Explore: Political Aspects Of Affirmative Action Programs

(2023), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling that race-based affirmative action programs in most college admissions violate

"Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research." Journal of Applied Psychology 91#5

Discrimination of excellence can be caused by different reasons, including legacy preferences, nepotism, substantive equality, affirmative action, ageism or

discrimination, is the concept that affirmative action and similar color-conscious programs for redressing racial inequality are forms of anti-white racism. The concept

achieve the goal of diversity. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023): The Court ruled that race-based affirmative action programs in college admissions

for the passage of legislation banning affirmative action in Nebraska. Three of the five states that ACRI pushed anti-affirmative action ballots in rejected

question of the legality of voluntary affirmative action programs initiated by universities remained unresolved. Proponents deemed such programs necessary

considered to be aspects of affirmative action. Affirmative action legislation has led to substantial improvements in the employment of minorities and women

change based on a variety of factors, such as social class and educational attainment. Governmental policies like affirmative action seek to mediate identity

social re-engineering and affirmative action program formulated by the National Operations Council (NOC) in the aftermath of the 13 May Incident in Malaysia