Downloads & Free Reading Options - Results
No Limits To Learning by James W. Botkin
Read "No Limits To Learning" by James W. Botkin through these free online access and download options.
Books Results
Source: The Internet Archive
The internet Archive Search Results
Available books for downloads and borrow from The internet Archive
1No Limits To Learning : Bridging The Human Gap : A Report To The Club Of Rome
By Botkin, James W
“No Limits To Learning : Bridging The Human Gap : A Report To The Club Of Rome” Metadata:
- Title: ➤ No Limits To Learning : Bridging The Human Gap : A Report To The Club Of Rome
- Author: Botkin, James W
- Language: English
“No Limits To Learning : Bridging The Human Gap : A Report To The Club Of Rome” Subjects and Themes:
- Subjects: ➤ Club of Rome - Social change - Learning -- Social aspects - Social Change - Learning - Adaptation, Psychological - Changement social - Apprentissage -- Aspect social - 02.40 futurology - 81.40 educational organization on meso-level: general - Acquisition de connaissances - Lernen - Vooruitgang - Maatschappijverbetering - Leren - onderwijs - education - samenleving - society - onderwijshervorming - educational reform - onderwijsvernieuwing - educational innovation - Sociology of Education - Onderwijssociologie
Edition Identifiers:
- Internet Archive ID: nolimitstolearni0000botk
Downloads Information:
The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 407.17 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 92 times, the file-s went public at Thu Aug 06 2020.
Available formats:
ACS Encrypted EPUB - ACS Encrypted PDF - Abbyy GZ - Cloth Cover Detection Log - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Dublin Core - EPUB - Item Tile - JPEG Thumb - JSON - LCP Encrypted EPUB - LCP Encrypted PDF - Log - MARC - MARC Binary - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - PNG - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Original JP2 Tar - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF - Title Page Detection Log - chOCR - hOCR -
Related Links:
- Whefi.com: Download
- Whefi.com: Review - Coverage
- Internet Archive: Details
- Internet Archive Link: Downloads
Online Marketplaces
Find No Limits To Learning : Bridging The Human Gap : A Report To The Club Of Rome at online marketplaces:
- Amazon: Audiable, Kindle and printed editions.
- Ebay: New & used books.
2ERIC ED581257: Project Based Learning: Evaluation Report And Executive Summary Project Based Learning (PBL) Is A Pedagogical Approach That Seeks To Provide Year 7 Pupils With Independent And Group Learning Skills To Meet Both The Needs Of The Year 7 Curriculum As Well As Support Their Learning In Future Stages Of Their Education. It Particularly Aims To Improve Their Engagement In Learning As Well As Practical Literacy Skills. This Trial Evaluates A Specific Type Of PBL Known As "Learning Through REAL Projects", Developed By The Innovation Unit--an Independent Social Enterprise That Aims To Improve Public Sector Services. A Year Long Pilot Project In 2013/2014 With Eight Schools (763 Pupils) Established The Feasibility Of A Main Trial. It Provided The Opportunity To Develop The Intervention And Test The Research Procedures. The Results Contained In This Report Relate To A Randomised Controlled Trial That Took Place Between September 2014 And April 2016. Twelve Intervention Schools (2,101 Pupils) And 12 Control Schools (1,973 Pupils) Were Involved In The Trial. REAL Projects Was Delivered By Teachers, Supported In Many Instances By Teaching Assistants (TAs), With Further Support From Senior Leadership Colleagues. It Was Delivered For A Year In The Intervention Schools With A Relatively Large Proportion Of Timetabled Teaching (varying Between 20% And 50%). In Almost All Cases It Was Delivered To Mixed-ability Year 7 Classes. The Intervention Used Structured Cross-subject "REAL Projects" Planned By The Delivery Teachers Who Were Supported By Classroom Coaches From The Innovation Unit. Schools Were Also Supported By Leadership Coaches. REAL Projects Are Driven By An "essential Question" Which Has Significant Educational Content. The Projects Encouraged Pupils To Create An "excellent" Product Through Drafting And Redrafting And Then To Exhibit Their Work To An "authentic" Audience. Visits Were Made To Intervention Schools At Two Time Points And Consisted Of Lesson Observations, Interviews, And Focus Groups With School Leadership, Project