microsoft And Google Symbol Servers - VS, Windbg, And Other Tools Should Both Respect This Environment Variable: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Note That Symbol Servers Will Let The Debuggers Download Both The PE Files (DLLs And EXEs) And The PDB Files. Chrome Often Loads Third Party Libraries And Partial Symbols For Some Of These Are Also Public. For Example: AMD: Https://download.amd.com/dir/bin Nvidia: Https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/ Intel: Https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ For Example, For Completeness, The Following Symbol Server Environment Variable Will Resolve All Of The Above Sources - But This Is More Than Is Normally Needed: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://download.amd.com/dir/bin;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ Source Indexing You Should Set Up Source Indexing In Your Debugger (.srcfix In Windbg, Tools-> Options-> Debugging-> General-> Enable Source Server Support In Visual Studio) So That The Correct Source Files Will Automatically Be Downloaded Based On Information In The Downloaded Symbols. Additionally, You Must Have Python In Your Path In Order For The Command That Fetches Source Files To Succeed; Launching The Debugger From The Same Environment As Where You Build Chromium Is An Easy Way To Ensure It's Present. This Is Highly Recommended When Debugging Released Google Chrome Builds Or Looking At Crash Dumps. Having The Correct Version Of The Source Files Automatically Show Up Saves Significant Time So You Should Definitely Set This. Multi-process Issues Chromium Can Be Challenging To Debug Because Of Its Multi-process Architecture. When You Select Run In The Debugger, Only The Main Browser Process Will Be Debugged. The Code That Actually Renders Web Pages (the Renderer) And The Plugins Will Be In Separate Processes That's Not (yet!) Being Debugged. The ProcessExplorer Tool Has A Process Tree View Where You Can See How These Processes Are Related. You Can Also Get The Process IDs Associated With Each Tab From The Chrome Task Manager (right-click On An Empty Area Of The Window Title Bar To Open). Automatically Attach To Child Processes There Are Two Visual Studio Extensions That Enable The Debugger To Automatically Attach To All Chrome Processes, So You Can Debug All Of Chrome At Once. Microsoft's Child Process Debugging Power Tool Is A Standalone Extension For This, And VsChromium Is Another Option That Bundles Many Other Additional Features. In Addition To Installing One Of These Extensions, You Must Run Visual Studio As Administrator, Or It Will Silently Fail To Attach To Some Of Chrome's Child Processes. Single-process Mode One Way To Debug Issues Is To Run Chromium In Single-process Mode. This Will Allow You To See The Entire State Of The Program Without Extra Work (although It Will Still Have Many Threads). To Use Single-process Mode, Add The Command-line Flag --single-process This Approach Isn't Perfect Because Some Problems Won't Manifest Themselves In This Mode And Some Features Don't Work And Worker Threads Are Still Spawned Into New Processes. Manually Attaching To A Child Process You Can Attach To The Running Child Processes With The Debugger. Select Tools > Attach To Process And Click The Chrome.exe Process You Want To Attach To. Before Attaching, Make Sure You Have Selected Only Native Code When Attaching To The Process This Is Done By Clicking Select... In The Attach To Process Window And Only Checking Native. If You Forget This, It May Attempt To Attach In "WebKit" Mode To Debug JavaScript, And You'll Get An Error Message "An Operation Is Not Legal In The Current State." You Can Now Debug The Two Processes As If They Were One. When You Are Debugging Multiple Processes, Open The Debug > Windows > Processes Window To Switch Between Them. Sometimes You Are Debugging Something That Only Happens On Startup, And Want To See The Child Process As Soon As It Starts. Use: --renderer-startup-dialog --no-sandbox You Have To Disable The Sandbox Or The Dialog Box Will Be Prohibited From Showing. When The Dialog Appears, Visit Tools > Attach To Process And Attach To The Process Showing The Renderer Startup Dialog. Now You're Debugging In The Renderer And Can Continue Execution By Pressing OK In The Dialog. Startup Dialogs Also Exist For Other Child Process Types: --gpu-startup-dialog, --ppapi-startup-dialog, --utility-startup-dialog, --plugin-startup-dialog (for NPAPI). For Utilities, You Can Add A Service Type --utility-startup-dialog=data_decoder.mojom.DataDecoderService. You Can Also Try The Vs-chromium Plug-in To Attach To The Right Processes. Semi-automatically Attaching The Debugger To Child Processes The Following Flags Cause Child Processes To Wait For 60 Seconds In A Busy Loop For A Debugger To Attach To The Process. Once Either Condition Is True, It Continues On; No Exception Is Thrown. --wait-for-debugger-children[=filter] The Filter, If Provided, Will Fire Only If It Matches The --type Parameter To The Process. Values Include Renderer, Plugin (for NPAPI), Ppapi, Gpu-process, And Utility. When Using This Option, It May Be Helpful To Limit The Number Of Renderer Processes Spawned, Using: --renderer-process-limit=1 Image File Execution Options Using Image File Execution Options (IFEO) Will Not Work Because CreateProcess() Returns The Handle To The Debugger Process Instead Of The Intended Child Process. There Are Also Issues With The Sandbox. Time Travel Debugging You Can Do Time Travel Debugging Using WinDbg Preview (must Be Installed From The Microsoft Store). This Lets You Execute A Program Forward And Backwards. After Capturing A Trace, You Can Set Breakpoints And Step Through Code As Normal, But Also Provides 'backwards' Commands (g-, T-, P-) So That You Can Go Back And Forth Through The Execution. It Is Especially Useful To Set Data Breakpoints (ba Command) And Reverse Continuing, So You Can See When A Certain Variable Was Last Changed To Its Current Value. Chromium Specifics: The Type Of Injection The Time Travel Tracer Needs To Perform Is Incompatible With The Chromium Sandbox. In Order To Record A Trace, You'll Need To Run With --no-sandbox. Chromium Cannot Run Elevated With Administrator Privileges, So The "Launch Executable (advance)" Option Won't Work, You'll Need To Attach After The Process Has Already Launched Via The Checkbox In The Bottom Right. If You Need To Record Startup-like Things, You'll Have To Use --{browser,gpu,renderer,utility}-startup-dialog, Then Attach (and Hope The Relevant Code Hasn't Executed Before That Point). JsDbg -- Data Structure Visualization You Can Install JsDbg As A Plugin For WinDbg Or Visual Studio. It Interactively Lets You Look At Data Structures (such As The DOM Tree, Accessibility Tree, Layout Object Tree, And Others) In A Web Browser As You Debug. See The JsDbg Site For Some Screen Shots And Usage Examples. This Also Works When Examining Memory Dumps (though Not Minidumps), And Also Works Together With Time Travel Debugging. Visual Studio Hints Debug Visualizers Chrome's Custom Debug Visualizers Should Be Added To The Pdb Files And Automatically Picked Up By Visual Studio. The Definitions Are In //tools/win/DebugVisualizers If You Need To Modify Them (the BUILD.gn File There Has Additional Instructions). Don't Step Into Trivial Functions The Debugger Can Be Configured To Automatically Not Step Into Functions Based On Regular Expression. Edit Default.natstepfilter In The Following Directory: For Visual Studio 2015: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers (for All Users) Or %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2015\Visualizers (for The Current User Only) For Visual Studio 2017 Pro: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Professional\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers (for All Users) Or %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2017\Visualizers (for The Current User Only) Add Regular Expressions Of Functions To Not Step Into. Remember To Regex-escape And XML-escape Them, E.g. < For < And \. For A Literal Dot. Example: Operator New NoStepInto Operator Delete NoStepInto Std::.* NoStepInto WTF::.*Ptr ::.* NoStepInto This File Is Read At Start Of A Debugging Session (F5), So You Don't Need To Restart Visual Studio After Changing It. More Info: Microsoft Email Thread V8 And Chromium V8 Supports Many Command-line Flags That Are Useful For Debugging. V8 Command-line Flags Can Be Set Via The Chromium Command-line Flag --js-flags; For Instance: Chrome.exe --js-flags="--trace_exception --heap_stats" Note That Some V8 Command-line Flags Exist Only In The Debug Build Of V8. For A List Of All V8 Flags Try: Chrome.exe --js-flags="--help" Graphics Debugging GPU Acceleration Of Rendering Can Be More Easily Debugged With Tools. See: Graphics Debugging In Visual Studio 2013 Graphical Debugging With NVIDIA NSight Debugging On Another Machine Sometimes It's Useful To Debug Installation And Execution On A Machine Other Than Your Primary Build Box. To Run The Installer On Said Other Machine, First Build The Mini_installer Target On Your Main Build Machine (e.g., Autoninja -C Out\Debug Mini_installer). Next, On The Debug Machine: Make The Build Machine's Build Volume Available On The Debug Machine Either By Mounting It Locally (e.g., Z:\) Or By Crafting A UNC Path To It (e.g., \\builder\src) Open Up A Command Prompt And Change To A Local Disk Run Src\tools\win\copy-installer.bat In The Remote Checkout By Way Of The Mount (e.g., Z:\PATHTOCHECKOUT\src\...) Or UNC Path (e.g., \\builder\src\...). This Will Copy The Installer, DLLs, And PDBs Into Your Debug Machine's C:\out Or C:\build (depending On If You're Rocking The Component=shared_library Build Or Not) Run C:\out\Debug\mini_installer.exe With The Flags Of Your Choice To Install Chrome. This Can Take Some Time, Especially On A Slow Machine. Watch The Task Manager And Wait Until Mini_installer.exe Exits Before Trying To Launch Chrome (by Way Of The Shortcut(s) Created By The Installer) For Extra Pleasure, Add C:\out\Debug To Your _NT_SYMBOL_PATH Environment Variable Consider Reading The Documentation At The Top Of Copy-installer.bat To See How You Can Run It. It Tries To Be Smart And Copy The Right Things, But You May Need To Be Explicit (e.g., "copy-installer.bat Out Debug"). It Is Safe To Re-run The Script To Copy Only Modified Files (after A Rebuild, For Example). You Can Also Use The Zip Action Of The Isolate Scripts (tools\mb\mb.py) To Package All The Files For A Target Into A Single Zip File, For Example: Python Tools\mb\mb.py Zip Out/Release Base_unittests Base_unittests.zip Finding All Memory Allocations It Is Possible To Use Heap Snapshots To Get Call Stacks On All Outstanding Allocations That Use The OS Heap. This Works Particularly Well If Heap Snapshots Are Started As Soon As The Chrome Browser Process Is Created, But Before It Starts Running. Details Can Be Found In This Batch File. However, With PartitionAlloc Everywhere Most Chromium Allocations No Longer Use The Windows Heap So This Will Only Find A Subset Of Allocations, Mostly From OS DLLs. Find Memory Leaks Note: As With Heap Snapshots The Utility Of UMDH Is Greatly Reduced Now Because PartitionAlloc Everywhere Has Mostly Replaced The Windows Heap. The Windows Heap Manager Has A Really Useful Debug Flag, Where It Can Be Asked To Capture And Store A Stack Trace With Every Allocation. The Tool To Scrape These Stack Traces Out Of Processes Is UMDH, Which Comes With WinDbg. UMDH Is Great. It Will Capture A Snapshot Of The Heap State As Many Times As You Like, And It'll Do It Fairly Quickly. You Then Run It Again Against Either A Single Snapshot, Or A Pair Of Snapshots, At Which Time It'll Symbolize The Stack Traces And Aggregate Usage Up To Unique Stack Traces. Turning On The User Stack Trace Database For Chrome.exe With Gflags.exe Makes It Run Unbearably Slowly; However, Turning On The User Stack Trace Database On For The Browser Alone Is Just Fine. While It's Possible To Turn On The User Stack Database With The "!gflag" Debugging Extension, It's Too Late To Do This By The Time The Initial Debugger Breakpoint Hits. The Only Reasonable Way To Do This Is To Launch GFlags.exe, Enable The User Stack Trace Database (per Image Below), Launch Chrome Under The Debugger. Set A Breakpont When Chrome.dll Loads With "sxe Ld Chrome.dll". Step Up, To Allow Chrome.dll To Initialize. Disable The Stack Trace Database In GFlags.exe. Continue Chrome, Optionally Detaching The Debugger. Image GFlags.exe Settings For User Mode Stack Trace Database. If You Then Ever Suffer A Browser Memory Leak, You Can Snarf A Dump Of The Process With Umdh -p: > Chrome-browser-leak-umdh-dump.txt Which Can Then Typically Be "trivially" Analyzed To Find The Culprit. Miscellaneous Note That By Default Application Verifier Only Works With Non-official Builds Of Chromium. To Use Application Verifier On Official Builds You Need To Add --disable-features=RendererCodeIntegrity To Avoid Sandbox Crashes In Renderer Processes. See Crbug.com/1004989 For Details. See Also This Page. Application Verifier Is A Free Tool From Microsoft (available As Part Of The Windows SDK) That Can Be Used To Flush Out Programming Errors. Starting With M68 Application Verifier Can Be Enabled For Chrome.exe Without Needing To Disable The Sandbox. After Adding Chrome.exe To The List Of Applications To Be Stressed You Need To Expand The List Of Basics Checks And Disable The Leak Checks. You May Also Need To Disable Handles And Locks Checks Depending On Your Graphics Driver And Specific Chrome Version, But The Eventual Goal Is To Have Chrome Run With Handles And Locks Checks Enabled. When Bugs Are Found Chrome Will Trigger A Breakpoint So Running All Chrome Processes Under A Debugger Is Recommended. Chrome Will Run Much More Slowly Because Application Verifier Puts Every Heap Allocation On A Separate Page. Note That With PartitionAlloc Everywhere Most Chromium Allocations Don't Actually Go Through The Windows Heap And Are Therefore Unaffected By Application Verifier. You Can Check The Undocumented 'Cuzz' Checkbox In Application Verifier To Get The Windows Thread Scheduler To Add Some Extra Randomness In Order To Help Expose Race Conditions In Your Code. To Put A Breakpoint On CreateFile(), Add This Break Point: {,,kernel32.dll}_CreateFileW@28 {,,kernel32.dll} Specifies The DLL (context Operator). _ Prefix Means Extern "C". @28 Postfix Means _stdcall With The Stack Pop At The End Of The Function. I.e. The Number Of Arguments In BYTES. You Can Use DebugView From SysInternals Or Sawbuck To View LOG() Messages That Normally Go To Stderr On POSIX.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  The Chromium Logo The Chromium Projects Home Chromium ChromiumOS Quick Links Report Bugs Discuss Other Sites Chromium Blog Google Chrome Extensions Except As Otherwise Noted, The Content Of This Page Is Licensed Under A Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, And Examples Are Licensed Under The BSD License. Privacy Edit This Page For Developers > How-Tos > Debugging Chromium On Windows First See Get The Code For Checkout And Build Instructions. Getting Started You Can Use Visual Studio's Built-in Debugger Or WinDBG To Debug Chromium. You Don't Need To Use The IDE To Build In Order To Use The Debugger: Autoninja Is Used To Build Chromium And Most Developers Invoke It From A Command Prompt, And Then Open The IDE For Debugging As Necessary. To Start Debugging An Already-built Executable With Visual Studio Just Launch Visual Studio (2019 Or Higher) And Select File-> Open-> Project/Solution (Ctrl+Shift+O) And Select The Executable Of Interest. This Will Create A Solution With That Executable As The 'project'. You Can Then Launch The Debugger With F5 Or F11 Or From The Debug Menu. If You Right-click On The Executable In Solution Explorer And Select Properties Then You Can Edit Things Such As The Executable Path, Command-line Arguments, And Working Directory. You Can Add Additional Executables To The Solution By Using File-> Add-> Existing Project And Selecting Another Already-built Executable. You Can Select Which One To Debug By Right-clicking On One Of Them In Solution Explorer And Selecting Set As Startup Project. When Your Solution File Is Customized To Your Taste You Can Save It To A Directory Such As Out\solutions. Saving It There Helps Ensure That Relative Paths To Source Files, Printed From Build Commands, Will Correctly Identify The Source Files. The Tools Menu Can Be Used To Add Commands To Do Things Like Invoke Autoninja To Build Chrome, Compile The Selected Source File, Or Other Things. Visual Studio 2017 Is Not Recommended For Debugging Of Chromium - Use A Newer Version For Best Performance And Stability. Symbol_level=2 Is The Default On Windows And Gives Full Debugging Information With Types, Locals, Globals, Function Names, And Source/line Information. Symbol_level=1 Creates Smaller PDBs With Just Function Names, And Source/line Information - Source-level Debugging Is Still Supported (new From June 2019), But Local Variables And Type Information Are Missing. Symbol_level=0 Gives Extremely Limited Debugging Abilities, Mostly Just Viewing Call Stacks When Chromium Crashes. Browsing Source Code If You Use A Solution File Generated By Gn (gn Gen --ide=vs) Then Intellisense May Help You Navigate The Code. If This Doesn't Work Or If You Use A Solution Created As Above Then You May Want To Install VsChromium To Help Navigate The Code, As Well As Using Https://source.chromium.org. Profiles It's A Good Idea To Use A Different Chrome Profile For Your Debugging. If You Are Debugging Google Chrome Branded Builds, Or Use A Chromium Build As Your Primary Browser, The Profiles Can Collide So You Can't Run Both At Once, And Your Stable Browser Might See Profile Versions From The Future (Google Chrome And Chromium Use Different Profile Directories By Default So Won't Collide). Use The Command-line Option: --user-data-dir=C:\tmp\my_debug_profile (replace The Path As Necessary) Using The IDE, Go To The Debugging Tab Of The Properties Of The Chrome Project, And Set The Command Arguments. Chrome Debug Log Enable Chrome Debug Logging To A File By Passing --enable-logging --v=1 Command-line Flags At Startup. Debug Builds Place The Chrome_debug.log File In The Out\Debug Directory. Release Builds Place The File In The Top Level Of The User Data Chromium App Directory, Which Is OS-version-dependent. For More Information, See Logging And User Data Directory Details. Symbol Server If You Are Debugging Official Google Chrome Release Builds, Use The Symbol Server: Https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com In Visual Studio, This Goes In Tools > Options Under Debugging > Symbols. You Should Set Up A Local Cache In A Empty Directory On Your Computer. In Windbg You Can Add This To Your Symbol Server Search Path With The Command Below, Where C:\symbols Is A Local Cache Directory: .sympath+ SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Alternately, You Can Set The _NT_SYMBOL_PATH Environment Variable To Include Both The Microsoft And Google Symbol Servers - VS, Windbg, And Other Tools Should Both Respect This Environment Variable: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Note That Symbol Servers Will Let The Debuggers Download Both The PE Files (DLLs And EXEs) And The PDB Files. Chrome Often Loads Third Party Libraries And Partial Symbols For Some Of These Are Also Public. For Example: AMD: Https://download.amd.com/dir/bin Nvidia: Https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/ Intel: Https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ For Example, For Completeness, The Following Symbol Server Environment Variable Will Resolve All Of The Above Sources - But This Is More Than Is Normally Needed: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://download.amd.com/dir/bin;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ Source Indexing You Should Set Up Source Indexing In Your Debugger (.srcfix In Windbg, Tools-> Options-> Debugging-> General-> Enable Source Server Support In Visual Studio) So That The Correct Source Files Will Automatically Be Downloaded Based On Information In The Downloaded Symbols. Additionally, You Must Have Python In Your Path In Order For The Command That Fetches Source Files To Succeed; Launching The Debugger From The Same Environment As Where You Build Chromium Is An Easy Way To Ensure It's Present. This Is Highly Recommended When Debugging Released Google Chrome Builds Or Looking At Crash Dumps. Having The Correct Version Of The Source Files Automatically Show Up Saves Significant Time So You Should Definitely Set This. Multi-process Issues Chromium Can Be Challenging To Debug Because Of Its Multi-process Architecture. When You Select Run In The Debugger, Only The Main Browser Process Will Be Debugged. The Code That Actually Renders Web Pages (the Renderer) And The Plugins Will Be In Separate Processes That's Not (yet!) Being Debugged. The ProcessExplorer Tool Has A Process Tree View Where You Can See How These Processes Are Related. You Can Also Get The Process IDs Associated With Each Tab From The Chrome Task Manager (right-click On An Empty Area Of The Window Title Bar To Open). Automatically Attach To Child Processes There Are Two Visual Studio Extensions That Enable The Debugger To Automatically Attach To All Chrome Processes, So You Can Debug All Of Chrome At Once. Microsoft's Child Process Debugging Power Tool Is A Standalone Extension For This, And VsChromium Is Another Option That Bundles Many Other Additional Features. In Addition To Installing One Of These Extensions, You Must Run Visual Studio As Administrator, Or It Will Silently Fail To Attach To Some Of Chrome's Child Processes. Single-process Mode One Way To Debug Issues Is To Run Chromium In Single-process Mode. This Will Allow You To See The Entire State Of The Program Without Extra Work (although It Will Still Have Many Threads). To Use Single-process Mode, Add The Command-line Flag --single-process This Approach Isn't Perfect Because Some Problems Won't Manifest Themselves In This Mode And Some Features Don't Work And Worker Threads Are Still Spawned Into New Processes. Manually Attaching To A Child Process You Can Attach To The Running Child Processes With The Debugger. Select Tools > Attach To Process And Click The Chrome.exe Process You Want To Attach To. Before Attaching, Make Sure You Have Selected Only Native Code When Attaching To The Process This Is Done By Clicking Select... In The Attach To Process Window And Only Checking Native. If You Forget This, It May Attempt To Attach In "WebKit" Mode To Debug JavaScript, And You'll Get An Error Message "An Operation Is Not Legal In The Current State." You Can Now Debug The Two Processes As If They Were One. When You Are Debugging Multiple Processes, Open The Debug > Windows > Processes Window To Switch Between Them. Sometimes You Are Debugging Something That Only Happens On Startup, And Want To See The Child Process As Soon As It Starts. Use: --renderer-startup-dialog --no-sandbox You Have To Disable The Sandbox Or The Dialog Box Will Be Prohibited From Showing. When The Dialog Appears, Visit Tools > Attach To Process And Attach To The Process Showing The Renderer Startup Dialog. Now You're Debugging In The Renderer And Can Continue Execution By Pressing OK In The Dialog. Startup Dialogs Also Exist For Other Child Process Types: --gpu-startup-dialog, --ppapi-startup-dialog, --utility-startup-dialog, --plugin-startup-dialog (for NPAPI). For Utilities, You Can Add A Service Type --utility-startup-dialog=data_decoder.mojom.DataDecoderService. You Can Also Try The Vs-chromium Plug-in To Attach To The Right Processes. Semi-automatically Attaching The Debugger To Child Processes The Following Flags Cause Child Processes To Wait For 60 Seconds In A Busy Loop For A Debugger To Attach To The Process. Once Either Condition Is True, It Continues On; No Exception Is Thrown. --wait-for-debugger-children[=filter] The Filter, If Provided, Will Fire Only If It Matches The --type Parameter To The Process. Values Include Renderer, Plugin (for NPAPI), Ppapi, Gpu-process, And Utility. When Using This Option, It May Be Helpful To Limit The Number Of Renderer Processes Spawned, Using: --renderer-process-limit=1 Image File Execution Options Using Image File Execution Options (IFEO) Will Not Work Because CreateProcess() Returns The Handle To The Debugger Process Instead Of The Intended Child Process. There Are Also Issues With The Sandbox. Time Travel Debugging You Can Do Time Travel Debugging Using WinDbg Preview (must Be Installed From The Microsoft Store). This Lets You Execute A Program Forward And Backwards. After Capturing A Trace, You Can Set Breakpoints And Step Through Code As Normal, But Also Provides 'backwards' Commands (g-, T-, P-) So That You Can Go Back And Forth Through The Execution. It Is Especially Useful To Set Data Breakpoints (ba Command) And Reverse Continuing, So You Can See When A Certain Variable Was Last Changed To Its Current Value. Chromium Specifics: The Type Of Injection The Time Travel Tracer Needs To Perform Is Incompatible With The Chromium Sandbox. In Order To Record A Trace, You'll Need To Run With --no-sandbox. Chromium Cannot Run Elevated With Administrator Privileges, So The "Launch Executable (advance)" Option Won't Work, You'll Need To Attach After The Process Has Already Launched Via The Checkbox In The Bottom Right. If You Need To Record Startup-like Things, You'll Have To Use --{browser,gpu,renderer,utility}-startup-dialog, Then Attach (and Hope The Relevant Code Hasn't Executed Before That Point). JsDbg -- Data Structure Visualization You Can Install JsDbg As A Plugin For WinDbg Or Visual Studio. It Interactively Lets You Look At Data Structures (such As The DOM Tree, Accessibility Tree, Layout Object Tree, And Others) In A Web Browser As You Debug. See The JsDbg Site For Some Screen Shots And Usage Examples. This Also Works When Examining Memory Dumps (though Not Minidumps), And Also Works Together With Time Travel Debugging. Visual Studio Hints Debug Visualizers Chrome's Custom Debug Visualizers Should Be Added To The Pdb Files And Automatically Picked Up By Visual Studio. The Definitions Are In //tools/win/DebugVisualizers If You Need To Modify Them (the BUILD.gn File There Has Additional Instructions). Don't Step Into Trivial Functions The Debugger Can Be Configured To Automatically Not Step Into Functions Based On Regular Expression. Edit Default.natstepfilter In The Following Directory: For Visual Studio 2015: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers (for All Users) Or %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2015\Visualizers (for The Current User Only) For Visual Studio 2017 Pro: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Professional\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers (for All Users) Or %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2017\Visualizers (for The Current User Only) Add Regular Expressions Of Functions To Not Step Into. Remember To Regex-escape And XML-escape Them, E.g. < For < And \. For A Literal Dot. Example: Operator New NoStepInto Operator Delete NoStepInto Std::.* NoStepInto WTF::.*Ptr ::.* NoStepInto This File Is Read At Start Of A Debugging Session (F5), So You Don't Need To Restart Visual Studio After Changing It. More Info: Microsoft Email Thread V8 And Chromium V8 Supports Many Command-line Flags That Are Useful For Debugging. V8 Command-line Flags Can Be Set Via The Chromium Command-line Flag --js-flags; For Instance: Chrome.exe --js-flags="--trace_exception --heap_stats" Note That Some V8 Command-line Flags Exist Only In The Debug Build Of V8. For A List Of All V8 Flags Try: Chrome.exe --js-flags="--help" Graphics Debugging GPU Acceleration Of Rendering Can Be More Easily Debugged With Tools. See: Graphics Debugging In Visual Studio 2013 Graphical Debugging With NVIDIA NSight Debugging On Another Machine Sometimes It's Useful To Debug Installation And Execution On A Machine Other Than Your Primary Build Box. To Run The Installer On Said Other Machine, First Build The Mini_installer Target On Your Main Build Machine (e.g., Autoninja -C Out\Debug Mini_installer). Next, On The Debug Machine: Make The Build Machine's Build Volume Available On The Debug Machine Either By Mounting It Locally (e.g., Z:\) Or By Crafting A UNC Path To It (e.g., \\builder\src) Open Up A Command Prompt And Change To A Local Disk Run Src\tools\win\copy-installer.bat In The Remote Checkout By Way Of The Mount (e.g., Z:\PATHTOCHECKOUT\src\...) Or UNC Path (e.g., \\builder\src\...). This Will Copy The Installer, DLLs, And PDBs Into Your Debug Machine's C:\out Or C:\build (depending On If You're Rocking The Component=shared_library Build Or Not) Run C:\out\Debug\mini_installer.exe With The Flags Of Your Choice To Install Chrome. This Can Take Some Time, Especially On A Slow Machine. Watch The Task Manager And Wait Until Mini_installer.exe Exits Before Trying To Launch Chrome (by Way Of The Shortcut(s) Created By The Installer) For Extra Pleasure, Add C:\out\Debug To Your _NT_SYMBOL_PATH Environment Variable Consider Reading The Documentation At The Top Of Copy-installer.bat To See How You Can Run It. It Tries To Be Smart And Copy The Right Things, But You May Need To Be Explicit (e.g., "copy-installer.bat Out Debug"). It Is Safe To Re-run The Script To Copy Only Modified Files (after A Rebuild, For Example). You Can Also Use The Zip Action Of The Isolate Scripts (tools\mb\mb.py) To Package All The Files For A Target Into A Single Zip File, For Example: Python Tools\mb\mb.py Zip Out/Release Base_unittests Base_unittests.zip Finding All Memory Allocations It Is Possible To Use Heap Snapshots To Get Call Stacks On All Outstanding Allocations That Use The OS Heap. This Works Particularly Well If Heap Snapshots Are Started As Soon As The Chrome Browser Process Is Created, But Before It Starts Running. Details Can Be Found In This Batch File. However, With PartitionAlloc Everywhere Most Chromium Allocations No Longer Use The Windows Heap So This Will Only Find A Subset Of Allocations, Mostly From OS DLLs. Find Memory Leaks Note: As With Heap Snapshots The Utility Of UMDH Is Greatly Reduced Now Because PartitionAlloc Everywhere Has Mostly Replaced The Windows Heap. The Windows Heap Manager Has A Really Useful Debug Flag, Where It Can Be Asked To Capture And Store A Stack Trace With Every Allocation. The Tool To Scrape These Stack Traces Out Of Processes Is UMDH, Which Comes With WinDbg. UMDH Is Great. It Will Capture A Snapshot Of The Heap State As Many Times As You Like, And It'll Do It Fairly Quickly. You Then Run It Again Against Either A Single Snapshot, Or A Pair Of Snapshots, At Which Time It'll Symbolize The Stack Traces And Aggregate Usage Up To Unique Stack Traces. Turning On The User Stack Trace Database For Chrome.exe With Gflags.exe Makes It Run Unbearably Slowly; However, Turning On The User Stack Trace Database On For The Browser Alone Is Just Fine. While It's Possible To Turn On The User Stack Database With The "!gflag" Debugging Extension, It's Too Late To Do This By The Time The Initial Debugger Breakpoint Hits. The Only Reasonable Way To Do This Is To Launch GFlags.exe, Enable The User Stack Trace Database (per Image Below), Launch Chrome Under The Debugger. Set A Breakpont When Chrome.dll Loads With "sxe Ld Chrome.dll". Step Up, To Allow Chrome.dll To Initialize. Disable The Stack Trace Database In GFlags.exe. Continue Chrome, Optionally Detaching The Debugger. Image GFlags.exe Settings For User Mode Stack Trace Database. If You Then Ever Suffer A Browser Memory Leak, You Can Snarf A Dump Of The Process With Umdh -p: > Chrome-browser-leak-umdh-dump.txt Which Can Then Typically Be "trivially" Analyzed To Find The Culprit. Miscellaneous Note That By Default Application Verifier Only Works With Non-official Builds Of Chromium. To Use Application Verifier On Official Builds You Need To Add --disable-features=RendererCodeIntegrity To Avoid Sandbox Crashes In Renderer Processes. See Crbug.com/1004989 For Details. See Also This Page. Application Verifier Is A Free Tool From Microsoft (available As Part Of The Windows SDK) That Can Be Used To Flush Out Programming Errors. Starting With M68 Application Verifier Can Be Enabled For Chrome.exe Without Needing To Disable The Sandbox. After Adding Chrome.exe To The List Of Applications To Be Stressed You Need To Expand The List Of Basics Checks And Disable The Leak Checks. You May Also Need To Disable Handles And Locks Checks Depending On Your Graphics Driver And Specific Chrome Version, But The Eventual Goal Is To Have Chrome Run With Handles And Locks Checks Enabled. When Bugs Are Found Chrome Will Trigger A Breakpoint So Running All Chrome Processes Under A Debugger Is Recommended. Chrome Will Run Much More Slowly Because Application Verifier Puts Every Heap Allocation On A Separate Page. Note That With PartitionAlloc Everywhere Most Chromium Allocations Don't Actually Go Through The Windows Heap And Are Therefore Unaffected By Application Verifier. You Can Check The Undocumented 'Cuzz' Checkbox In Application Verifier To Get The Windows Thread Scheduler To Add Some Extra Randomness In Order To Help Expose Race Conditions In Your Code. To Put A Breakpoint On CreateFile(), Add This Break Point: {,,kernel32.dll}_CreateFileW@28 {,,kernel32.dll} Specifies The DLL (context Operator). _ Prefix Means Extern "C". @28 Postfix Means _stdcall With The Stack Pop At The End Of The Function. I.e. The Number Of Arguments In BYTES. You Can Use DebugView From SysInternals Or Sawbuck To View LOG() Messages That Normally Go To Stderr On POSIX.

