Explore: Bhavaviveka

Discover books, insights, and more — all in one place.

Learn more about Bhavaviveka with top reads curated from trusted sources — all in one place.

Topic Search

Search for any topic

AI-Generated Overview About “bhavaviveka”:


Books Results

Source: The Open Library

The Open Library Search Results

Search results from The Open Library

1Dharmapalas's Yogācāra critique of Bhavāviveka's Mādhyamika

By

Book's cover

“Dharmapalas's Yogācāra critique of Bhavāviveka's Mādhyamika” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  Dharmapalas's Yogācāra critique of Bhavāviveka's Mādhyamika
  • Authors:
  • Language: English
  • Number of Pages: Median: 153
  • Publisher: Edwin Mellen Press
  • Publish Date:
  • Publish Location: Lewiston, N.Y

“Dharmapalas's Yogācāra critique of Bhavāviveka's Mādhyamika” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Access and General Info:

  • First Year Published: 1997
  • Is Full Text Available: No
  • Is The Book Public: No
  • Access Status: No_ebook

Online Access

Downloads Are Not Available:

The book is not public therefore the download links will not allow the download of the entire book, however, borrowing the book online is available.

Online Borrowing:

    Online Marketplaces

    Find Dharmapalas's Yogācāra critique of Bhavāviveka's Mādhyamika at online marketplaces:



    Wiki

    Source: Wikipedia

    Wikipedia Results

    Search Results from Wikipedia

    Bhāviveka

    Bhāviveka, also called Bhāvaviveka (traditional Chinese: 清辯; ; pinyin: Qīngbiàn; Wylie: slob dpon bha bya, skal ldan, legs ldan), and Bhavya was a sixth-century

    Buddhist logico-epistemology

    arguments for emptiness, Bhāvaviveka drew on the work of Dignāga which put forth a new way of presenting logical arguments. Bhāvaviveka was later criticized

    Madhyamaka

    debate, Bhāvaviveka criticized Buddhapālita for not putting Madhyamaka arguments into proper "autonomous syllogisms" (svatantra). Bhāvaviveka argued that

    Buddhism and Hinduism

    Press. "1959-156-1: Acarya Bhavaviveka Converts a Nonbeliever to Buddhism". Philadelphia Museum of Art: Acarya Bhavaviveka Converts a Nonbeliever to Buddhism

    Svatantrika–Prasaṅgika distinction

    proponent of the distinction, followed Candrakīrti in his rejection of Bhavaviveka's arguments. According to Tsongkhapa, the Svātantrikas do negate intrinsic

    Śūnyatā

    positive thesis. Buddhapālita is often contrasted with the works of Bhāvaviveka (c. 500 – c. 578), who argued for the use of logical arguments using

    Chandrakirti

    later Bhāvaviveka or Bhāvaviveka II (author of the Madhyamakārthasaṃgraha and the Madhyamakaratnapradīpa), not to be confused with the first Bhāvaviveka (c

    Gaudapada

    and particularly those of scholars Bhavaviveka, Santaraksita and Kamalasila who cite Gauḍapada kārikās. Bhavaviveka was a contemporary of Dharmapala, states

    Buddhist canons

    the Śariputraparipṛcchā (Taisho 1465). Various ancient sources (like Bhāvaviveka, and Paramārtha) also indicate that the different branches of the Mahāsāṃghika

    Śrīmālādevī Siṃhanāda Sūtra

    Lokakṣema Kumārajīva Asanga Vasubandhu Sthiramati Buddhapālita Dignāga Bhāvaviveka Dharmakīrti Candrakīrti Sengzhao Jizang Zhiyi Shandao Bodhidharma Huineng