Leads, Class Teachers, And Pupils. Two Case Studies Were Also Conducted In Schools That It Was Agreed Delivered The Intervention Well. Key Conclusions Are As Follows: (1) Adopting PBL Had No Clear Impact On Either Literacy (as Measured By The Progress In English Assessment) Or Student Engagement With School And Learning; (2) The Impact Evaluation Indicated That PBL May Have Had A Negative Impact On The Literacy Attainment Of Pupils Entitled To Free School Meals. However, As No Negative Impact Was Found For Low-attaining Pupils, Considerable Caution Should Be Applied To This Finding; (3) The Amount Of Data Lost From The Project (schools Dropping Out And Lost To Follow-up) Particularly From The Intervention Schools, As Well As The Adoption Of PBL Or Similar Approaches By A Number Of Control Group Schools, Further Limits The Strength Of Any Impact Finding; (4) From Our Observations And Feedback From Schools, We Found That PBL Was Considered To Be Worthwhile And May Enhance Pupils' Skills Including Oracy, Communication, Teamwork, And Self-directed Study Skills; And (5) PBL Was Generally Delivered With Fidelity But Requires Substantial Management Support And Organisational Change. The Innovation Unit Training And Support Programme For Teachers And School Leadership Was Found To Be Effective In Supporting This Intervention. Overall, The Findings Have Low Security. The Trial Was Designed As A Two-armed Randomised Controlled Trial With Schools Being Allocated To Intervention Or Control Groups. It Was Set Up As An Efficacy Trial Which Aimed To Test If The Intervention Can Succeed Under Ideal Conditions. However, 47% Of The Pupils In The Intervention And 16% In The Control Group Were Not Included In The Final Analysis. Therefore There Were Some Potentially Important Differences In Characteristics Between The Intervention And Control Groups. This Undermines The Security Of The Result. The Trial Results Did Not Find That The PBL Programme Had An Impact Either On The Pupils' Literacy Performance (as Measured By Progress In English 12 Tests), Engagement, Or Attendance. The Analysis Did Find A Statistically Significant Negative Impact On Students Eligible For Free School Meals (FSM), However No Negative Impact Was Found For Lower-attaining Pupils More Generally, Which Makes It Difficult To Hypothesise Why PBL Might Negatively Impact FSM Pupils Specifically. This Adds To The Uncertainty Of The Finding.
By ERIC
Project Based Learning (PBL) is a pedagogical approach that seeks to provide Year 7 pupils with independent and group learning skills to meet both the needs of the Year 7 curriculum as well as support their learning in future stages of their education. It particularly aims to improve their engagement in learning as well as practical literacy skills. This trial evaluates a specific type of PBL known as "Learning through REAL Projects", developed by the Innovation Unit--an independent social enterprise that aims to improve public sector services. A year long pilot project in 2013/2014 with eight schools (763 pupils) established the feasibility of a main trial. It provided the opportunity to develop the intervention and test the research procedures. The results contained in this report relate to a randomised controlled trial that took place between September 2014 and April 2016. Twelve intervention schools (2,101 pupils) and 12 control schools (1,973 pupils) were involved in the trial. REAL projects was delivered by teachers, supported in many instances by teaching assistants (TAs), with further support from senior leadership colleagues. It was delivered for a year in the intervention schools with a relatively large proportion of timetabled teaching (varying between 20% and 50%). In almost all cases it was delivered to mixed-ability Year 7 classes. The intervention used structured cross-subject "REAL Projects" planned by the delivery teachers who were supported by Classroom Coaches from the Innovation Unit. Schools were also supported by Leadership Coaches. REAL Projects are driven by an "essential question" which has significant educational content. The projects encouraged pupils to create an "excellent" product through drafting and redrafting and then to exhibit their work to an "authentic" audience. Visits were made to intervention schools at two time points and consisted of lesson observations, interviews, and focus groups with school leadership, project leads, class teachers, and