“The Chromium Logo The Chromium Projects Home Chromium ChromiumOS Quick Links Report Bugs Discuss Other Sites Chromium Blog Google Chrome Extensions Except As Otherwise Noted, The Content Of This Page Is Licensed Under A Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, And Examples Are Licensed Under The BSD License. Privacy Edit This Page For Developers > How-Tos > Debugging Chromium On Windows First See Get The Code For Checkout And Build Instructions. Getting Started You Can Use Visual Studio's Built-in Debugger Or WinDBG To Debug Chromium. You Don't Need To Use The IDE To Build In Order To Use The Debugger: Autoninja Is Used To Build Chromium And Most Developers Invoke It From A Command Prompt, And Then Open The IDE For Debugging As Necessary. To Start Debugging An Already-built Executable With Visual Studio Just Launch Visual Studio (2019 Or Higher) And Select File-> Open-> Project/Solution (Ctrl+Shift+O) And Select The Executable Of Interest. This Will Create A Solution With That Executable As The 'project'. You Can Then Launch The Debugger With F5 Or F11 Or From The Debug Menu. If You Right-click On The Executable In Solution Explorer And Select Properties Then You Can Edit Things Such As The Executable Path, Command-line Arguments, And Working Directory. You Can Add Additional Executables To The Solution By Using File-> Add-> Existing Project And Selecting Another Already-built Executable. You Can Select Which One To Debug By Right-clicking On One Of Them In Solution Explorer And Selecting Set As Startup Project. When Your Solution File Is Customized To Your Taste You Can Save It To A Directory Such As Out\solutions. Saving It There Helps Ensure That Relative Paths To Source Files, Printed From Build Commands, Will Correctly Identify The Source Files. The Tools Menu Can Be Used To Add Commands To Do Things Like Invoke Autoninja To Build Chrome, Compile The Selected Source File, Or Other Things. Visual Studio 2017 Is Not Recommended For Debugging Of Chromium - Use A Newer Version For Best Performance And Stability. Symbol_level=2 Is The Default On Windows And Gives Full Debugging Information With Types, Locals, Globals, Function Names, And Source/line Information. Symbol_level=1 Creates Smaller PDBs With Just Function Names, And Source/line Information - Source-level Debugging Is Still Supported (new From June 2019), But Local Variables And Type Information Are Missing. Symbol_level=0 Gives Extremely Limited Debugging Abilities, Mostly Just Viewing Call Stacks When Chromium Crashes. Browsing Source Code If You Use A Solution File Generated By Gn (gn Gen --ide=vs) Then Intellisense May Help You Navigate The Code. If This Doesn't Work Or If You Use A Solution Created As Above Then You May Want To Install VsChromium To Help Navigate The Code, As Well As Using Https://source.chromium.org. Profiles It's A Good Idea To Use A Different Chrome Profile For Your Debugging. If You Are Debugging Google Chrome Branded Builds, Or Use A Chromium Build As Your Primary Browser, The Profiles Can Collide So You Can't Run Both At Once, And Your Stable Browser Might See Profile Versions From The Future (Google Chrome And Chromium Use Different Profile Directories By Default So Won't Collide). Use The Command-line Option: --user-data-dir=C:\tmp\my_debug_profile (replace The Path As Necessary) Using The IDE, Go To The Debugging Tab Of The Properties Of The Chrome Project, And Set The Command Arguments. Chrome Debug Log Enable Chrome Debug Logging To A File By Passing --enable-logging --v=1 Command-line Flags At Startup. Debug Builds Place The Chrome_debug.log File In The Out\Debug Directory. Release Builds Place The File In The Top Level Of The User Data Chromium App Directory, Which Is OS-version-dependent. For More Information, See Logging And User Data Directory Details. Symbol Server If You Are Debugging Official Google Chrome Release Builds, Use The Symbol Server: Https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com In Visual Studio, This Goes In Tools > Options Under Debugging > Symbols. You Should Set Up A Local Cache In A Empty Directory On Your Computer. In Windbg You Can Add This To Your Symbol Server Search Path With The Command Below, Where C:\symbols Is A Local Cache Directory: .sympath+ SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Alternately, You Can Set The _NT_SYMBOL_PATH Environment Variable To Include Both The Microsoft And Google Symbol Servers - VS, Windbg, And Other Tools Should Both Respect This Environment Variable: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Note That Symbol Servers Will Let The Debuggers Download Both The PE Files (DLLs And EXEs) And The PDB Files. Chrome Often Loads Third Party Libraries And Partial Symbols For Some Of These Are Also Public. For Example: AMD: Https://download.amd.com/dir/bin Nvidia: Https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/ Intel: Https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ For Example, For Completeness, The Following Symbol Server Environment Variable Will Resolve All Of The Above Sources - But This Is More Than Is Normally Needed: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://download.amd.com/dir/bin;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ Source Indexing You Should Set Up Source Indexing In Your Debugger (.srcfix In Windbg, Tools-> Options-> Debugging-> General-> Enable Source Server Support In Visual Studio) So That The Correct Source Files Will Automatically Be Downloaded Based On Information In The Downloaded Symbols. Additionally, You Must Have Python In Your Path In Order For The Command That Fetches Source Files To Succeed; Launching The Debugger From The Same Environment As Where You Build Chromium Is An Easy Way To Ensure It's Present. This Is Highly Recommended When Debugging Released Google Chrome Builds Or Looking At Crash Dumps. Having The Correct Version Of The Source Files Automatically Show Up Saves Significant Time So You Should Definitely Set This. Multi-process Issues Chromium Can Be Challenging To Debug Because Of Its Multi-process Architecture. When You Select Run In The Debugger, Only The Main Browser Process Will Be Debugged. The Code That Actually Renders Web Pages (the Renderer) And The Plugins Will Be In Separate Processes That's Not (yet!) Being Debugged. The ProcessExplorer Tool Has A Process Tree View Where You Can See How These Processes Are Related. You Can Also Get The Process IDs Associated With Each Tab From The Chrome Task Manager (right-click On An Empty Area Of The Window Title Bar To Open). Automatically Attach To Child Processes There Are Two Visual Studio Extensions That Enable The Debugger To Automatically Attach To All Chrome Processes, So You Can Debug All Of Chrome At Once. Microsoft's Child Process Debugging Power Tool Is A Standalone Extension For This, And VsChromium Is Another Option That Bundles Many Other Additional Features. In Addition To Installing One Of These Extensions, You Must Run Visual Studio As Administrator, Or It Will Silently Fail To Attach To Some Of Chrome's Child Processes. Single-process Mode One Way To Debug Issues Is To Run Chromium In Single-process Mode. This Will Allow You To See The Entire State Of The Program Without Extra Work (although It Will Still Have Many Threads). To Use Single-process Mode, Add The Command-line Flag --single-process This Approach Isn't Perfect Because Some Problems Won't Manifest Themselves In This Mode And Some Features Don't Work And Worker Threads Are Still Spawned Into New Processes. Manually Attaching To A Child Process You Can Attach To The Running Child Processes With The Debugger. Select Tools > Attach To Process And Click The Chrome.exe Process You Want To Attach To. Before Attaching, Make Sure You Have Selected Only Native Code When Attaching To The Process This Is Done By Clicking Select... In The Attach To Process Window And Only Checking Native. If You Forget This, It May Attempt To Attach In "WebKit" Mode To Debug JavaScript, And You'll Get An Error Message "An Operation Is Not Legal In The Current State." You Can Now Debug The Two Processes As If They Were One. When You Are Debugging Multiple Processes, Open The Debug > Windows > Processes Window To Switch Between Them. Sometimes You Are Debugging Something That Only Happens On Startup, And Want To See The Child Process As Soon As It Starts. Use: --renderer-startup-dialog --no-sandbox You Have To Disable The Sandbox Or The Dialog Box Will Be Prohibited From Showing. When The Dialog Appears, Visit Tools > Attach To Process And Attach To The Process Showing The Renderer Startup Dialog. Now You're Debugging In The Renderer And Can Continue Execution By Pressing OK In The Dialog. Startup Dialogs Also Exist For Other Child Process Types: --gpu-startup-dialog, --ppapi-startup-dialog, --utility-startup-dialog, --plugin-startup-dialog (for NPAPI). For Utilities, You Can Add A Service Type --utility-startup-dialog=data_decoder.mojom.DataDecoderService. You Can Also Try The Vs-chromium Plug-in To Attach To The Right Processes. Semi-automatically Attaching The Debugger To Child Processes The Following Flags Cause Child Processes To Wait For 60 Seconds In A Busy Loop For A Debugger To Attach To The Process. Once Either Condition Is True, It Continues On; No Exception Is Thrown. --wait-for-debugger-children[=filter] The Filter, If Provided, Will Fire Only If It Matches The --type Parameter To The Process. Values Include Renderer, Plugin (for NPAPI), Ppapi, Gpu-process, And Utility. When Using This Option, It May Be Helpful To Limit The Number Of Renderer Processes Spawned, Using: --renderer-process-limit=1 Image File Execution Options Using Image File Execution Options (IFEO) Will Not Work Because CreateProcess() Returns The Handle To The Debugger Process Instead Of The Intended Child Process. There Are Also Issues With The Sandbox. Time Travel Debugging You Can Do Time Travel Debugging Using WinDbg Preview (must Be Installed From The Microsoft Store). This Lets You Execute A Program Forward And Backwards. After Capturing A Trace, You Can Set Breakpoints And Step Through Code As Normal, But Also Provides 'backwards' Commands (g-, T-, P-) So That You Can Go Back And Forth Through The Execution. It Is Especially Useful To Set Data Breakpoints (ba Command) And Reverse Continuing, So You Can See When A Certain Variable Was Last Changed To Its Current Value. Chromium Specifics: The Type Of Injection The Time Travel Tracer Needs To Perform Is Incompatible With The Chromium Sandbox. In Order To Record A Trace, You'll Need To Run With --no-sandbox. Chromium Cannot Run Elevated With Administrator Privileges, So The "Launch Executable (advance)" Option Won't Work, You'll Need To Attach After The Process Has Already Launched Via The Checkbox In The Bottom Right. If You Need To Record Startup-like Things, You'll Have To Use --{browser,gpu,renderer,utility}-startup-dialog, Then Attach (and Hope The Relevant Code Hasn't Executed Before That Point). JsDbg -- Data Structure Visualization You Can Install JsDbg As A Plugin For WinDbg Or Visual Studio. It Interactively Lets You Look At Data Structures (such As The DOM Tree, Accessibility Tree, Layout Object Tree, And Others) In A Web Browser As You Debug. See The JsDbg Site For Some Screen Shots And Usage Examples. This Also Works When Examining Memory Dumps (though Not Minidumps), And Also Works Together With Time Travel Debugging. Visual Studio Hints Debug Visualizers Chrome's Custom Debug Visualizers Should Be Added To The Pdb Files And Automatically Picked Up By Visual Studio. The Definitions Are In //tools/win/DebugVisualizers If You Need To Modify Them (the BUILD.gn File There Has Additional Instructions). Don't Step Into Trivial Functions The Debugger Can Be Configured To Automatically Not Step Into Functions Based On Regular Expression. Edit Default.natstepfilter In The Following Directory: For Visual Studio 2015: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers (for All Users) Or %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2015\Visualizers (for The Current User Only) For Visual Studio 2017 Pro: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Professional\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers (for All Users) Or %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2017\Visualizers (for The Current User Only) Add Regular Expressions Of Functions To Not Step Into. Remember To Regex-escape And XML-escape Them, E.g. < For < And \. For A Literal Dot. Example: Operator New NoStepInto Operator Delete NoStepInto Std::.* NoStepInto WTF::.*Ptr ::.* NoStepInto This File Is Read At Start Of A Debugging Session (F5), So You Don't Need To Restart Visual Studio After Changing It. More Info: Microsoft Email Thread V8 And Chromium V8 Supports Many Command-line Flags That Are Useful For Debugging. V8 Command-line Flags Can Be Set Via The Chromium Command-line Flag --js-flags; For Instance: Chrome.exe --js-flags="--trace_exception --heap_stats" Note That Some V8 Command-line Flags Exist Only In The Debug Build Of V8. For A List Of All V8 Flags Try: Chrome.exe --js-flags="--help" Graphics Debugging GPU Acceleration Of Rendering Can Be More Easily Debugged With Tools. See: Graphics Debugging In Visual Studio 2013 Graphical Debugging With NVIDIA NSight Debugging On Another Machine Sometimes It's Useful To Debug Installation And Execution On A Machine Other Than Your Primary Build Box. To Run The Installer On Said Other Machine, First Build The Mini_installer Target On Your Main Build Machine (e.g., Autoninja -C Out\Debug Mini_installer). Next, On The Debug Machine: Make The Build Machine's Build Volume Available On The Debug Machine Either By Mounting It Locally (e.g., Z:\) Or By Crafting A UNC Path To It (e.g., \\builder\src) Open Up A Command Prompt And Change To A Local Disk Run Src\tools\win\copy-installer.bat In The Remote Checkout By Way Of The Mount (e.g., Z:\PATHTOCHECKOUT\src\...) Or UNC Path (e.g., \\builder\src\...). This Will Copy The Installer, DLLs, And PDBs Into Your Debug Machine's C:\out Or C:\build (depending On If You're Rocking The Component=shared_library Build Or Not) Run C:\out\Debug\mini_installer.exe With The Flags Of Your Choice To Install Chrome. This Can Take Some Time, Especially On A Slow Machine. Watch The Task Manager And Wait Until Mini_installer.exe Exits Before Trying To Launch Chrome (by Way Of The Shortcut(s) Created By The Installer) For Extra Pleasure, Add C:\out\Debug To Your _NT_SYMBOL_PATH Environment Variable Consider Reading The Documentation At The Top Of Copy-installer.bat To See How You Can Run It. It Tries To Be Smart And Copy The Right Things, But You May Need To Be Explicit (e.g., "copy-installer.bat Out Debug"). It Is Safe To Re-run The Script To Copy Only Modified Files (after A Rebuild, For Example). You Can Also Use The Zip Action Of The Isolate Scripts (tools\mb\mb.py) To Package All The Files For A Target Into A Single Zip File, For Example: Python Tools\mb\mb.py Zip Out/Release Base_unittests Base_unittests.zip Finding All Memory Allocations It Is Possible To Use Heap Snapshots To Get Call Stacks On All Outstanding Allocations That Use The OS Heap. This Works Particularly Well If Heap Snapshots Are Started As Soon As The Chrome Browser Process Is Created, But Before It Starts Running. Details Can Be Found In This Batch File. However, With PartitionAlloc Everywhere Most Chromium Allocations No Longer Use The Windows Heap So This Will Only Find A Subset Of Allocations, Mostly From OS DLLs. Find Memory Leaks Note: As With Heap Snapshots The Utility Of UMDH Is Greatly Reduced Now Because PartitionAlloc Everywhere Has Mostly Replaced The Windows Heap. The Windows Heap Manager Has A Really Useful Debug Flag, Where It Can Be Asked To Capture And Store A Stack Trace With Every Allocation. The Tool To Scrape These Stack Traces Out Of Processes Is UMDH, Which Comes With WinDbg. UMDH Is Great. It Will Capture A Snapshot Of The Heap State As Many Times As You Like, And It'll Do It Fairly Quickly. You Then Run It Again Against Either A Single Snapshot, Or A Pair Of Snapshots, At Which Time It'll Symbolize The Stack Traces And Aggregate Usage Up To Unique Stack Traces. Turning On The User Stack Trace Database For Chrome.exe With Gflags.exe Makes It Run Unbearably Slowly; However, Turning On The User Stack Trace Database On For The Browser Alone Is Just Fine. While It's Possible To Turn On The User Stack Database With The "!gflag" Debugging Extension, It's Too Late To Do This By The Time The Initial Debugger Breakpoint Hits. The Only Reasonable Way To Do This Is To Launch GFlags.exe, Enable The User Stack Trace Database (per Image Below), Launch Chrome Under The Debugger. Set A Breakpont When Chrome.dll Loads With "sxe Ld Chrome.dll". Step Up, To Allow Chrome.dll To Initialize. Disable The Stack Trace Database In GFlags.exe. Continue Chrome, Optionally Detaching The Debugger. Image GFlags.exe Settings For User Mode Stack Trace Database. If You Then Ever Suffer A Browser Memory Leak, You Can Snarf A Dump Of The Process With Umdh -p: > Chrome-browser-leak-umdh-dump.txt Which Can Then Typically Be "trivially" Analyzed To Find The Culprit. Miscellaneous Note That By Default Application Verifier Only Works With Non-official Builds Of Chromium. To Use Application Verifier On Official Builds You Need To Add --disable-features=RendererCodeIntegrity To Avoid Sandbox Crashes In Renderer Processes. See Crbug.com/1004989 For Details. See Also This Page. Application Verifier Is A Free Tool From Microsoft (available As Part Of The Windows SDK) That Can Be Used To Flush Out Programming Errors. Starting With M68 Application Verifier Can Be Enabled For Chrome.exe Without Needing To Disable The Sandbox. After Adding Chrome.exe To The List Of Applications To Be Stressed You Need To Expand The List Of Basics Checks And Disable The Leak Checks. You May Also Need To Disable Handles And Locks Checks Depending On Your Graphics Driver And Specific Chrome Version, But The Eventual Goal Is To Have Chrome Run With Handles And Locks Checks Enabled. When Bugs Are Found Chrome Will Trigger A Breakpoint So Running All Chrome Processes Under A Debugger Is Recommended. Chrome Will Run Much More Slowly Because Application Verifier Puts Every Heap Allocation On A Separate Page. Note That With PartitionAlloc Everywhere Most Chromium Allocations Don't Actually Go Through The Windows Heap And Are Therefore Unaffected By Application Verifier. You Can Check The Undocumented 'Cuzz' Checkbox In Application Verifier To Get The Windows Thread Scheduler To Add Some Extra Randomness In Order To Help Expose Race Conditions In Your Code. To Put A Breakpoint On CreateFile(), Add This Break Point: {,,kernel32.dll}_CreateFileW@28 {,,kernel32.dll} Specifies The DLL (context Operator). _ Prefix Means Extern "C". @28 Postfix Means _stdcall With The Stack Pop At The End Of The Function. I.e. The Number Of Arguments In BYTES. You Can Use DebugView From SysInternals Or Sawbuck To View LOG() Messages That Normally Go To Stderr On POSIX.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 0.33 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 2 times, the file-s went public at Fri Jul 11 2025.

