Explore: Exclusionary Rule

Discover books, insights, and more — all in one place.

Learn more about Exclusionary Rule with top reads curated from trusted sources — all in one place.

Topic Search

Search for any topic

AI-Generated Overview About “exclusionary-rule”:


Books Results

Source: The Open Library

The Open Library Search Results

Search results from The Open Library

1Provas ilícitas

By

“Provas ilícitas” Metadata:

  • Title: Provas ilícitas
  • Author:
  • Language: por
  • Number of Pages: Median: 239
  • Publisher: ➤  Editora Revista dos Tribunais - Thomson Reuters Revista dos Tribunais
  • Publish Date: ➤  
  • Publish Location: ➤  São Paulo, SP, Brasil - São Paulo, SP, Brasil

“Provas ilícitas” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Access and General Info:

  • First Year Published: 1995
  • Is Full Text Available: No
  • Is The Book Public: No
  • Access Status: No_ebook

Online Marketplaces

Find Provas ilícitas at online marketplaces:


2Onrechtmatig verkregen bewijs in civiele zaken

By

“Onrechtmatig verkregen bewijs in civiele zaken” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  Onrechtmatig verkregen bewijs in civiele zaken
  • Author:
  • Language: dut
  • Number of Pages: Median: 326
  • Publisher: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink
  • Publish Date:
  • Publish Location: Deventer

“Onrechtmatig verkregen bewijs in civiele zaken” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Access and General Info:

  • First Year Published: 1999
  • Is Full Text Available: No
  • Is The Book Public: No
  • Access Status: No_ebook

Online Marketplaces

Find Onrechtmatig verkregen bewijs in civiele zaken at online marketplaces:



Wiki

Source: Wikipedia

Wikipedia Results

Search Results from Wikipedia

Exclusionary rule

In the United States, the exclusionary rule is a legal rule, based on constitutional law, that prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of

Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

other situations. The exclusionary rule is one way the amendment is enforced. Established in Weeks v. United States (1914), this rule holds that evidence

Gender-critical feminism

Gender-critical feminism, also known as trans-exclusionary radical feminism or TERFism, is an ideology or movement that opposes what it refers to as "gender

Dollree Mapp

she thought to be a fake search warrant. Mapp also argued that the Exclusionary Rule was violated due to the collection of the evidence that was found

Search and seizure

procedures, such as with a motion to suppress the evidence under the exclusionary rule. In Italy protection from search and seizure is enshrined in Article

Good-faith exception

one of the limitations on the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment. For criminal proceedings, the exclusionary rule prohibits entry of evidence obtained

Miranda warning

suppression under the Miranda exclusionary rule. That is, if the defendant objects or files a motion to suppress, the exclusionary rule would prohibit the prosecution

Mapp v. Ohio

a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained

Wolf v. Colorado

that, while the Fourth Amendment was applicable to the states, the exclusionary rule was not a necessary ingredient of the Fourth Amendment's right against

Dallin H. Oaks

evidence exclusion and the Fourth Amendment. He was opposed to the exclusionary rule and favored prosecution in "victim-less crimes". In the summer of