pupils. Two case studies were also conducted in schools that it was agreed delivered the intervention well. Key conclusions are as follows: (1) Adopting PBL had no clear impact on either literacy (as measured by the Progress in English assessment) or student engagement with school and learning; (2) The impact evaluation indicated that PBL may have had a negative impact on the literacy attainment of pupils entitled to free school meals. However, as no negative impact was found for low-attaining pupils, considerable caution should be applied to this finding; (3) The amount of data lost from the project (schools dropping out and lost to follow-up) particularly from the intervention schools, as well as the adoption of PBL or similar approaches by a number of control group schools, further limits the strength of any impact finding; (4) From our observations and feedback from schools, we found that PBL was considered to be worthwhile and may enhance pupils' skills including oracy, communication, teamwork, and self-directed study skills; and (5) PBL was generally delivered with fidelity but requires substantial management support and organisational change. The Innovation Unit training and support programme for teachers and school leadership was found to be effective in supporting this intervention. Overall, the findings have low security. The trial was designed as a two-armed randomised controlled trial with schools being allocated to intervention or control groups. It was set up as an efficacy trial which aimed to test if the intervention can succeed under ideal conditions. However, 47% of the pupils in the intervention and 16% in the control group were not included in the final analysis. Therefore there were some potentially important differences in characteristics between the intervention and control groups. This undermines the security of the result. The trial results did not find that the PBL programme had an impact either on the pupils' literacy performance (as measured by Progress in English 12 tests), engagement, or attendance. The analysis did find a statistically significant negative impact on students eligible for free school meals (FSM), however no negative impact was found for lower-attaining pupils more generally, which makes it difficult to hypothesise why PBL might negatively impact FSM pupils specifically. This adds to the uncertainty of the finding.
“ERIC ED581257: Project Based Learning: Evaluation Report And Executive Summary Project Based Learning (PBL) Is A Pedagogical Approach That Seeks To Provide Year 7 Pupils With Independent And Group Learning Skills To Meet Both The Needs Of The Year 7 Curriculum As Well As Support Their Learning In Future Stages Of Their Education. It Particularly Aims To Improve Their Engagement In Learning As Well As Practical Literacy Skills. This Trial Evaluates A Specific Type Of PBL Known As "Learning Through REAL Projects", Developed By The Innovation Unit--an Independent Social Enterprise That Aims To Improve Public Sector Services. A Year Long Pilot Project In 2013/2014 With Eight Schools (763 Pupils) Established The Feasibility Of A Main Trial. It Provided The Opportunity To Develop The Intervention And Test The Research Procedures. The Results Contained In This Report Relate To A Randomised Controlled Trial That Took Place Between September 2014 And April 2016. Twelve Intervention Schools (2,101 Pupils) And 12 Control Schools (1,973 Pupils) Were Involved In The Trial. REAL Projects Was Delivered By Teachers, Supported In Many Instances By Teaching Assistants (TAs), With Further Support From Senior Leadership Colleagues. It Was Delivered For A Year In The Intervention Schools With A Relatively Large Proportion Of Timetabled Teaching (varying Between 20% And 50%). In Almost All Cases It Was Delivered To Mixed-ability Year 7 Classes. The Intervention Used Structured Cross-subject "REAL Projects" Planned By The Delivery Teachers Who Were Supported By Classroom Coaches From The Innovation Unit. Schools Were Also Supported By Leadership Coaches. REAL Projects Are Driven By An "essential Question" Which Has Significant Educational Content. The Projects Encouraged Pupils To Create An "excellent" Product Through Drafting And Redrafting And Then To Exhibit Their Work To An "authentic" Audience. Visits Were Made To Intervention Schools At Two Time Points And Consisted Of Lesson Observations, Interviews, And Focus Groups With