Available formats:
Archive BitTorrent - Metadata - Text -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find The Chromium Logo The Chromium Projects Home Chromium ChromiumOS Quick Links Report Bugs Discuss Other Sites Chromium Blog Google Chrome Extensions Except As Otherwise Noted, The Content Of This Page Is Licensed Under A Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, And Examples Are Licensed Under The BSD License. Privacy Edit This Page For Developers > How-Tos > Debugging Chromium On Windows First See Get The Code For Checkout And Build Instructions. Getting Started You Can Use Visual Studio's Built-in Debugger Or WinDBG To Debug Chromium. You Don't Need To Use The IDE To Build In Order To Use The Debugger: Autoninja Is Used To Build Chromium And Most Developers Invoke It From A Command Prompt, And Then Open The IDE For Debugging As Necessary. To Start Debugging An Already-built Executable With Visual Studio Just Launch Visual Studio (2019 Or Higher) And Select File-> Open-> Project/Solution (Ctrl+Shift+O) And Select The Executable Of Interest. This Will Create A Solution With That Executable As The 'project'. You Can Then Launch The Debugger With F5 Or F11 Or From The Debug Menu. If You Right-click On The Executable In Solution Explorer And Select Properties Then You Can Edit Things Such As The Executable Path, Command-line Arguments, And Working Directory. You Can Add Additional Executables To The Solution By Using File-> Add-> Existing Project And Selecting Another Already-built Executable. You Can Select Which One To Debug By Right-clicking On One Of Them In Solution Explorer And Selecting Set As Startup Project. When Your Solution File Is Customized To Your Taste You Can Save It To A Directory Such As Out\solutions. Saving It There Helps Ensure That Relative Paths To Source Files, Printed From Build Commands, Will Correctly Identify The Source Files. The Tools Menu Can Be Used To Add Commands To Do Things Like Invoke Autoninja To Build Chrome, Compile The Selected Source File, Or Other Things. Visual Studio 2017 Is Not Recommended For Debugging Of Chromium - Use A Newer Version For Best Performance And Stability. Symbol_level=2 Is The Default On Windows And Gives Full Debugging Information With Types, Locals, Globals, Function Names, And Source/line Information. Symbol_level=1 Creates Smaller PDBs With Just Function Names, And Source/line Information - Source-level Debugging Is Still Supported (new From June 2019), But Local Variables And Type Information Are Missing. Symbol_level=0 Gives Extremely Limited Debugging Abilities, Mostly Just Viewing Call Stacks When Chromium Crashes. Browsing Source Code If You Use A Solution File Generated By Gn (gn Gen --ide=vs) Then Intellisense May Help You Navigate The Code. If This Doesn't Work Or If You Use A Solution Created As Above Then You May Want To Install VsChromium To Help Navigate The Code, As Well As Using Https://source.chromium.org. Profiles It's A Good Idea To Use A Different Chrome Profile For Your Debugging. If You Are Debugging Google Chrome Branded Builds, Or Use A Chromium Build As Your Primary Browser, The Profiles Can Collide So You Can't Run Both At Once, And Your Stable Browser Might See Profile Versions From The Future (Google Chrome And Chromium Use Different Profile Directories By Default So Won't Collide). Use The Command-line Option: --user-data-dir=C:\tmp\my_debug_profile (replace The Path As Necessary) Using The IDE, Go To The Debugging Tab Of The Properties Of The Chrome Project, And Set The Command Arguments. Chrome Debug Log Enable Chrome Debug Logging To A File By Passing --enable-logging --v=1 Command-line Flags At Startup. Debug Builds Place The Chrome_debug.log File In The Out\Debug Directory. Release Builds Place The File In The Top Level Of The User Data Chromium App Directory, Which Is OS-version-dependent. For More Information, See Logging And User Data Directory Details. Symbol Server If You Are Debugging Official Google Chrome Release Builds, Use The Symbol Server: Https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com In Visual Studio, This Goes In Tools > Options Under Debugging > Symbols. You Should Set Up A Local Cache In A Empty Directory On Your Computer. In Windbg You Can Add This To Your Symbol Server Search Path With The Command Below, Where C:\symbols Is A Local Cache Directory: .sympath+ SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Alternately, You Can Set The _NT_SYMBOL_PATH Environment Variable To Include Both The Microsoft And Google Symbol Servers - VS, Windbg, And Other Tools Should Both Respect This Environment Variable: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com Note That Symbol Servers Will Let The Debuggers Download Both The PE Files (DLLs And EXEs) And The PDB Files. Chrome Often Loads Third Party Libraries And Partial Symbols For Some Of These Are Also Public. For Example: AMD: Https://download.amd.com/dir/bin Nvidia: Https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/ Intel: Https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ For Example, For Completeness, The Following Symbol Server Environment Variable Will Resolve All Of The Above Sources - But This Is More Than Is Normally Needed: _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://chromium-browser-symsrv.commondatastorage.googleapis.com;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://download.amd.com/dir/bin;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://driver-symbols.nvidia.com/;SRV\*C:\symbols\*https://software.intel.com/sites/downloads/symbols/ Source Indexing You Should Set Up Source Indexing In Your Debugger (.srcfix In Windbg, Tools-> Options-> Debugging-> General-> Enable Source Server Support In Visual Studio) So That The Correct Source Files Will Automatically Be Downloaded Based On Information In The Downloaded Symbols. Additionally, You Must Have Python In Your Path In Order For The Command That Fetches Source Files To Succeed; Launching The Debugger From The Same Environment As Where You Build Chromium Is An Easy Way To Ensure It's Present. This Is Highly Recommended When Debugging Released Google Chrome Builds Or Looking At Crash Dumps. Having The Correct Version Of The Source Files Automatically Show Up Saves Significant Time So You Should Definitely Set This. Multi-process Issues Chromium Can Be Challenging To Debug Because Of Its Multi-process Architecture. When You Select Run In The Debugger, Only The Main Browser Process Will Be Debugged. The Code That Actually Renders Web Pages (the Renderer) And The Plugins Will Be In Separate Processes That's Not (yet!) Being Debugged. The ProcessExplorer Tool Has A Process Tree View Where You Can See How These Processes Are Related. You Can Also Get The Process IDs Associated With Each Tab From The Chrome Task Manager (right-click On An Empty Area Of The Window Title Bar To Open). Automatically Attach To Child Processes There Are Two Visual Studio Extensions That Enable The Debugger To Automatically Attach To All Chrome Processes, So You Can Debug All Of Chrome At Once. Microsoft's Child Process Debugging Power Tool Is A Standalone Extension For This, And VsChromium Is Another Option That Bundles Many Other Additional Features. In Addition To Installing One Of These Extensions, You Must Run Visual Studio As Administrator, Or It Will Silently Fail To Attach To Some Of Chrome's Child Processes. Single-process Mode One Way To Debug Issues Is To Run Chromium In Single-process Mode. This Will Allow You To See The Entire State Of The Program Without Extra Work (although It Will Still Have Many Threads). To Use Single-process Mode, Add The Command-line Flag --single-process This Approach Isn't Perfect Because Some Problems Won't Manifest Themselves In This Mode And Some Features Don't Work And Worker Threads Are Still Spawned Into New Processes. Manually Attaching To A Child Process You Can Attach To The Running Child Processes With The Debugger. Select Tools > Attach To Process And Click The Chrome.exe Process You Want To Attach To. Before Attaching, Make Sure You Have Selected Only Native Code When Attaching To The Process This Is Done By Clicking Select... In The Attach To Process Window And Only Checking Native. If You Forget This, It May Attempt To Attach In "WebKit" Mode To Debug JavaScript, And You'll Get An Error Message "An Operation Is Not Legal In The Current State." You Can Now Debug The Two Processes As If They Were One. When You Are Debugging Multiple Processes, Open The Debug > Windows > Processes Window To Switch Between Them. Sometimes You Are Debugging Something That Only Happens On Startup, And Want To See The Child Process As Soon As It Starts. Use: --renderer-startup-dialog --no-sandbox You Have To Disable The Sandbox Or The Dialog Box Will Be Prohibited From Showing. When The Dialog Appears, Visit Tools > Attach To Process And Attach To The Process Showing The Renderer Startup Dialog. Now You're Debugging In The Renderer And Can Continue Execution By Pressing OK In The Dialog. Startup Dialogs Also Exist For Other Child Process Types: --gpu-startup-dialog, --ppapi-startup-dialog, --utility-startup-dialog, --plugin-startup-dialog (for NPAPI). For Utilities, You Can Add A Service Type --utility-startup-dialog=data_decoder.mojom.DataDecoderService. You Can Also Try The Vs-chromium Plug-in To Attach To The Right Processes. Semi-automatically Attaching The Debugger To Child Processes The Following Flags Cause Child Processes To Wait For 60 Seconds In A Busy Loop For A Debugger To Attach To The Process. Once Either Condition Is True, It Continues On; No Exception Is Thrown. --wait-for-debugger-children[=filter] The Filter, If Provided, Will Fire Only If It Matches The --type Parameter To The Process. Values Include Renderer, Plugin (for NPAPI), Ppapi, Gpu-process, And Utility. When Using This Option, It May Be Helpful To Limit The Number Of Renderer Processes Spawned, Using: --renderer-process-limit=1 Image File Execution Options Using Image File Execution Options (IFEO) Will Not Work Because CreateProcess() Returns The Handle To The Debugger Process Instead Of The Intended Child Process. There Are Also Issues With The Sandbox. Time Travel Debugging You Can Do Time Travel Debugging Using WinDbg Preview (must Be Installed From The Microsoft Store). This Lets You Execute A Program Forward And Backwards. After Capturing A Trace, You Can Set Breakpoints And Step Through Code As Normal, But Also Provides 'backwards' Commands (g-, T-, P-) So That You Can Go Back And Forth Through The Execution. It Is Especially Useful To Set Data Breakpoints (ba Command) And Reverse Continuing, So You Can See When A Certain Variable Was Last Changed To Its Current Value. Chromium Specifics: The Type Of Injection The Time Travel Tracer Needs To Perform Is Incompatible With The Chromium Sandbox. In Order To Record A Trace, You'll Need To Run With --no-sandbox. Chromium Cannot Run Elevated With Administrator Privileges, So The "Launch Executable (advance)" Option Won't Work, You'll Need To Attach After The Process Has Already Launched Via The Checkbox In The Bottom Right. If You Need To Record Startup-like Things, You'll Have To Use --{browser,gpu,renderer,utility}-startup-dialog, Then Attach (and Hope The Relevant Code Hasn't Executed Before That Point). JsDbg -- Data Structure Visualization You Can Install JsDbg As A Plugin For WinDbg Or Visual Studio. It Interactively Lets You Look At Data Structures (such As The DOM Tree, Accessibility Tree, Layout Object Tree, And Others) In A Web Browser As You Debug. See The JsDbg Site For Some Screen Shots And Usage Examples. This Also Works When Examining Memory Dumps (though Not Minidumps), And Also Works Together With Time Travel Debugging. Visual Studio Hints Debug Visualizers Chrome's Custom Debug Visualizers Should Be Added To The Pdb Files And Automatically Picked Up By Visual Studio. The Definitions Are In //tools/win/DebugVisualizers If You Need To Modify Them (the BUILD.gn File There Has Additional Instructions). Don't Step Into Trivial Functions The Debugger Can Be Configured To Automatically Not Step Into Functions Based On Regular Expression. Edit Default.natstepfilter In The Following Directory: For Visual Studio 2015: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers (for All Users) Or %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2015\Visualizers (for The Current User Only) For Visual Studio 2017 Pro: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Professional\Common7\Packages\Debugger\Visualizers (for All Users) Or %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\Visual Studio 2017\Visualizers (for The Current User Only) Add Regular Expressions Of Functions To Not Step Into. Remember To Regex-escape And XML-escape Them, E.g. < For < And \. For A Literal Dot. Example: Operator New NoStepInto Operator Delete NoStepInto Std::.* NoStepInto WTF::.*Ptr ::.* NoStepInto This File Is Read At Start Of A Debugging Session (F5), So You Don't Need To Restart Visual Studio After Changing It. More Info: Microsoft Email Thread V8 And Chromium V8 Supports Many Command-line Flags That Are Useful For Debugging. V8 Command-line Flags Can Be Set Via The Chromium Command-line Flag --js-flags; For Instance: Chrome.exe --js-flags="--trace_exception --heap_stats" Note That Some V8 Command-line Flags Exist Only In The Debug Build Of V8. For A List Of All V8 Flags Try: Chrome.exe --js-flags="--help" Graphics Debugging GPU Acceleration Of Rendering Can Be More Easily Debugged With Tools. See: Graphics Debugging In Visual Studio 2013 Graphical Debugging With NVIDIA NSight Debugging On Another Machine Sometimes It's Useful To Debug Installation And Execution On A Machine Other Than Your Primary Build Box. To Run The Installer On Said Other Machine, First Build The Mini_installer Target On Your Main Build Machine (e.g., Autoninja -C Out\Debug Mini_installer). Next, On The Debug Machine: Make The Build Machine's Build Volume Available On The Debug Machine Either By Mounting It Locally (e.g., Z:\) Or By Crafting A UNC Path To It (e.g., \\builder\src) Open Up A Command Prompt And Change To A Local Disk Run Src\tools\win\copy-installer.bat In The Remote Checkout By Way Of The Mount (e.g., Z:\PATHTOCHECKOUT\src\...) Or UNC Path (e.g., \\builder\src\...). This Will Copy The Installer, DLLs, And PDBs Into Your Debug Machine's C:\out Or C:\build (depending On If You're Rocking The Component=shared_library Build Or Not) Run C:\out\Debug\mini_installer.exe With The Flags Of Your Choice To Install Chrome. This Can Take Some Time, Especially On A Slow Machine. Watch The Task Manager And Wait Until Mini_installer.exe Exits Before Trying To Launch Chrome (by Way Of The Shortcut(s) Created By The Installer) For Extra Pleasure, Add C:\out\Debug To Your _NT_SYMBOL_PATH Environment Variable Consider Reading The Documentation At The Top Of Copy-installer.bat To See How You Can Run It. It Tries To Be Smart And Copy The Right Things, But You May Need To Be Explicit (e.g., "copy-installer.bat Out Debug"). It Is Safe To Re-run The Script To Copy Only Modified Files (after A Rebuild, For Example). You Can Also Use The Zip Action Of The Isolate Scripts (tools\mb\mb.py) To Package All The Files For A Target Into A Single Zip File, For Example: Python Tools\mb\mb.py Zip Out/Release Base_unittests Base_unittests.zip Finding All Memory Allocations It Is Possible To Use Heap Snapshots To Get Call Stacks On All Outstanding Allocations That Use The OS Heap. This Works Particularly Well If Heap Snapshots Are Started As Soon As The Chrome Browser Process Is Created, But Before It Starts Running. Details Can Be Found In This Batch File. However, With PartitionAlloc Everywhere Most Chromium Allocations No Longer Use The Windows Heap So This Will Only Find A Subset Of Allocations, Mostly From OS DLLs. Find Memory Leaks Note: As With Heap Snapshots The Utility Of UMDH Is Greatly Reduced Now Because PartitionAlloc Everywhere Has Mostly Replaced The Windows Heap. The Windows Heap Manager Has A Really Useful Debug Flag, Where It Can Be Asked To Capture And Store A Stack Trace With Every Allocation. The Tool To Scrape These Stack Traces Out Of Processes Is UMDH, Which Comes With WinDbg. UMDH Is Great. It Will Capture A Snapshot Of The Heap State As Many Times As You Like, And It'll Do It Fairly Quickly. You Then Run It Again Against Either A Single Snapshot, Or A Pair Of Snapshots, At Which Time It'll Symbolize The Stack Traces And Aggregate Usage Up To Unique Stack Traces. Turning On The User Stack Trace Database For Chrome.exe With Gflags.exe Makes It Run Unbearably Slowly; However, Turning On The User Stack Trace Database On For The Browser Alone Is Just Fine. While It's Possible To Turn On The User Stack Database With The "!gflag" Debugging Extension, It's Too Late To Do This By The Time The Initial Debugger Breakpoint Hits. The Only Reasonable Way To Do This Is To Launch GFlags.exe, Enable The User Stack Trace Database (per Image Below), Launch Chrome Under The Debugger. Set A Breakpont When Chrome.dll Loads With "sxe Ld Chrome.dll". Step Up, To Allow Chrome.dll To Initialize. Disable The Stack Trace Database In GFlags.exe. Continue Chrome, Optionally Detaching The Debugger. Image GFlags.exe Settings For User Mode Stack Trace Database. If You Then Ever Suffer A Browser Memory Leak, You Can Snarf A Dump Of The Process With Umdh -p: > Chrome-browser-leak-umdh-dump.txt Which Can Then Typically Be "trivially" Analyzed To Find The Culprit. Miscellaneous Note That By Default Application Verifier Only Works With Non-official Builds Of Chromium. To Use Application Verifier On Official Builds You Need To Add --disable-features=RendererCodeIntegrity To Avoid Sandbox Crashes In Renderer Processes. See Crbug.com/1004989 For Details. See Also This Page. Application Verifier Is A Free Tool From Microsoft (available As Part Of The Windows SDK) That Can Be Used To Flush Out Programming Errors. Starting With M68 Application Verifier Can Be Enabled For Chrome.exe Without Needing To Disable The Sandbox. After Adding Chrome.exe To The List Of Applications To Be Stressed You Need To Expand The List Of Basics Checks And Disable The Leak Checks. You May Also Need To Disable Handles And Locks Checks Depending On Your Graphics Driver And Specific Chrome Version, But The Eventual Goal Is To Have Chrome Run With Handles And Locks Checks Enabled. When Bugs Are Found Chrome Will Trigger A Breakpoint So Running All Chrome Processes Under A Debugger Is Recommended. Chrome Will Run Much More Slowly Because Application Verifier Puts Every Heap Allocation On A Separate Page. Note That With PartitionAlloc Everywhere Most Chromium Allocations Don't Actually Go Through The Windows Heap And Are Therefore Unaffected By Application Verifier. You Can Check The Undocumented 'Cuzz' Checkbox In Application Verifier To Get The Windows Thread Scheduler To Add Some Extra Randomness In Order To Help Expose Race Conditions In Your Code. To Put A Breakpoint On CreateFile(), Add This Break Point: {,,kernel32.dll}_CreateFileW@28 {,,kernel32.dll} Specifies The DLL (context Operator). _ Prefix Means Extern "C". @28 Postfix Means _stdcall With The Stack Pop At The End Of The Function. I.e. The Number Of Arguments In BYTES. You Can Use DebugView From SysInternals Or Sawbuck To View LOG() Messages That Normally Go To Stderr On POSIX. at online marketplaces:


12ERIC EJ1155920: The Effects Of Test Method On L2 Reading And Listening Performance

By

This paper examines how different test methods may tap different aspects of second language knowledge. It employs multiple-choice (MC) and constructed response (CR) items which yield distinct or convergent information in the computer delivered testing of English in its presentation of this factor. In order to examine the effects of test method, a CFA approach to a multitrait-multimethod design was adopted to examine the convergent as well as discriminant validity of the two skill area traits and the two test methods. After comparing the hypothesized model with a nested series of more restrictive models using X[superscript 2] difference tests (Byrne, 2006; Widaman, 1985), based on the information from the path coefficients, and also using principal factor analyses, it was found that: 1) the skills are factorially separable, yet, highly correlated, 2) MC and CR methods are separable, and very weakly correlated, 3) there is thus a method effect, and 4) the MC method may not be suitable in sampling the unique ability characteristics of reading and listening skills.

“ERIC EJ1155920: The Effects Of Test Method On L2 Reading And Listening Performance” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC EJ1155920: The Effects Of Test Method On L2 Reading And Listening Performance
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC EJ1155920: The Effects Of Test Method On L2 Reading And Listening Performance” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 7.31 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 71 times, the file-s went public at Sun Oct 21 2018.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC EJ1155920: The Effects Of Test Method On L2 Reading And Listening Performance at online marketplaces:


13ERIC EJ1158593: The Impact Of Conversations On Fourth Grade Reading Performance--What NAEP Data Explorer Tells?

By

This study presented a secondary analysis of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) dataset. The paper explored the differences between fourth grade reading scores by examining (1) how often the fourth graders discuss their school work at home with family and (2) how often the fourth graders discuss what they were reading with friends. The results by NAEP Data Explorer indicate that the average scale score (M = 214, SD = 36) of students who report "never or hardly ever" talking about studies at home was significantly (p

“ERIC EJ1158593: The Impact Of Conversations On Fourth Grade Reading Performance--What NAEP Data Explorer Tells?” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC EJ1158593: The Impact Of Conversations On Fourth Grade Reading Performance--What NAEP Data Explorer Tells?
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC EJ1158593: The Impact Of Conversations On Fourth Grade Reading Performance--What NAEP Data Explorer Tells?” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 10.56 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 54 times, the file-s went public at Sun Oct 21 2018.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC EJ1158593: The Impact Of Conversations On Fourth Grade Reading Performance--What NAEP Data Explorer Tells? at online marketplaces:


14ERIC ED501061: Increasing Reading/Literacy Performance Of At-Risk Elementary Students Through Increased Access To Fiction/Non-Fiction Resources And Incorporating Readers Theater Activities

By

This action research project was developed in order to increase student literacy, particularly in the area of reading, for students who were considered at-risk. The targeted student population was 2nd grade students who were served within a primary cross-categorical special education program. The classroom was housed in an elementary (K-2) school, located in a small Midwest community. The literature showed many reasons for low literacy development, including lack of reading opportunities at home, lack of background knowledge, and lack of exposure to both fiction and non-fiction resources. The initial analysis of data was determined by looking at the results of DIBELS scores. In phoneme segmentation fluency, one-third of the second-grade students fell below the fall first-grade benchmark. Star Reading scores results showed that all of the second grade students measured ranged in performance from one to one and one-half years behind grade level. The review of literature showed a number of suggestions for improving literacy, including increased reading time, and providing more interesting reading and activities, such as Readers Theater. Also suggested was providing related fiction and non-fiction activities. The teacher researcher chose to focus on increasing fiction/non-fiction resources and using Readers Theater activities. During the 14-week research period, the teacher researcher developed the classroom library with more and often related fiction/non-fiction resources. Students were initially exposed to more visits to the school library, and then offered large selections of school library books within the classroom, as available library time decreased. Readers Theater activities were selected for use each week during the research period. Post intervention analysis of the DIBELS assessment showed increase in reading/literacy areas of phoneme segmentation, and non-sense word fluency. The Star Reading assessment showed growth in grade level performance. However, only half of the students showed growth in percentile rank. Growth or lack thereof can not easily be attributed to the interventions as there were many factors during the school day that may have impacted performance, positively or otherwise. (Contains 10 figures and 6 tables.) [Action Research Project, Field-Based Master's Program, Saint Xavier University & Pearson Achievement Solutions, Inc.]

“ERIC ED501061: Increasing Reading/Literacy Performance Of At-Risk Elementary Students Through Increased Access To Fiction/Non-Fiction Resources And Incorporating Readers Theater Activities” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED501061: Increasing Reading/Literacy Performance Of At-Risk Elementary Students Through Increased Access To Fiction/Non-Fiction Resources And Incorporating Readers Theater Activities
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED501061: Increasing Reading/Literacy Performance Of At-Risk Elementary Students Through Increased Access To Fiction/Non-Fiction Resources And Incorporating Readers Theater Activities” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 42.76 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 109 times, the file-s went public at Wed Jan 27 2016.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - JPEG Thumb - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED501061: Increasing Reading/Literacy Performance Of At-Risk Elementary Students Through Increased Access To Fiction/Non-Fiction Resources And Incorporating Readers Theater Activities at online marketplaces:


15ERIC ED313689: The Effects Of Cued Phrase Boundaries On Reading Performance: A Review.