School Leadership, Project Leads, Class Teachers, And Pupils. Two Case Studies Were Also Conducted In Schools That It Was Agreed Delivered The Intervention Well. Key Conclusions Are As Follows: (1) Adopting PBL Had No Clear Impact On Either Literacy (as Measured By The Progress In English Assessment) Or Student Engagement With School And Learning; (2) The Impact Evaluation Indicated That PBL May Have Had A Negative Impact On The Literacy Attainment Of Pupils Entitled To Free School Meals. However, As No Negative Impact Was Found For Low-attaining Pupils, Considerable Caution Should Be Applied To This Finding; (3) The Amount Of Data Lost From The Project (schools Dropping Out And Lost To Follow-up) Particularly From The Intervention Schools, As Well As The Adoption Of PBL Or Similar Approaches By A Number Of Control Group Schools, Further Limits The Strength Of Any Impact Finding; (4) From Our Observations And Feedback From Schools, We Found That PBL Was Considered To Be Worthwhile And May Enhance Pupils' Skills Including Oracy, Communication, Teamwork, And Self-directed Study Skills; And (5) PBL Was Generally Delivered With Fidelity But Requires Substantial Management Support And Organisational Change. The Innovation Unit Training And Support Programme For Teachers And School Leadership Was Found To Be Effective In Supporting This Intervention. Overall, The Findings Have Low Security. The Trial Was Designed As A Two-armed Randomised Controlled Trial With Schools Being Allocated To Intervention Or Control Groups. It Was Set Up As An Efficacy Trial Which Aimed To Test If The Intervention Can Succeed Under Ideal Conditions. However, 47% Of The Pupils In The Intervention And 16% In The Control Group Were Not Included In The Final Analysis. Therefore There Were Some Potentially Important Differences In Characteristics Between The Intervention And Control Groups. This Undermines The Security Of The Result. The Trial Results Did Not Find That The PBL Programme Had An Impact Either On The Pupils' Literacy Performance (as Measured By Progress In English 12 Tests), Engagement, Or Attendance. The Analysis Did Find A Statistically Significant Negative Impact On Students Eligible For Free School Meals (FSM), However No Negative Impact Was Found For Lower-attaining Pupils More Generally, Which Makes It Difficult To Hypothesise Why PBL Might Negatively Impact FSM Pupils Specifically. This Adds To The Uncertainty Of The Finding.” Metadata:
- Title: ➤ ERIC ED581257: Project Based Learning: Evaluation Report And Executive Summary Project Based Learning (PBL) Is A Pedagogical Approach That Seeks To Provide Year 7 Pupils With Independent And Group Learning Skills To Meet Both The Needs Of The Year 7 Curriculum As Well As Support Their Learning In Future Stages Of Their Education. It Particularly Aims To Improve Their Engagement In Learning As Well As Practical Literacy Skills. This Trial Evaluates A Specific Type Of PBL Known As "Learning Through REAL Projects", Developed By The Innovation Unit--an Independent Social Enterprise That Aims To Improve Public Sector Services. A Year Long Pilot Project In 2013/2014 With Eight Schools (763 Pupils) Established The Feasibility Of A Main Trial. It Provided The Opportunity To Develop The Intervention And Test The Research Procedures. The Results Contained In This Report Relate To A Randomised Controlled Trial That Took Place Between September 2014 And April 2016. Twelve Intervention Schools (2,101 Pupils) And 12 Control Schools (1,973 Pupils) Were Involved In The Trial. REAL Projects Was Delivered By Teachers, Supported In Many Instances By Teaching Assistants (TAs), With Further Support From Senior Leadership Colleagues. It Was Delivered For A Year In The Intervention Schools With A Relatively Large Proportion Of Timetabled Teaching (varying Between 20% And 50%). In Almost All Cases It Was Delivered To Mixed-ability Year 7 Classes. The Intervention Used Structured Cross-subject "REAL Projects" Planned By The Delivery Teachers Who Were Supported By Classroom Coaches From The Innovation Unit. Schools Were Also Supported By Leadership Coaches. REAL Projects Are Driven By An "essential Question" Which Has Significant Educational Content. The Projects Encouraged Pupils To Create An "excellent" Product Through Drafting And Redrafting And Then To Exhibit Their Work To An "authentic" Audience. Visits Were Made To Intervention Schools At Two Time Points