By

As in processing oral speech, proficient reading involves "chunking" written texts into meaningful phrase units. Unlike oral speech, however, cues for segmenting the written text at the proper points are not clearly marked in the text. One method for helping readers identify and use phrase boundaries is to mark such boundaries in the text. A study reviewed research conducted over the past four decades that has attempted to facilitate subjects' reading by providing marked cues to phrase boundaries. Although as a whole the research is not conclusive as to the efficacy of phrase-cued texts in aiding comprehension, it shows promise for helping improve the reading performance of at least certain types of readers, particularly for younger, poorer, and hearing-impaired readers. Phrase-cued texts seem to be facilitative for readers who have yet to achieve maturity in syntactic sensitivity. However, a level of competency in word recognition may be necessary before phrased texts can be effective. Issues to be explored in future research include topics such as points of transfer to and maintenance of facilitation on conventional texts. (One table of data is included and 73 references are attached.) (SR)

“ERIC ED313689: The Effects Of Cued Phrase Boundaries On Reading Performance: A Review.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED313689: The Effects Of Cued Phrase Boundaries On Reading Performance: A Review.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED313689: The Effects Of Cued Phrase Boundaries On Reading Performance: A Review.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 35.87 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 297 times, the file-s went public at Sat Nov 22 2014.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED313689: The Effects Of Cued Phrase Boundaries On Reading Performance: A Review. at online marketplaces:


16ERIC ED203576: Explaining Reading Performance Of Learninq Disabled Students.

By

The explanatory observational study investigated the relationships among curriculum content, instructional activity, teachers' expectations and reading performance for 52 children in six primary grade classrooms for the learning disabled. The analysis illustrates the utility of structural modeling in clarifying the probable causal relationships among the five variables studied. The model explains over 80% of the variance in end of year reading performance and reveals the ways in which the explanatory variables influence each other. Such models which may explain student achievement are seen as necessary prerequisites to evaluating educational innovations. (Author/CL)

“ERIC ED203576: Explaining Reading Performance Of Learninq Disabled Students.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED203576: Explaining Reading Performance Of Learninq Disabled Students.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED203576: Explaining Reading Performance Of Learninq Disabled Students.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 15.70 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 104 times, the file-s went public at Wed Jan 28 2015.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED203576: Explaining Reading Performance Of Learninq Disabled Students. at online marketplaces:


17A Treasury Of Christmas Plays : One-act, Royalty-free Plays For Stage Or Microphone Performance And Round-the-table Reading

By

The explanatory observational study investigated the relationships among curriculum content, instructional activity, teachers' expectations and reading performance for 52 children in six primary grade classrooms for the learning disabled. The analysis illustrates the utility of structural modeling in clarifying the probable causal relationships among the five variables studied. The model explains over 80% of the variance in end of year reading performance and reveals the ways in which the explanatory variables influence each other. Such models which may explain student achievement are seen as necessary prerequisites to evaluating educational innovations. (Author/CL)

“A Treasury Of Christmas Plays : One-act, Royalty-free Plays For Stage Or Microphone Performance And Round-the-table Reading” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  A Treasury Of Christmas Plays : One-act, Royalty-free Plays For Stage Or Microphone Performance And Round-the-table Reading
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 568.76 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 88 times, the file-s went public at Mon Jul 26 2010.

Available formats:
ACS Encrypted PDF - Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Cloth Cover Detection Log - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Dublin Core - EPUB - Item Tile - JSON - LCP Encrypted EPUB - LCP Encrypted PDF - MARC - MARC Binary - MARC Source - METS - Metadata - Metadata Log - OCLC xISBN JSON - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Original JP2 Tar - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find A Treasury Of Christmas Plays : One-act, Royalty-free Plays For Stage Or Microphone Performance And Round-the-table Reading at online marketplaces:


18Patterns Of Perceptual Performance In Children Who Are Severely Retarded In Reading / Y Elsie Bradshaw

By

The explanatory observational study investigated the relationships among curriculum content, instructional activity, teachers' expectations and reading performance for 52 children in six primary grade classrooms for the learning disabled. The analysis illustrates the utility of structural modeling in clarifying the probable causal relationships among the five variables studied. The model explains over 80% of the variance in end of year reading performance and reveals the ways in which the explanatory variables influence each other. Such models which may explain student achievement are seen as necessary prerequisites to evaluating educational innovations. (Author/CL)

“Patterns Of Perceptual Performance In Children Who Are Severely Retarded In Reading / Y Elsie Bradshaw” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  Patterns Of Perceptual Performance In Children Who Are Severely Retarded In Reading / Y Elsie Bradshaw
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“Patterns Of Perceptual Performance In Children Who Are Severely Retarded In Reading / Y Elsie Bradshaw” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 370.05 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 129 times, the file-s went public at Thu Nov 08 2018.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Archive BitTorrent - Cloth Cover Detection Log - Contents - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Dublin Core - Item Tile - MARC - MARC Binary - MARC Source - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Original JP2 Tar - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find Patterns Of Perceptual Performance In Children Who Are Severely Retarded In Reading / Y Elsie Bradshaw at online marketplaces:


19The Vocabulary-enriched Classroom : Practices For Improving The Reading Performance Of All Students In Grades 3 And Up

By

The explanatory observational study investigated the relationships among curriculum content, instructional activity, teachers' expectations and reading performance for 52 children in six primary grade classrooms for the learning disabled. The analysis illustrates the utility of structural modeling in clarifying the probable causal relationships among the five variables studied. The model explains over 80% of the variance in end of year reading performance and reveals the ways in which the explanatory variables influence each other. Such models which may explain student achievement are seen as necessary prerequisites to evaluating educational innovations. (Author/CL)

“The Vocabulary-enriched Classroom : Practices For Improving The Reading Performance Of All Students In Grades 3 And Up” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  The Vocabulary-enriched Classroom : Practices For Improving The Reading Performance Of All Students In Grades 3 And Up
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 654.88 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 39 times, the file-s went public at Sat Aug 13 2022.

Available formats:
ACS Encrypted PDF - AVIF Thumbnails ZIP - Cloth Cover Detection Log - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Dublin Core - EPUB - Item Tile - JPEG Thumb - JSON - LCP Encrypted EPUB - LCP Encrypted PDF - Log - MARC - MARC Binary - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - PNG - Page Numbers JSON - RePublisher Final Processing Log - RePublisher Initial Processing Log - Scandata - Single Page Original JP2 Tar - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF - Title Page Detection Log - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find The Vocabulary-enriched Classroom : Practices For Improving The Reading Performance Of All Students In Grades 3 And Up at online marketplaces:


20CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00878r001300140056-7: PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT TA-3034 WITH WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION.

By

Approved For Relea 2000/09/01 : CIA-RDP81 B0087SR001300140056-7 SECRET 16 April 1959 25X1A MEMORANDUM FOR: CONTRACTING OFFICER, ]PD SUBJECT : Performance of Contract TA-3031+ with Westinghouse Electric Corporation. 1. Reference is made to your memorandum of 27 March 1959 requesting information regarding contractor performance on the subject contract. 2. Although work continued on the Terrain Clearance Radar AN/APQ-82(XY-1) at. Westinghouse through December 1958, funding under contract TA_3n3L ce work was s on ored,by the zme, The flight test program of the AN/APQ-82(XY-1) be 25X1A gan in January 1959 and is scheduled to continue for approximately ten months. The equipment has been installed in a helicopter for instrumentation testing and will later be transferred to an operational, low altitude jet aircraft. 3. Performance on all phases of work funded under TA-3034 at Westinghouse has been satisfactorily completed. The equi - merit produced (along with the necessary drawings and manuals has been accepted by M and assigned the AN/APQ-82(X'y_1) nomenclature. 25X1A 25X1A Distribution: Orig. & 1 - Addressee 1 - P-196 1 - Chrono TSS/APD-RAK: jlg (16 April 1959) SECRET Approved For Release 2000/09/01 : CIA-RDP81 B00878RO01300140056-7

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00878r001300140056-7: PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT TA-3034 WITH WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00878r001300140056-7: PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT TA-3034 WITH WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 0.64 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 14 times, the file-s went public at Mon Sep 04 2023.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00878r001300140056-7: PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT TA-3034 WITH WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION. at online marketplaces:


21Poetry Reading At The Panama Hotel : A Collection Of Performance Poetry

By

Approved For Relea 2000/09/01 : CIA-RDP81 B0087SR001300140056-7 SECRET 16 April 1959 25X1A MEMORANDUM FOR: CONTRACTING OFFICER, ]PD SUBJECT : Performance of Contract TA-3031+ with Westinghouse Electric Corporation. 1. Reference is made to your memorandum of 27 March 1959 requesting information regarding contractor performance on the subject contract. 2. Although work continued on the Terrain Clearance Radar AN/APQ-82(XY-1) at. Westinghouse through December 1958, funding under contract TA_3n3L ce work was s on ored,by the zme, The flight test program of the AN/APQ-82(XY-1) be 25X1A gan in January 1959 and is scheduled to continue for approximately ten months. The equipment has been installed in a helicopter for instrumentation testing and will later be transferred to an operational, low altitude jet aircraft. 3. Performance on all phases of work funded under TA-3034 at Westinghouse has been satisfactorily completed. The equi - merit produced (along with the necessary drawings and manuals has been accepted by M and assigned the AN/APQ-82(X'y_1) nomenclature. 25X1A 25X1A Distribution: Orig. & 1 - Addressee 1 - P-196 1 - Chrono TSS/APD-RAK: jlg (16 April 1959) SECRET Approved For Release 2000/09/01 : CIA-RDP81 B00878RO01300140056-7

“Poetry Reading At The Panama Hotel : A Collection Of Performance Poetry” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  Poetry Reading At The Panama Hotel : A Collection Of Performance Poetry
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 165.17 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 9 times, the file-s went public at Sat Nov 27 2021.

Available formats:
ACS Encrypted PDF - Cloth Cover Detection Log - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Dublin Core - Item Tile - JPEG Thumb - JSON - LCP Encrypted EPUB - LCP Encrypted PDF - Log - MARC - MARC Binary - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - PNG - Page Numbers JSON - RePublisher Initial Processing Log - Scandata - Single Page Original JP2 Tar - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF - Title Page Detection Log - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find Poetry Reading At The Panama Hotel : A Collection Of Performance Poetry at online marketplaces:


22Does The Type Of Sulcal Pattern Of The OTS Modulates The Effect Of Different Reading Interventions On Reading Performance?

By

Approved For Relea 2000/09/01 : CIA-RDP81 B0087SR001300140056-7 SECRET 16 April 1959 25X1A MEMORANDUM FOR: CONTRACTING OFFICER, ]PD SUBJECT : Performance of Contract TA-3031+ with Westinghouse Electric Corporation. 1. Reference is made to your memorandum of 27 March 1959 requesting information regarding contractor performance on the subject contract. 2. Although work continued on the Terrain Clearance Radar AN/APQ-82(XY-1) at. Westinghouse through December 1958, funding under contract TA_3n3L ce work was s on ored,by the zme, The flight test program of the AN/APQ-82(XY-1) be 25X1A gan in January 1959 and is scheduled to continue for approximately ten months. The equipment has been installed in a helicopter for instrumentation testing and will later be transferred to an operational, low altitude jet aircraft. 3. Performance on all phases of work funded under TA-3034 at Westinghouse has been satisfactorily completed. The equi - merit produced (along with the necessary drawings and manuals has been accepted by M and assigned the AN/APQ-82(X'y_1) nomenclature. 25X1A 25X1A Distribution: Orig. & 1 - Addressee 1 - P-196 1 - Chrono TSS/APD-RAK: jlg (16 April 1959) SECRET Approved For Release 2000/09/01 : CIA-RDP81 B00878RO01300140056-7

“Does The Type Of Sulcal Pattern Of The OTS Modulates The Effect Of Different Reading Interventions On Reading Performance?” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  Does The Type Of Sulcal Pattern Of The OTS Modulates The Effect Of Different Reading Interventions On Reading Performance?
  • Authors: ➤  

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "data" format, the size of the file-s is: 0.40 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 3 times, the file-s went public at Fri Sep 10 2021.

Available formats:
Archive BitTorrent - Metadata - ZIP -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find Does The Type Of Sulcal Pattern Of The OTS Modulates The Effect Of Different Reading Interventions On Reading Performance? at online marketplaces:


23CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp87m01152r000100040002-0: IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE FOLLOWING EMPLOYEE OF THIS AGENCY'S FEDERAL RESEARCH DIVISION, WHO IS ENGAGED IN SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR THE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, BE GRANTED (SANITIZED) CLEARANCE - WHICH IS NEEDED IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR O

By

Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/16: CIA-RDP87MO1152R000100040002-0 OLL 85-4013 1 Office of Legislative Liaison Routing Slip Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/16: CIA-RDP87MO1152R000100040002-0 ACTION INFO 1. D/OLL x 2. DD/OLL X 3. Admin Officer x 4. Liaison - 5. Legislation x X X 9. 10. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/16: CIA-RDP87M01152R000100040002-0 ('LL 85-4C:13 Office of Legislative Liaison Routh sap 5. Legislation SUSPENSE Actlon mks: Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/16: CIA-RDP87M01152R000100040002-0 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/16: CIA-RDP87MO1152R000100040002-0 3. ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP TO. (Name, office symbol, room number, Initials Date 4. L~qion File Note and Return proval For Clearance Per Conversation Requested For Correction Prepare Reply ircutate For Your Information See Me mment Investigate Signature Coordination Justify DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals, clearances, and similar actions FRAM: (Name, org. symb9l, Agency/Post) M U, 5041-102 Room No.-Bldg. i-r A- t5 Phone No. X87-S6 /9 OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76) Prescribed by GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.206 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/16: CIA-RDP87MO1152R000100040002-0 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/16: CIA-RDP87MO1152R000100040002-0 OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT LIBRARIAN FOR RESEARCH SERVICES STAT STAT STAT STAT 8s'. yo /3 U N L I L Fff C/ n t - ' ' 9 ` ?s t I ' December 31, 1985 It is requested that the following employees of this agency's Federal Research Division, who are engaged in special projects for the Defense Intelligence Agency, be granted learances - which are needed in the performance of their official duties: Additional information relating to this request, if needed, can be obtained from Personnel Security Officer, Library of Congress (tel: 287-5618/5619). Director tor. Genera a erence Research Services Director of Central Intelligence Washington, D.C. 20505 Attn: Office of Legislative Liaison FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/16: CIA-RDP87MO1152R000100040002-0 o THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Z

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp87m01152r000100040002-0: IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE FOLLOWING EMPLOYEE OF THIS AGENCY'S FEDERAL RESEARCH DIVISION, WHO IS ENGAGED IN SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR THE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, BE GRANTED (SANITIZED) CLEARANCE - WHICH IS NEEDED IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR O” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp87m01152r000100040002-0: IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE FOLLOWING EMPLOYEE OF THIS AGENCY'S FEDERAL RESEARCH DIVISION, WHO IS ENGAGED IN SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR THE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, BE GRANTED (SANITIZED) CLEARANCE - WHICH IS NEEDED IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR O
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 1.64 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 4 times, the file-s went public at Tue May 20 2025.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp87m01152r000100040002-0: IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE FOLLOWING EMPLOYEE OF THIS AGENCY'S FEDERAL RESEARCH DIVISION, WHO IS ENGAGED IN SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR THE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, BE GRANTED (SANITIZED) CLEARANCE - WHICH IS NEEDED IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR O at online marketplaces:


24CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00879r000100020010-1: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE OF MAINTENANCE

By

Approved For Release 2007/10/19: CIA-RDP81 B00879R000100020010-1 i WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION Certiflente of Performance of Maintenance I hereby cortifv tint the Weatinghouc ectric Corporatist 464 c -- a e - - o ti i. e ~. - wwa~r .. *iai.: if dig) ,p~? S$a 1' Apr 1 30 Apr The trgvei ioattd below vas perf0jj~and authorized and-fA c Rr to the Goverment. Mtthori. zed. Travel Performed MODE COST COM4TB -.._w-------------------------- N/A--w -------..------------------ NAME PERIOD OF TRAVEL From - Services performed byt Engineer gineer echnioIan Teo1=.ntai axi Approved For Release 2007/10/19: CIA-RDP81 B00879R000100020010-1

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00879r000100020010-1: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE OF MAINTENANCE” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00879r000100020010-1: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE OF MAINTENANCE
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 0.42 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 9 times, the file-s went public at Tue Feb 18 2025.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00879r000100020010-1: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE OF MAINTENANCE at online marketplaces:


25CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81-00314r000200080039-2: MINUTES OF THE IAG COMMITTEE ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

By

Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP81-003W000200080039-2 cl}'I' L(:v IH 1 1;1;;;(1M u?;I, I;~l1P,(;I:; II;jJ I' Inturdd(jency 110v isory b??oul) 1900 E S tree L , I1.0. l?/ioshingt011, U.C. 20115 Minutes of the IAG Committee On Performance Appraisal April 13, 1979 Ms. Mary Sugar, Chairperson of the Performance Appraisal Task Force, opened the meeting by saying that OPM was planning to hold a series of symposia featuring speakers on different aspects of performance appraisal. She introduced Ms. Kathleen Colbourn of the Training Leadership Division, who handed out a questionnaire asking for agency suggestions for speakers and topics. It was emphasized that the symposia should be practical rather than theoretical and should use speakers who have had operating experience. Ms. Sugar announced that a special session of the course in performance appraisal and standards setting would be held on May 4 for IAG committee members (principals and alternates). Agencies were invited to submit nomination forms marked "IAG member" through regular channels. Dr. James Caplan of OPM's internal Office of Personnel, assisted by Mr. Michael Barrett of the Compensation Group, discussed the revised production standards recently developed for OPM's retirement claims examiners. The standards, currently being validated, are designed to provide equitable treat- ment of employees through incentives for handling the more complex cases. The underlying research had indicated that units of work previously treated alike for production measurement purposes were not always truly comparable. As useful byproducts of the new standards, the assignment and orderly processing of cases are facilitated and management is provided with information on what types of cases are causing processing problems. Performance standards will be established based in part on the production standards.. Mr. Bruce Tomaso of IRS discussed the computerized rating system in use at IRS Service Centers. The system is based on peer group comparisons, floating stan- dards, and forced distributions and was designed primarily to identify the top performers for competitive promotion purposes. The system will have to be changed to meet the requirements for appraisal of current job performance in relation to established standards communicated in advance. Mr. Ken Lawrence of OPM's Workforce Effectiveness and Development Group announced that Part II of the handbook on Suggestions on Implementing Performance Appraisal Systems will soon be issued following a limited period for review and comment by selected agencies. Part II will focus on "how to do it" while Part I, issued in February, was primarily concerned with "what to do." 1 The next IAG committee meeting will be held on April 24, 1979. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP81-00314R000200080039-2 Approved FQeleas '2gb2M&12' :PCIAI DP81,003W000200080039-2 T900 E Sire e l: , Wash ing Lori, D.C. 20415 Minutes of the IAG Committee on Performance Appraisal April 24, 1979 Ms. Mary Sugar, Chairperson of the Performance Appraisal Task Force, announced that two special FPM Bulletins will soon be issued. One is a discussion of the state of the art of performance appraisal, and the other is a checklist for appraisal system statutory and reg- ulatory compliance. Copies of these bulletins will be mailed to all committee members. It was also announced that the course for IAG members previously scheduled for May 4 will be rescheduled for a later date. Mr. Bill Stacy of the Air Force Office of Civilian Personnel Operations discussed Air Force's performance appraisal research project, which began approximately two years ago. Field testing is underway, and Air Force is aiming at implementation in 1980. Ms. Sugar distributed a draft statement clarifying the options available to an agency when employee performance falls below the minimum standard for a critical element of the position. The state- ment was discussed at length among those in attendance. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP81-00314R000200080039-2

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81-00314r000200080039-2: MINUTES OF THE IAG COMMITTEE ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81-00314r000200080039-2: MINUTES OF THE IAG COMMITTEE ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 1.62 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 17 times, the file-s went public at Sat Dec 02 2023.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Image-Only PDF Metadata JSON - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81-00314r000200080039-2: MINUTES OF THE IAG COMMITTEE ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL at online marketplaces:


26ERIC ED217397: Performance Of Hispanic Students In Two National Assessments Of Reading.

By

Data generated in the 1974-75 and 1979-80 reading performance assessments conducted by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) were analyzed to determine if changes had occurred in the performance of Hispanic students. Results showed that although Hispanic students' reading performance remained below the national level, these students had made some significant gains in reading from 1974 to 1980. Moreover, the performance gains among Hispanic children at age 9, and among several groups of Hispanic students at ages 13 and 17 exceeded those of students nationally in certain areas. Specifically (1) the performance of 9-year-old Hispanos improved 5.3% compared to a 2.6% improvement for all 9-year-old students surveyed; (2) this improvement was greatest on exercises assessing literal comprehension; (3) 13-year-old Hispanos' performance stayed about the same between 1974 and 1980, but 13-year-old Hispanos in large cities improved their performance on literal comprehension exercises by 5.9 points; (4) 17-year-old Hispanos' performance also stayed about the same between assessments, with large city students again showing an improvement, primarily on exercises assessing inferential comprehension; and (5) at all three ages, Hispanos in the modal grade performed better than those below modal grade and improved their performance at a faster rate. (FL) Results (Selective) (Secondary Analysis)

“ERIC ED217397: Performance Of Hispanic Students In Two National Assessments Of Reading.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED217397: Performance Of Hispanic Students In Two National Assessments Of Reading.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED217397: Performance Of Hispanic Students In Two National Assessments Of Reading.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 15.56 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 83 times, the file-s went public at Wed Jan 21 2015.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED217397: Performance Of Hispanic Students In Two National Assessments Of Reading. at online marketplaces:


27Dreams Television Display Of Janet Kuypers Reading Poetry And Stories During The Live Performance Art Show By Janet Kuypers Live In Chicago 02/03/04

The performance art show "Dreams" was held live in Chicago 02/03/04 by Janet Kuypers, and this is a video of the television display (one of them), where the camera was fized on Janet Kuypers throughout her performance. This video shows one of the television sets, showing her perform the pieces she read, wearing different glasses even during different parts of the show. The video camera was fixed on Janet Kuypers as she read poems and stories for a live audience.

“Dreams Television Display Of Janet Kuypers Reading Poetry And Stories During The Live Performance Art Show By Janet Kuypers Live In Chicago 02/03/04” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  Dreams Television Display Of Janet Kuypers Reading Poetry And Stories During The Live Performance Art Show By Janet Kuypers Live In Chicago 02/03/04

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "movies" format, the size of the file-s is: 171.19 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 192 times, the file-s went public at Mon Mar 19 2007.

Available formats:
512Kb MPEG4 - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - Item Tile - Metadata - Ogg Video - QuickTime - Thumbnail -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find Dreams Television Display Of Janet Kuypers Reading Poetry And Stories During The Live Performance Art Show By Janet Kuypers Live In Chicago 02/03/04 at online marketplaces:


28ERIC ED434939: Impact Of The Maryland School Performance Assessment Program (MSPAP): Evidence From Classroom Instruction And Assessment Activities (Reading, Writing).

By

The extent to which the instruction, assessment, and Maryland School Performance Assessment Program (MSPAP) test preparation activities of language arts teachers aligned with the Maryland Learning Outcomes (MLOs) and the reading and writing tasks on the MSPAP was studied in the 1996-97 school year. The reading and writing activities of 280 elementary and middle school language arts teachers were collected in the fall and spring and analyzed with a coding scheme. In general, the majority of the language teachers' classroom activities reflected some of the MLOs. However, the extent to which the classroom instruction and assessment activities reflect the many characteristics of the MSPAP tasks is more limited. Slightly more than one-third of the instruction and assessment tasks were classified at one of the two highest score levels on the MSPAP scale, and 49% of the reading and 66% of the writing MSPAP test preparation activities were classified at one of the two highest levels. These results support the results from language arts questionnaires suggesting that teachers have made changes in their instruction based on the MLOs and the MSPAP. (Contains 18 tables.) (SLD)

“ERIC ED434939: Impact Of The Maryland School Performance Assessment Program (MSPAP): Evidence From Classroom Instruction And Assessment Activities (Reading, Writing).” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED434939: Impact Of The Maryland School Performance Assessment Program (MSPAP): Evidence From Classroom Instruction And Assessment Activities (Reading, Writing).
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED434939: Impact Of The Maryland School Performance Assessment Program (MSPAP): Evidence From Classroom Instruction And Assessment Activities (Reading, Writing).” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 37.91 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 80 times, the file-s went public at Thu Dec 31 2015.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - JPEG Thumb - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED434939: Impact Of The Maryland School Performance Assessment Program (MSPAP): Evidence From Classroom Instruction And Assessment Activities (Reading, Writing). at online marketplaces:


29ERIC ED598181: Advanced Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016. Research Educational Program Report The Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) Program Was Developed To Increase The Number Of Secondary Students Who Participate In Rigorous Academic Courses, To Accelerate Student Learning, And To Improve Student Performance. The AVID Program In The Houston Independent School District (HISD) Targets Students Who (1) Are In The Academic Middle And Earn Grades Of B, C, And D; (2) Desire To Go To College; (3) Are Willing To Work Hard; (4) Are Capable Of Completing Rigorous Curricula; And (5) Are Not Reaching Their Full Academic Potential. The Program's Mission Is To Close Achievement Gaps Through The Use Of Educational Strategies That Prepare All Students For Success. Key Findings Are The Following: (1) Overall, 2,061 HISD Students From 23 Campuses Were Enrolled In The 2015-2016 AVID Program, A 57.3 Percent Increase From 1,310 In 2014-2015. Student Enrollment Increased 76.7 Percent At The Middle School Level And Decreased 21.5 Percent At The High School Level; (2) Nearly One-half Of AVID Students (46.0 Percent) And Nearly One-third Of Non-AVID Students (30.6 Percent) Enrolled In Pre-Advanced Placement Courses. In Addition, 22.4 Percent Of AVID Students Versus 3.4 Percent Of Non-AVID Students Enrolled In Advanced Placement Courses And 67.1 Percent Of AVID Students Versus 1.5 Percent Of Non-AVID Students Enrolled In Dual Credit Courses; (3) From 2014-2015 To 2015-2016, The Percentage Of Students In AVID Who Took AP Exams Increased Slightly From 20.9 To 21.1, While The Percentage Who Scored Three Or Higher Decreased 5.5 Percentage Points. However, A Higher Percentage Of AVID (12.2 Percent) Than Non-AVID (8.2 Percent) Students Scored Three Or Higher On AP Exams In 2015-2016; (4) Sixth-grade AVID Students Scored Statistically Significantly Higher (17.3 Points) On The STAAR Reading Exam Than Matched Grade Six, Non-AVID Students. A Positive, Statistically Significant Effect Of The AVID Program Was Associated With An Average Gain Of 11.4 Points On This Exam; And (5) AVID Students Achieved Their Highest Pre-AP Course Grades (grades 6-12) And STAAR Reading Scores (grades 6-8) On Certified Or Highly-Certified Campuses And Performed Statistically Significantly Better Than AVID Students On Campuses With Lower AVID Certification Levels. [The Report Is Mislabeled. The Title Should Be "Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016."]

By

The Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) program was developed to increase the number of secondary students who participate in rigorous academic courses, to accelerate student learning, and to improve student performance. The AVID program in the Houston Independent School District (HISD) targets students who (1) are in the academic middle and earn grades of B, C, and D; (2) desire to go to college; (3) are willing to work hard; (4) are capable of completing rigorous curricula; and (5) are not reaching their full academic potential. The program's mission is to close achievement gaps through the use of educational strategies that prepare all students for success. Key findings are the following: (1) Overall, 2,061 HISD students from 23 campuses were enrolled in the 2015-2016 AVID program, a 57.3 percent increase from 1,310 in 2014-2015. Student enrollment increased 76.7 percent at the middle school level and decreased 21.5 percent at the high school level; (2) Nearly one-half of AVID students (46.0 percent) and nearly one-third of non-AVID students (30.6 percent) enrolled in pre-Advanced Placement courses. In addition, 22.4 percent of AVID students versus 3.4 percent of non-AVID students enrolled in Advanced Placement courses and 67.1 percent of AVID students versus 1.5 percent of non-AVID students enrolled in dual credit courses; (3) From 2014-2015 to 2015-2016, the percentage of students in AVID who took AP exams increased slightly from 20.9 to 21.1, while the percentage who scored three or higher decreased 5.5 percentage points. However, a higher percentage of AVID (12.2 percent) than non-AVID (8.2 percent) students scored three or higher on AP exams in 2015-2016; (4) Sixth-grade AVID students scored statistically significantly higher (17.3 points) on the STAAR reading exam than matched grade six, non-AVID students. A positive, statistically significant effect of the AVID program was associated with an average gain of 11.4 points on this exam; and (5) AVID students achieved their highest pre-AP course grades (grades 6-12) and STAAR reading scores (grades 6-8) on Certified or Highly-Certified campuses and performed statistically significantly better than AVID students on campuses with lower AVID certification levels. [The report is mislabeled. The title should be "Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016."]

“ERIC ED598181: Advanced Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016. Research Educational Program Report The Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) Program Was Developed To Increase The Number Of Secondary Students Who Participate In Rigorous Academic Courses, To Accelerate Student Learning, And To Improve Student Performance. The AVID Program In The Houston Independent School District (HISD) Targets Students Who (1) Are In The Academic Middle And Earn Grades Of B, C, And D; (2) Desire To Go To College; (3) Are Willing To Work Hard; (4) Are Capable Of Completing Rigorous Curricula; And (5) Are Not Reaching Their Full Academic Potential. The Program's Mission Is To Close Achievement Gaps Through The Use Of Educational Strategies That Prepare All Students For Success. Key Findings Are The Following: (1) Overall, 2,061 HISD Students From 23 Campuses Were Enrolled In The 2015-2016 AVID Program, A 57.3 Percent Increase From 1,310 In 2014-2015. Student Enrollment Increased 76.7 Percent At The Middle School Level And Decreased 21.5 Percent At The High School Level; (2) Nearly One-half Of AVID Students (46.0 Percent) And Nearly One-third Of Non-AVID Students (30.6 Percent) Enrolled In Pre-Advanced Placement Courses. In Addition, 22.4 Percent Of AVID Students Versus 3.4 Percent Of Non-AVID Students Enrolled In Advanced Placement Courses And 67.1 Percent Of AVID Students Versus 1.5 Percent Of Non-AVID Students Enrolled In Dual Credit Courses; (3) From 2014-2015 To 2015-2016, The Percentage Of Students In AVID Who Took AP Exams Increased Slightly From 20.9 To 21.1, While The Percentage Who Scored Three Or Higher Decreased 5.5 Percentage Points. However, A Higher Percentage Of AVID (12.2 Percent) Than Non-AVID (8.2 Percent) Students Scored Three Or Higher On AP Exams In 2015-2016; (4) Sixth-grade AVID Students Scored Statistically Significantly Higher (17.3 Points) On The STAAR Reading Exam Than Matched Grade Six, Non-AVID Students. A Positive, Statistically Significant Effect Of The AVID Program Was Associated With An Average Gain Of 11.4 Points On This Exam; And (5) AVID Students Achieved Their Highest Pre-AP Course Grades (grades 6-12) And STAAR Reading Scores (grades 6-8) On Certified Or Highly-Certified Campuses And Performed Statistically Significantly Better Than AVID Students On Campuses With Lower AVID Certification Levels. [The Report Is Mislabeled. The Title Should Be "Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016."]” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED598181: Advanced Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016. Research Educational Program Report The Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) Program Was Developed To Increase The Number Of Secondary Students Who Participate In Rigorous Academic Courses, To Accelerate Student Learning, And To Improve Student Performance. The AVID Program In The Houston Independent School District (HISD) Targets Students Who (1) Are In The Academic Middle And Earn Grades Of B, C, And D; (2) Desire To Go To College; (3) Are Willing To Work Hard; (4) Are Capable Of Completing Rigorous Curricula; And (5) Are Not Reaching Their Full Academic Potential. The Program's Mission Is To Close Achievement Gaps Through The Use Of Educational Strategies That Prepare All Students For Success. Key Findings Are The Following: (1) Overall, 2,061 HISD Students From 23 Campuses Were Enrolled In The 2015-2016 AVID Program, A 57.3 Percent Increase From 1,310 In 2014-2015. Student Enrollment Increased 76.7 Percent At The Middle School Level And Decreased 21.5 Percent At The High School Level; (2) Nearly One-half Of AVID Students (46.0 Percent) And Nearly One-third Of Non-AVID Students (30.6 Percent) Enrolled In Pre-Advanced Placement Courses. In Addition, 22.4 Percent Of AVID Students Versus 3.4 Percent Of Non-AVID Students Enrolled In Advanced Placement Courses And 67.1 Percent Of AVID Students Versus 1.5 Percent Of Non-AVID Students Enrolled In Dual Credit Courses; (3) From 2014-2015 To 2015-2016, The Percentage Of Students In AVID Who Took AP Exams Increased Slightly From 20.9 To 21.1, While The Percentage Who Scored Three Or Higher Decreased 5.5 Percentage Points. However, A Higher Percentage Of AVID (12.2 Percent) Than Non-AVID (8.2 Percent) Students Scored Three Or Higher On AP Exams In 2015-2016; (4) Sixth-grade AVID Students Scored Statistically Significantly Higher (17.3 Points) On The STAAR Reading Exam Than Matched Grade Six, Non-AVID Students. A Positive, Statistically Significant Effect Of The AVID Program Was Associated With An Average Gain Of 11.4 Points On This Exam; And (5) AVID Students Achieved Their Highest Pre-AP Course Grades (grades 6-12) And STAAR Reading Scores (grades 6-8) On Certified Or Highly-Certified Campuses And Performed Statistically Significantly Better Than AVID Students On Campuses With Lower AVID Certification Levels. [The Report Is Mislabeled. The Title Should Be "Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016."]
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED598181: Advanced Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016. Research Educational Program Report The Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) Program Was Developed To Increase The Number Of Secondary Students Who Participate In Rigorous Academic Courses, To Accelerate Student Learning, And To Improve Student Performance. The AVID Program In The Houston Independent School District (HISD) Targets Students Who (1) Are In The Academic Middle And Earn Grades Of B, C, And D; (2) Desire To Go To College; (3) Are Willing To Work Hard; (4) Are Capable Of Completing Rigorous Curricula; And (5) Are Not Reaching Their Full Academic Potential. The Program's Mission Is To Close Achievement Gaps Through The Use Of Educational Strategies That Prepare All Students For Success. Key Findings Are The Following: (1) Overall, 2,061 HISD Students From 23 Campuses Were Enrolled In The 2015-2016 AVID Program, A 57.3 Percent Increase From 1,310 In 2014-2015. Student Enrollment Increased 76.7 Percent At The Middle School Level And Decreased 21.5 Percent At The High School Level; (2) Nearly One-half Of AVID Students (46.0 Percent) And Nearly One-third Of Non-AVID Students (30.6 Percent) Enrolled In Pre-Advanced Placement Courses. In Addition, 22.4 Percent Of AVID Students Versus 3.4 Percent Of Non-AVID Students Enrolled In Advanced Placement Courses And 67.1 Percent Of AVID Students Versus 1.5 Percent Of Non-AVID Students Enrolled In Dual Credit Courses; (3) From 2014-2015 To 2015-2016, The Percentage Of Students In AVID Who Took AP Exams Increased Slightly From 20.9 To 21.1, While The Percentage Who Scored Three Or Higher Decreased 5.5 Percentage Points. However, A Higher Percentage Of AVID (12.2 Percent) Than Non-AVID (8.2 Percent) Students Scored Three Or Higher On AP Exams In 2015-2016; (4) Sixth-grade AVID Students Scored Statistically Significantly Higher (17.3 Points) On The STAAR Reading Exam Than Matched Grade Six, Non-AVID Students. A Positive, Statistically Significant Effect Of The AVID Program Was Associated With An Average Gain Of 11.4 Points On This Exam; And (5) AVID Students Achieved Their Highest Pre-AP Course Grades (grades 6-12) And STAAR Reading Scores (grades 6-8) On Certified Or Highly-Certified Campuses And Performed Statistically Significantly Better Than AVID Students On Campuses With Lower AVID Certification Levels. [The Report Is Mislabeled. The Title Should Be "Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016."]” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 26.35 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 77 times, the file-s went public at Mon Jul 18 2022.

Available formats:
Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED598181: Advanced Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016. Research Educational Program Report The Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) Program Was Developed To Increase The Number Of Secondary Students Who Participate In Rigorous Academic Courses, To Accelerate Student Learning, And To Improve Student Performance. The AVID Program In The Houston Independent School District (HISD) Targets Students Who (1) Are In The Academic Middle And Earn Grades Of B, C, And D; (2) Desire To Go To College; (3) Are Willing To Work Hard; (4) Are Capable Of Completing Rigorous Curricula; And (5) Are Not Reaching Their Full Academic Potential. The Program's Mission Is To Close Achievement Gaps Through The Use Of Educational Strategies That Prepare All Students For Success. Key Findings Are The Following: (1) Overall, 2,061 HISD Students From 23 Campuses Were Enrolled In The 2015-2016 AVID Program, A 57.3 Percent Increase From 1,310 In 2014-2015. Student Enrollment Increased 76.7 Percent At The Middle School Level And Decreased 21.5 Percent At The High School Level; (2) Nearly One-half Of AVID Students (46.0 Percent) And Nearly One-third Of Non-AVID Students (30.6 Percent) Enrolled In Pre-Advanced Placement Courses. In Addition, 22.4 Percent Of AVID Students Versus 3.4 Percent Of Non-AVID Students Enrolled In Advanced Placement Courses And 67.1 Percent Of AVID Students Versus 1.5 Percent Of Non-AVID Students Enrolled In Dual Credit Courses; (3) From 2014-2015 To 2015-2016, The Percentage Of Students In AVID Who Took AP Exams Increased Slightly From 20.9 To 21.1, While The Percentage Who Scored Three Or Higher Decreased 5.5 Percentage Points. However, A Higher Percentage Of AVID (12.2 Percent) Than Non-AVID (8.2 Percent) Students Scored Three Or Higher On AP Exams In 2015-2016; (4) Sixth-grade AVID Students Scored Statistically Significantly Higher (17.3 Points) On The STAAR Reading Exam Than Matched Grade Six, Non-AVID Students. A Positive, Statistically Significant Effect Of The AVID Program Was Associated With An Average Gain Of 11.4 Points On This Exam; And (5) AVID Students Achieved Their Highest Pre-AP Course Grades (grades 6-12) And STAAR Reading Scores (grades 6-8) On Certified Or Highly-Certified Campuses And Performed Statistically Significantly Better Than AVID Students On Campuses With Lower AVID Certification Levels. [The Report Is Mislabeled. The Title Should Be "Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID), 2015-2016."] at online marketplaces:


30ERIC ED197507: Relationships Among Simple Measures Of Reading And Performance On Standardized Achievement Tests.

By

Three concurrent validity studies were conducted to determine the relationship between performances on formative measures of reading and standardized achievement measures of reading. Correlational analyses for five formative measures and three standardized measures provided evidence for the validity of Words in Isolation, Words in Context, and Oral Reading as indices of reading achievement. Comparisons of performance of regular and resource program students in grades 1 through 6 revealed marked differences between the two groups and across grades. The usefulness of the formative measures for continuous evaluation of student growth in reading is discussed. (Author/CL)

“ERIC ED197507: Relationships Among Simple Measures Of Reading And Performance On Standardized Achievement Tests.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED197507: Relationships Among Simple Measures Of Reading And Performance On Standardized Achievement Tests.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED197507: Relationships Among Simple Measures Of Reading And Performance On Standardized Achievement Tests.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 58.77 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 107 times, the file-s went public at Tue Feb 10 2015.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - JPEG Thumb - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED197507: Relationships Among Simple Measures Of Reading And Performance On Standardized Achievement Tests. at online marketplaces:


31ERIC EJ1121182: A Comparison Of Subjects' Reading And Writing Performance And Preference While Using Various Portable Electronic Magnifiers

By

The ability to read print to help maintain independence and quality of life is a primary concern of people with visual impairments. One option for reading is a CCTV (closed-circuit television) or, using a more specific term, electronic magnifier. An electronic magnifier uses a camera to enlarge images onto a screen. The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of preferences, and reading and writing performance of subjects with visual impairments using different portable electronic magnifiers. Performance was measured by assessing reading rates, writing speeds, and equivalent power used. Preferences were determined by having subjects rank ease of writing tasks with portable electronic magnifi­ers. This study assesses trends and provides information that practitioners may find useful as they demonstrate and prescribe portable electronic magnifiers. Fourteen subjects were tested. Subjects had no previous portable electronic magnifier experience, but they frequently used a desktop electronic magnifier for reading and writing. All subjects were employed at one of three agencies that serve people who are visually impaired (that is, those who are blind or have low vision). Eight portable electronic magnifiers were classified into large and small categories. Subjects read text and performed three different writing tasks with all eight portable electronic magnifiers and the desktop electronic magnifier they used daily. Testing was done over two sessions; each lasted 60 to 90 minutes. Reading speed was measured using articles from a standard print-size "Time" magazine. Subjects were asked to read aloud for three minutes, and they were informed they would be timed. Subjects were asked to sign their name, fill out a check, and print a paragraph. The subjects were informed that the task of printing the paragraph would be timed. For mean reading rates, desktop electronic magnifiers were the fastest at 61.8 words per minute. Three of the large portable electronic magnifiers had faster rates than all but one of the small portable electronic magnifiers. The average of the mean reading rates of the large portable electronic magnifiers was 46.2 words per minute versus 38.1 for the small ones. The averages of the mean writing rates were similar between the two portable groups, with larger portable electronic magnifiers at 61.0 and smaller portable electronic magnifiers at 59.3. Writing rates of desktop electronic magnifiers were the fastest at 85.5.

“ERIC EJ1121182: A Comparison Of Subjects' Reading And Writing Performance And Preference While Using Various Portable Electronic Magnifiers” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC EJ1121182: A Comparison Of Subjects' Reading And Writing Performance And Preference While Using Various Portable Electronic Magnifiers
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC EJ1121182: A Comparison Of Subjects' Reading And Writing Performance And Preference While Using Various Portable Electronic Magnifiers” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 4.45 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 50 times, the file-s went public at Tue Oct 16 2018.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC EJ1121182: A Comparison Of Subjects' Reading And Writing Performance And Preference While Using Various Portable Electronic Magnifiers at online marketplaces:


32ERIC ED477934: Validity Evidence For Washington Assessment Of Student Learning (WASL) Performance Standard Cut-Scores For Reading And Mathematics.

By

This study was designed to contribute to the validity evidence for the Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL) by providing additional descriptive data about the performance standards in reading and mathematics at grades 4, 7, and 10. After the realignment of norm-referenced tests, large numbers of students taking the WASL had corresponding norm-referenced scores from the previous year. It was possible to match samples for both sets of tests. Students' performance on the norm-referenced tests consistently showed mathematics performance to be slightly higher than reading performance at all grade levels, and performance across grade levels for both reading and mathematics was quite similar. Performance on the standards-based assessments for reading and mathematics, and across grade levels, exhibited marked variations, with mathematics performance consistently lower than corresponding grade level reading performance. Coefficients suggest a moderately strong relationship between performance on the norm-referenced tests and the standards-based assessments given a year later. Equipercentile equating of the distributions from both was developed. In addition, the percentage of students meeting the performance standard was plotted as a function of progressively higher national percentile rank bands. Data and portrayals clearly indicate inconsistencies in the difficulty of performance standards across grade levels and content areas. The lack of vertical comparability for the reading standards at grades 4, 7, and 10 undermines a belief in their reasonableness. Even though they are more consistent, the overall difficulty of the mathematics standards also makes it hard to believe that they are reasonable. The difference between reading and mathematics performance at grades 4 and 10 also makes it difficult to promote these measures as fair. Some of the factors contributing to these problems are discussed. (SLD)

“ERIC ED477934: Validity Evidence For Washington Assessment Of Student Learning (WASL) Performance Standard Cut-Scores For Reading And Mathematics.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED477934: Validity Evidence For Washington Assessment Of Student Learning (WASL) Performance Standard Cut-Scores For Reading And Mathematics.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED477934: Validity Evidence For Washington Assessment Of Student Learning (WASL) Performance Standard Cut-Scores For Reading And Mathematics.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 13.75 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 101 times, the file-s went public at Wed Jan 20 2016.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - JPEG Thumb - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED477934: Validity Evidence For Washington Assessment Of Student Learning (WASL) Performance Standard Cut-Scores For Reading And Mathematics. at online marketplaces:


33ERIC ED544504: Performance Of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students In Mathematics, Science, And Reading Literacy In An International Context. First Look At PISA 2012. NCES 2014-024

By

The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is a system of international assessments that allows countries to compare outcomes of learning as students near the end of compulsory schooling. PISA core assessments measure the performance of 15-year-old students in mathematics, science, and reading literacy every 3 years. Coordinated by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA was first implemented in 2000 in 32 countries. It has since grown to 65 education systems in 2012. PISA's goal is to assess students' preparation for the challenges of life as young adults. PISA assesses the application of knowledge in mathematics, science, and reading literacy to problems within a real-life context (OECD 1999). Mathematics was the major subject area in 2012, as it was in 2003, since each subject is a major subject area once every three cycles. In 2012, mathematics, science, and reading literacy were assessed primarily through a paper-and-pencil assessment, and problem solving was administered via a computer-based assessment. In addition to these core assessments, education systems could participate in optional paper-based financial literacy and computer-based mathematics and reading assessments. The United States participated in these optional assessments. This report presents performance on PISA 2012 in mathematics, science, and reading literacy from a U.S. perspective. Results are presented for the 65 education systems, including the United States, that participated in PISA 2012 and for the three U.S. states--Connecticut, Florida, and Massachusetts--that participated as separate education systems. These three states opted to have separate samples of public-schools and students included in PISA in order to obtain state-level results. In this report, results are presented in terms of average scale scores and the percentage of 15-year-old students reaching selected proficiency levels, comparing the United States with other participating education systems. For proficiency levels, results are reported in terms of the percentage reaching level 5 or above and the percentage below level 2. Higher proficiency levels represent the knowledge, skills, and capabilities needed to perform tasks of greater complexity. At levels 5 and 6, students demonstrate higher level skills and may be referred to as "top performers" in the subject. Conversely, students performing below level 2 are below what the OECD calls "a baseline level of proficiency, at which students begin to demonstrate the literacy competencies that will enable them to participate effectively and productively in life" (OECD 2010, p. 154). This report also presents U.S. trends over time in mathematics, science, and reading literacy, and overall results for the computer-based mathematics and reading assessments. Results for the problem-solving and financial literacy assessments will be released in 2014. Appended are: (1) Methodology and Technical Notes; and (2) International and U.S. Data Collection Results. (Contains 9 tables, 3 figures, 9 footnotes, and 3 exhibits.) [This report was prepared for the National Center for Education Statistics under Contract No. ED-IES-10-C-0047 with Westat, for "PISA 2012 Data Tables, Figures, and Exhibits. NCES 2014-024" see ED544505]

“ERIC ED544504: Performance Of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students In Mathematics, Science, And Reading Literacy In An International Context. First Look At PISA 2012. NCES 2014-024” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED544504: Performance Of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students In Mathematics, Science, And Reading Literacy In An International Context. First Look At PISA 2012. NCES 2014-024
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED544504: Performance Of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students In Mathematics, Science, And Reading Literacy In An International Context. First Look At PISA 2012. NCES 2014-024” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 50.93 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 157 times, the file-s went public at Tue Mar 29 2016.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED544504: Performance Of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students In Mathematics, Science, And Reading Literacy In An International Context. First Look At PISA 2012. NCES 2014-024 at online marketplaces:


34ERIC ED136221: Reading Competency As A Predictor Of Scholastic Performance: Comparisons Between Industrialized And Third-World Nations.

By

Using data collected by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), the authors of this study examined the reading achievement of 14-year-old boys in India and England. They sought to determine the factors involved in the academic achievement of these boys in the natural sciences. Factors studied, in addition to reading achievement, were socioeconomic background, vocabulary achievement, and thinking-stage development. The similarities between the two groups were found to outweigh the differences, although the effects of parental education and father's occupational status were less important in predicting academic success for Indian students. Reading achievement in both countries was consistently the most powerful predictor of science achievement, with the exception of performance in biology, in India. The thinking-stage variable had the next most powerful net effect, yet was only marginally ahead of meaning-vocabulary influences, in terms of direct effects. (MKM)

“ERIC ED136221: Reading Competency As A Predictor Of Scholastic Performance: Comparisons Between Industrialized And Third-World Nations.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED136221: Reading Competency As A Predictor Of Scholastic Performance: Comparisons Between Industrialized And Third-World Nations.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED136221: Reading Competency As A Predictor Of Scholastic Performance: Comparisons Between Industrialized And Third-World Nations.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 47.95 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 114 times, the file-s went public at Tue Apr 28 2015.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED136221: Reading Competency As A Predictor Of Scholastic Performance: Comparisons Between Industrialized And Third-World Nations. at online marketplaces:


35ERIC ED489534: The Effects Of Technology On Reading Performance In The Middle-School Grades: A Meta-Analysis With Recommendations For Policy

By

This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of 20 research articles containing 89 effect sizes related to the use of digital tools and learning environments to enhance literacy acquisition. Results (weighted effect size of 0.489) demonstrate that technology can have a positive effect on reading comprehension, but little research has focused on the effect of technology on metacognitive, affective, and dispositional outcomes. We conclude that although there is reason to be optimistic about using technology in middle-school literacy programs, there is also reason to encourage the research community to redouble its emphasis on digital learning environments for students in this age range and to broaden the scope of the interventions and outcomes they study. [This report was produced by Learning Point Associates.]

“ERIC ED489534: The Effects Of Technology On Reading Performance In The Middle-School Grades: A Meta-Analysis With Recommendations For Policy” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED489534: The Effects Of Technology On Reading Performance In The Middle-School Grades: A Meta-Analysis With Recommendations For Policy
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED489534: The Effects Of Technology On Reading Performance In The Middle-School Grades: A Meta-Analysis With Recommendations For Policy” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 39.93 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 295 times, the file-s went public at Sun Jan 24 2016.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED489534: The Effects Of Technology On Reading Performance In The Middle-School Grades: A Meta-Analysis With Recommendations For Policy at online marketplaces:


36ERIC EJ1090878: Does Navigation Always Predict Performance? Effects Of Navigation On Digital Reading Are Moderated By Comprehension Skills

By

This study investigated interactive effects of navigation and offline comprehension skill on digital reading performance. As indicators of navigation, relevant page selection and irrelevant page selection were considered. In 533 Spanish high school students aged 11-17 positive effects of offline comprehension skill and relevant page selection on digital reading performance were found, while irrelevant page selection had a negative effect. In addition, an interaction between relevant page selection and offline comprehension skill was found. While the effect of relevant page selection was strong in good offline comprehenders, it was significantly reduced in weak offline comprehenders. The effect of offline comprehension skill was strong in students showing high rates of relevant page selection, while it was weak and insignificant in students showing low rates of relevant page selection.

“ERIC EJ1090878: Does Navigation Always Predict Performance? Effects Of Navigation On Digital Reading Are Moderated By Comprehension Skills” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC EJ1090878: Does Navigation Always Predict Performance? Effects Of Navigation On Digital Reading Are Moderated By Comprehension Skills
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC EJ1090878: Does Navigation Always Predict Performance? Effects Of Navigation On Digital Reading Are Moderated By Comprehension Skills” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 12.13 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 53 times, the file-s went public at Thu Oct 04 2018.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC EJ1090878: Does Navigation Always Predict Performance? Effects Of Navigation On Digital Reading Are Moderated By Comprehension Skills at online marketplaces:


37ERIC EJ1095593: Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, And Reading Comprehension Performance Of Saudi EFL Students

By

Metacognitive reading strategies and reading motivation play a significant role in enhancing reading comprehension. In an attempt to prove the foregoing claim in a context where there is no strong culture for reading, this study tries to find out if there is indeed a relationship between and among metacognitive reading strategies, reading motivation, and reading comprehension performance. Prior to finding out relationships, the study tried to ascertain the level of awareness and use of metacognitive reading strategies of the respondents when they read English academic texts, their level of motivation and reading interests, and their overall reading performance. Using descriptive survey and descriptive correlational methods with 60 randomly selected Saudi college-level EFL students in an all-male government-owned industrial college in Saudi Arabia, the study found out that the respondents moderately use the different metacognitive reading strategies when reading academic texts. Of the three categories of metacognitive reading strategies, the Problem-Solving Strategies (PROB) is the most frequently used. It was also revealed that the respondents have high motivation to read. They particularly prefer to read humor/comic books. On the level of reading comprehension performance, the respondents performed below average. Using t-test, the study reveals that there is no correlation between metacognitive reading strategies and reading comprehension. There is also no correlation between reading interest/motivation and reading comprehension. However, there is positive correlation between reading strategies and reading motivation. The findings of this study interestingly contradict previous findings of most studies, thus invite more thorough investigation along the same line of inquiry.

“ERIC EJ1095593: Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, And Reading Comprehension Performance Of Saudi EFL Students” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC EJ1095593: Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, And Reading Comprehension Performance Of Saudi EFL Students
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC EJ1095593: Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, And Reading Comprehension Performance Of Saudi EFL Students” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 12.31 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 145 times, the file-s went public at Fri Oct 05 2018.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC EJ1095593: Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, And Reading Comprehension Performance Of Saudi EFL Students at online marketplaces:


38ERIC ED364852: Supporting College Learners: Metacognition, Locus Of Control, Reading Comprehension And Writing Performance.

By

A study examined how metacognition and motivation related to performance among college learners seeking to improve their skills in reading and writing. Subjects, 27 female and 16 male students representing a range of ethnicities and socio-economic conditions who were enrolled in a pre-freshman summer program at a major northern university, had their metacognitive knowledge, locus of control, reading comprehension, and writing performance measured. All participants received 12 hours of direct instruction in metacognitive skill development during the six-week program. Prior to instruction, all participants completed two questionnaires (for metacognition and locus of control), the Nelson-Denny Test, a cloze task, and a writing sample. After instruction, subjects completed all the measures again. Results indicated that: (1) subjects gained metacognitive knowledge of reading but not of writing; (2) reading comprehension and writing performance scores improved significantly; (3) gains in metacognitive knowledge and reading comprehension showed no statistically significant association; and (4) locus of control scores remained stable. Findings suggest that college learners can improve their metacognitive skill development through training. (Contains 13 references.) (RS)

“ERIC ED364852: Supporting College Learners: Metacognition, Locus Of Control, Reading Comprehension And Writing Performance.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED364852: Supporting College Learners: Metacognition, Locus Of Control, Reading Comprehension And Writing Performance.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED364852: Supporting College Learners: Metacognition, Locus Of Control, Reading Comprehension And Writing Performance.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 11.75 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 78 times, the file-s went public at Wed Oct 22 2014.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - JPEG Thumb - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED364852: Supporting College Learners: Metacognition, Locus Of Control, Reading Comprehension And Writing Performance. at online marketplaces:


39ERIC ED493067: The Role Of Demographic Factors In Predicting Student Performance On A State Reading Test

By

Background: The Hawaii Department of Education (HDOE) launched its Hawaii State Assessment (HSA) in spring, 2002, within the context of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Act of 2001 and its mandates to close the "achievement gaps" between subgroups of students. Thus, it is important to investigate the extent to which student performance on the 2002 HSA was determined by economic disadvantage and minority status to provide a clear baseline to judge progress in Hawaii's public schools to ensure educational equity. Purpose: The present study addresses three specific research questions: (1) To what extent is HSA reading performance influenced by gender, poverty or ethnicity separately? (2) Is there a general pattern of the effects due to the three demographic variables across the grade levels? (3) How accurate are the predictive models with respect to different racial/ethnic subgroups? Study Sample: The data set includes 9,257 third graders (75.35% of all third graders who took the HSA), 9,602 fifth graders (77.01%), 8,043 eighth graders (75.73%), and 6,504 tenth graders (71.72%). Findings: Girls have significantly lower failure rates than boys. Students eligible for free or reduced price lunch have significantly higher failure rates than their ineligible peers. East Asian and White have quite similar failure rates, which are clearly lower than those of the Filipino and Hawaiian groups. A general logistic model consisting of three main effects can correctly classify about 65% of the students in each grade and maintain a fairly consistent pattern of significant effects due to gender, low-income status and ethnicity. The racial/ethnic distribution of incorrect predictions of the model (false negatives and false positives) deviates drastically from the expected proportions at each grade level. Conclusion: This research provides a preliminary understanding of what roles gender, low-income status, and race/ethnicity, played, individual jointly, in determining students' reading performance in the NCLB baseline year of 2002. The research also reveals the hitherto undocumented success story that many educationally disadvantaged Filipino and Hawaiian students, with support from Hawaii's public education system, have proved to be capable of overcoming their odds of failure and reaching the HSA proficiency level. (Contains 4 tables.)

“ERIC ED493067: The Role Of Demographic Factors In Predicting Student Performance On A State Reading Test” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED493067: The Role Of Demographic Factors In Predicting Student Performance On A State Reading Test
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED493067: The Role Of Demographic Factors In Predicting Student Performance On A State Reading Test” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 7.88 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 71 times, the file-s went public at Sun Jan 24 2016.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED493067: The Role Of Demographic Factors In Predicting Student Performance On A State Reading Test at online marketplaces:


40ERIC ED661764: Examining Individual Differences In PIAAC Literacy Performance: Reading Components And Demographic Characteristics Of Low-Skilled Adults From The U.S. Prison And Household Samples. Commissioned Paper

By

In the most recent assessment by the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), approximately 19% of adults in the United States scored at or below Level 1 in literacy (National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], 2019a). Adults who performed at Level 1 were only able to identify one key piece of information from short real-world texts, and adults who scored below Level 1 struggled with this basic task. Because the PIAAC is based on a nationally representative sample, this grim finding suggests that almost one in five adults have difficulty understanding everyday texts, which include key documents like workplace memos, medical forms, and notices from children's schools. Thus, these adults' low reading skills impede their functionality in today's information-driven society. In addition to gathering data on the U.S. household population, the PIAAC Survey of Incarcerated Adults was conducted during the 2014 National Supplement phase of data collection to provide information on this particularly vulnerable segment of adults (Rampey et al., 2016). The purpose of the present study was to examine potential differences between low-skilled incarcerated adults and their counterparts in the general U.S. household sample who completed the Reading Components Supplement based on individual characteristics reported by PIAAC test-takers on the background questionnaire. Thus, the primary research questions were: Are demographic characteristics (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, self-reported learning disability (LD) status, native language status, overall health, and parental education levels) related to the literacy performance of low-skilled adults (U.S. household and prison sample)? Do the relationships of demographics to literacy performance vary based on sample type (U.S. household vs. prison sample)? Given the exploratory and novel nature of directly comparing these two samples, the study did not make specific hypotheses about each demographic category in relation to literacy performance, but instead selected these demographics based on the heterogeneity of the samples included.

“ERIC ED661764: Examining Individual Differences In PIAAC Literacy Performance: Reading Components And Demographic Characteristics Of Low-Skilled Adults From The U.S. Prison And Household Samples. Commissioned Paper” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  ERIC ED661764: Examining Individual Differences In PIAAC Literacy Performance: Reading Components And Demographic Characteristics Of Low-Skilled Adults From The U.S. Prison And Household Samples. Commissioned Paper
  • Author:
  • Language: English

“ERIC ED661764: Examining Individual Differences In PIAAC Literacy Performance: Reading Components And Demographic Characteristics Of Low-Skilled Adults From The U.S. Prison And Household Samples. Commissioned Paper” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 24.11 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 10 times, the file-s went public at Sun Jan 26 2025.

Available formats:
Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find ERIC ED661764: Examining Individual Differences In PIAAC Literacy Performance: Reading Components And Demographic Characteristics Of Low-Skilled Adults From The U.S. Prison And Household Samples. Commissioned Paper at online marketplaces:


41CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp76b00734r000200340002-1: 'FEEDBACK' AS A MECHANISM FOR THE EVALUATION OF AGENCY PERFORMANCE

By

No Description

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp76b00734r000200340002-1: 'FEEDBACK' AS A MECHANISM FOR THE EVALUATION OF AGENCY PERFORMANCE” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp76b00734r000200340002-1: 'FEEDBACK' AS A MECHANISM FOR THE EVALUATION OF AGENCY PERFORMANCE
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 2.57 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 15 times, the file-s went public at Tue Jan 02 2024.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Image-Only PDF Metadata JSON - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp76b00734r000200340002-1: 'FEEDBACK' AS A MECHANISM FOR THE EVALUATION OF AGENCY PERFORMANCE at online marketplaces:


42CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp79b00314a000600050006-5: SUGGESTION AND INVENTION AWARDS PROGRAM COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE RECORD FOR DIRECTORATE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 1 JULY 1967 - 13 DECEMBER 1967

By

Approved For Release 2004/02/12 : CIA-RDP79B00314A000600050006-5 Approved For Release 2004/02/12 : CIA-RDP79B00314A000600050006-5 O/DDS&T OEL ORD OCS OSI FMSAC 0SP Approved For RWse 2004/02/12 : CIA-RDP79B003140600050006-5 1 July 1967 - 13 December 1967 Eligible Suggestions Certificates Cash Amount Suggestions Adopted Awarded Awards Paid - Certificate of Appreciation - Certificate of Appreciation - Certificate of Appreciation $50 Award GROUP 1 Excluded from autoin.allc Approved For Release 2004/ -R P3 ?,@Cf q'A 00600050006-5 SUGGESTION AND INVENTION AWARDS PROGRAM COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE RECORD for Directorate of Science and Technology $50.00 $50.00 Approved For ReII& 2004/0 L IW-RDP79B00314AOIP00050006-5 SUGGESTION AND INVENTION AWARDS PROGRAM CCHPARATIVE PERFORMANCE RECORD Fiscal Year 1967 Eligible Suggestions Certificates Cash mount Component Suggestions Adopted Awarded Awards Paid Office of the Director Ex. Dir.-Comptroller 8 ONE 1. 2 1 TOTAL 9 2 1 ort Su Services ODDS 0MS OC 0 3 3 23 9 7 1 OF 11 1 OL 33 15 OP 14 1 OS 11 5 USSP 4 2 oTR 6 1 TOTAL 105 35 25X1 Clandestine Services 2 STAT Directorate O/DDI OCR OBI oCI ORR NPIC TOTAL Directorate O/DDS&T OEL ORD OSA OCS OSI FMSAC 00-P TOTAL 3314' --I 96 1i. *Denotes Interdepartmental Referral Suggestions. 8 1 1 15 1 5 1 1 33 15.00 $ 1,200.00 70.00 30.00 2,860.00 50.00 1,255.00 25.00 15.00 5,505.00 270.00 80.00 1 25.00 1 15.00 21 Gs ) 11 235.00 30 25.00 25X 1 $ 50.00 1 2,000.00 1 5, 000.00 1 2,200.00 1 25.00 5 ( ~~ .o) 9,275.00 1 25.00 7 89 '-8,780.00 **Plus 95 ineligible suggestions processed and closed by the Executive Secretary for a GRAND TOTAL of 1+26 suggestions received.. 4 2 - 2 140.00 15 1 - 1 150.00 7 2 - 2 500.00 7 5 - . - - - 21 6 - 6 $ 6oo.oo 2 4 - 4 115.00 7 1 - 1 814o.oo 6 2 - 2 75.00 7 1 - 1 15.00 87 19 - 19 2,335.00 of Intelligence 1 4 2 1 5 1 499 Z3o~ 21 80 31 of Science and Technology 1 1 2 1 3 1 13 1 3 2 6 2 3 5 36 pa_-) ~ S SE. C T Approved For Release 2004/02/12 : Cl -~e~ truRoq-l A000600050006-5 downgrading and A,~F,d rt n1Ylf'n Approved For Re?e 2004/0 g ?VIt1-RDP79BOO314A 00050006-5 FY 1964 293 FY 1965 3 62 FY 1966 298 FY 1967 331 Total 1,284 CIA-RDP79B00314A000600050006-5 Approved For Release 2004 WHET Approved For RelIlW 2004 M~ IA-RDP79B00314A0*00050006-5 FY 1967 PERFORMANCE 25X1 OEL - Certificate of Appreciation - $50 Award $2,200 Award $25.00 Award Certificate of Appreciation Approved For Release 2004/02/11E( I P79B00314A000600050006-5

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp79b00314a000600050006-5: SUGGESTION AND INVENTION AWARDS PROGRAM COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE RECORD FOR DIRECTORATE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 1 JULY 1967 - 13 DECEMBER 1967” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp79b00314a000600050006-5: SUGGESTION AND INVENTION AWARDS PROGRAM COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE RECORD FOR DIRECTORATE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 1 JULY 1967 - 13 DECEMBER 1967
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 1.90 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 21 times, the file-s went public at Mon Feb 26 2024.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Image-Only PDF Metadata JSON - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp79b00314a000600050006-5: SUGGESTION AND INVENTION AWARDS PROGRAM COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE RECORD FOR DIRECTORATE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 1 JULY 1967 - 13 DECEMBER 1967 at online marketplaces:


43CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80b01495r000900010004-1: 'FEEDBACK' AS A MECHANISM FOR THE EVALUATION OF AGENCY PERFORMANCE

By

No Description

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80b01495r000900010004-1: 'FEEDBACK' AS A MECHANISM FOR THE EVALUATION OF AGENCY PERFORMANCE” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80b01495r000900010004-1: 'FEEDBACK' AS A MECHANISM FOR THE EVALUATION OF AGENCY PERFORMANCE
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 2.75 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 6 times, the file-s went public at Sat Oct 05 2024.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp80b01495r000900010004-1: 'FEEDBACK' AS A MECHANISM FOR THE EVALUATION OF AGENCY PERFORMANCE at online marketplaces:


44CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81m00980r000100080016-6: EVALUATION OF EEO PERFORMANCE

By

No Description

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81m00980r000100080016-6: EVALUATION OF EEO PERFORMANCE” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81m00980r000100080016-6: EVALUATION OF EEO PERFORMANCE
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 3.07 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 13 times, the file-s went public at Fri Apr 19 2024.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Image-Only PDF Metadata JSON - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81m00980r000100080016-6: EVALUATION OF EEO PERFORMANCE at online marketplaces:


45CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp89-00724r000700260001-8: PROPOSED REVISIONS OF (SANITIZED), PERFORMANCE, DRAFTS B (JOBS #603 AND #567)

By

Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/12 : CIA-RDP89-00724R000700260001-8 '1tRANSINITTAL SLIP ' TO: Director of ' FROM ROOM NO. 11051 o wn 0 pjldff E)(TNSION lExED. -I (a) i FEB NO .24 i WREPLAHICHCESMAYFORMW Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/12 : CIA-RDP89-00724R000700260001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/12 : CIA-RDP89-00724R000700260001-8 C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director Deputy Director for Intelligence Deputy Director for Operations Deputy Director for Science and Technology General Counsel Inspector General Comptroller Chief, Regulatory Policy Division SUBJECT: Proposed Revisions of Performance, Drafts B (Jobs #603 and #567) 1. The attached proposals were initiated by the Office of Finance and approved by the members of the Travel Polic Committee. The initial drafts were revalidations of and provided a current synopsis for each regulation. As a result of coordinator comments, these Drafts B are revisions of the proposals and represent the final versions. The significant changes in each regulation, indicated by brackets, are as follows: 2. We plan to send these proposals to the Deputy Director for Administration and Deputy Director for Operations for approval on 2 January 1984. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned before that date. Attachments: A. Concurrence Sheets (OGC B. Proposed Revision of C. Proposed Revision of cc: AO/DCI OL SSA/DDA OMS OF OP OC OS ODP OTE UNCLASSIFIED WHEN SEPARATED FROM ATTACHMENTS 6iy 41 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/12: CIA-RDP89-00724R000700260001-8 2 - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/12 : CIA-RDP89-00724R000700260001-8 ALAvU1V131 KR11 VL - 11141LKIVHL UJL UINLI HQ. INSTRUCTION SHEET SSS. NOS. . AOS NOS. 13&14 2/26/80 SSG. NOS. ? AOS NOS. 1&2 is revised to provide current standards for scheduling and routing travel by direct route and policy regarding travel by indirect route. Page numbers of the regulation have been changed as part of a new procedure. All headquarters regulations will be changed to start with page one. A new Table of Contents will be issued when all regulations have been changed. Arrows in the page margin show the locations of the changes described above. DISTRIBUTION: AB ALMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/12 : CIA-RDP89-00724R000700260001-8 STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/12 : CIA-RDP89-00724R000700260001-8 Next 5 Page(s) In Document Denied Iq Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/12 : CIA-RDP89-00724R000700260001-8

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp89-00724r000700260001-8: PROPOSED REVISIONS OF (SANITIZED), PERFORMANCE, DRAFTS B (JOBS #603 AND #567)” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp89-00724r000700260001-8: PROPOSED REVISIONS OF (SANITIZED), PERFORMANCE, DRAFTS B (JOBS #603 AND #567)
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 1.55 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 4 times, the file-s went public at Mon Jun 09 2025.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp89-00724r000700260001-8: PROPOSED REVISIONS OF (SANITIZED), PERFORMANCE, DRAFTS B (JOBS #603 AND #567) at online marketplaces:


46CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp88-01314r000100120005-7: [CHARGES THAT CIA 'SLANTED' PERFORMANCE FIGURES ON SOVIET BACKIRE BOMBER TO SUIT POLICIES OF HENRY KISSINGER]

By

Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA- - CIA OPERATIONS CENTER NEWS SERVICE DISTRIBUTION II Date. Item No. -----_-- Ref. No. ---- Approved For Release 2005/01/11: CIA-RDP88-01314R000100120005-7

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp88-01314r000100120005-7: [CHARGES THAT CIA 'SLANTED' PERFORMANCE FIGURES ON SOVIET BACKIRE BOMBER TO SUIT POLICIES OF HENRY KISSINGER]” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp88-01314r000100120005-7: [CHARGES THAT CIA 'SLANTED' PERFORMANCE FIGURES ON SOVIET BACKIRE BOMBER TO SUIT POLICIES OF HENRY KISSINGER]
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 0.56 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 13 times, the file-s went public at Sun Mar 31 2024.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Image-Only PDF Metadata JSON - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp88-01314r000100120005-7: [CHARGES THAT CIA 'SLANTED' PERFORMANCE FIGURES ON SOVIET BACKIRE BOMBER TO SUIT POLICIES OF HENRY KISSINGER] at online marketplaces:


47CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00879r000100020028-2: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE OF MAINTENANCE

By

Approved For Release 2007/10/19: CIA-RDP81 B00879R000100020028-2 Nft#l Weatinghouae Electric Corporation has I hereby certify that the 25X1 ,-L.bjii .ctoriiv performed the rvice called for under Contract for the period 1 Sept. 60 through0 Sept. 60 The travel indicated below vae performed and authorized and is ebargeable >o the Government .titt orized Travel Perforne To MODE C:1J6T? COP IENTS 2 Sept - 9 Sept Balt., Md. - Auto Del Rio, Texas Services performed by: , Engineer Engineer Technician Technician was on official leave from 1Sept to 2 Sept 60inclusive. Approved For Release 2007/10/19: CIA-RDP81 B00879R000100020028-2

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00879r000100020028-2: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE OF MAINTENANCE” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00879r000100020028-2: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE OF MAINTENANCE
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 0.59 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 5 times, the file-s went public at Tue Feb 18 2025.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp81b00879r000100020028-2: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE OF MAINTENANCE at online marketplaces:


48CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp85-00988r000400150003-0: A BILL TO AMEND THE COPYRIGHT LAW, TITLE 17 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE. TO CREATE PUBLIC PERFORMANCE RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO SOUND RECORDINGS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

By

No Description

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp85-00988r000400150003-0: A BILL TO AMEND THE COPYRIGHT LAW, TITLE 17 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE. TO CREATE PUBLIC PERFORMANCE RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO SOUND RECORDINGS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp85-00988r000400150003-0: A BILL TO AMEND THE COPYRIGHT LAW, TITLE 17 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE. TO CREATE PUBLIC PERFORMANCE RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO SOUND RECORDINGS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 13.80 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 20 times, the file-s went public at Tue Feb 27 2024.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Image-Only PDF Metadata JSON - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp85-00988r000400150003-0: A BILL TO AMEND THE COPYRIGHT LAW, TITLE 17 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE. TO CREATE PUBLIC PERFORMANCE RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO SOUND RECORDINGS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. at online marketplaces:


49CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp96r01136r002605130005-8: AIR FORCE COLONEL DIES 'IN PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES'

By

Approved For Release 2010/10/29: CIA-RDP96R01136R002605130005-8 III. 16 Mar 84 V 2 USSR NATIONAL AFFAIRS MILITARY DEVELOPMENTS "Proceeding from the insistent need not to lose time, to prevent the spread of the. arms race to outer space, the USSR suggests to reach agreement on banning the use of force in outer space and from space with regard to earth." Pointing out that the Soviet proposals met with broad response and support at the session of the United Nations General Assembly, Pavel Kutakhov stressed that "near- earth space has become an important section of human activity. Peaceful exploration of outer space must yield for mankind many things that will beautify its life, fill it with new contents." [In a similar report beoadcast on 9 Mar at 1600 GMT, Moscow said the meeting was attended by G.V. Romanov, member of the Politburo and secretary of the CPSU Central Committee; and L.V. Smirnov, deputy chairman of the USSR Council of Ministers, among others.] AIR FORCE COLONEL DIES 'IN PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES' PM141511 Moscow KRASNAYA ZVEZDA in Russian 13 Mar 84 econd Edition p 4 [Unattributed announcement] [Text] The Command and Political Department of the Air Force commander in chief's Main Staff and Directorates, and his combat friends and comrade report with profound sorrow the d~e,ath in the pew rformance of his service dnfiiPS of Colonel Aleksandr Aleksandrovich K[~rachkni~, member of the CPSU since 1960 and USSR honored mi nary airman, and express their condolences to the deceased's relatives and friends. ~s~~ ~', P~~ Approved For Release 2010/10/29: CIA-RDP96R01136R002605130005-8

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp96r01136r002605130005-8: AIR FORCE COLONEL DIES 'IN PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES'” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp96r01136r002605130005-8: AIR FORCE COLONEL DIES 'IN PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES'
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 0.70 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 10 times, the file-s went public at Sun May 25 2025.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp96r01136r002605130005-8: AIR FORCE COLONEL DIES 'IN PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES' at online marketplaces:


50CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp78b04770a000700040116-4: INFORMAL PROGRESS REPORT ON 'STUDY OF P.I. PERFORMANCE'

By

No Description

“CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp78b04770a000700040116-4: INFORMAL PROGRESS REPORT ON 'STUDY OF P.I. PERFORMANCE'” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp78b04770a000700040116-4: INFORMAL PROGRESS REPORT ON 'STUDY OF P.I. PERFORMANCE'
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 2.62 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 11 times, the file-s went public at Mon Mar 11 2024.

Available formats:
Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - Image-Only PDF Metadata JSON - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find CIA Reading Room Cia-rdp78b04770a000700040116-4: INFORMAL PROGRESS REPORT ON 'STUDY OF P.I. PERFORMANCE' at online marketplaces:


Buy “Performance Of Reading” online:

Shop for “Performance Of Reading” on popular online marketplaces.