And Consisted Of Lesson Observations, Interviews, And Focus Groups With School Leadership, Project Leads, Class Teachers, And Pupils. Two Case Studies Were Also Conducted In Schools That It Was Agreed Delivered The Intervention Well. Key Conclusions Are As Follows: (1) Adopting PBL Had No Clear Impact On Either Literacy (as Measured By The Progress In English Assessment) Or Student Engagement With School And Learning; (2) The Impact Evaluation Indicated That PBL May Have Had A Negative Impact On The Literacy Attainment Of Pupils Entitled To Free School Meals. However, As No Negative Impact Was Found For Low-attaining Pupils, Considerable Caution Should Be Applied To This Finding; (3) The Amount Of Data Lost From The Project (schools Dropping Out And Lost To Follow-up) Particularly From The Intervention Schools, As Well As The Adoption Of PBL Or Similar Approaches By A Number Of Control Group Schools, Further Limits The Strength Of Any Impact Finding; (4) From Our Observations And Feedback From Schools, We Found That PBL Was Considered To Be Worthwhile And May Enhance Pupils' Skills Including Oracy, Communication, Teamwork, And Self-directed Study Skills; And (5) PBL Was Generally Delivered With Fidelity But Requires Substantial Management Support And Organisational Change. The Innovation Unit Training And Support Programme For Teachers And School Leadership Was Found To Be Effective In Supporting This Intervention. Overall, The Findings Have Low Security. The Trial Was Designed As A Two-armed Randomised Controlled Trial With Schools Being Allocated To Intervention Or Control Groups. It Was Set Up As An Efficacy Trial Which Aimed To Test If The Intervention Can Succeed Under Ideal Conditions. However, 47% Of The Pupils In The Intervention And 16% In The Control Group Were Not Included In The Final Analysis. Therefore There Were Some Potentially Important Differences In Characteristics Between The Intervention And Control Groups. This Undermines The Security Of The Result. The Trial Results Did Not Find That The PBL Programme Had An Impact Either On The Pupils' Literacy Performance (as Measured By Progress In English 12 Tests), Engagement, Or Attendance. The Analysis Did Find A Statistically Significant Negative Impact On Students Eligible For Free School Meals (FSM), However No Negative Impact Was Found For Lower-attaining Pupils More Generally, Which Makes It Difficult To Hypothesise Why PBL Might Negatively Impact FSM Pupils Specifically. This Adds To The Uncertainty Of The Finding.
- Author: ERIC
- Language: English
“ERIC ED581257: Project Based Learning: Evaluation Report And Executive Summary Project Based Learning (PBL) Is A Pedagogical Approach That Seeks To Provide Year 7 Pupils With Independent And Group Learning Skills To Meet Both The Needs Of The Year 7 Curriculum As Well As Support Their Learning In Future Stages Of Their Education. It Particularly Aims To Improve Their Engagement In Learning As Well As Practical Literacy Skills. This Trial Evaluates A Specific Type Of PBL Known As "Learning Through REAL Projects", Developed By The Innovation Unit--an Independent Social Enterprise That Aims To Improve Public Sector Services. A Year Long Pilot Project In 2013/2014 With Eight Schools (763 Pupils) Established The Feasibility Of A Main Trial. It Provided The Opportunity To Develop The Intervention And Test The Research Procedures. The Results Contained In This Report Relate To A Randomised Controlled Trial That Took Place Between September 2014 And April 2016. Twelve Intervention Schools (2,101 Pupils) And 12 Control Schools (1,973 Pupils) Were Involved In The Trial. REAL Projects Was Delivered By Teachers, Supported In Many Instances By Teaching Assistants (TAs), With Further Support From Senior Leadership Colleagues. It Was Delivered For A Year In The Intervention Schools With A Relatively Large Proportion Of Timetabled Teaching (varying Between 20% And 50%). In Almost All Cases It Was Delivered To Mixed-ability Year 7 Classes. The Intervention Used Structured Cross-subject "REAL Projects" Planned By The Delivery Teachers Who Were Supported By Classroom Coaches From The Innovation Unit. Schools Were Also Supported By Leadership Coaches. REAL Projects Are Driven By An "essential Question" Which Has Significant Educational Content. The Projects Encouraged Pupils To Create An "excellent" Product Through Drafting And Redrafting And Then To Exhibit Their Work To An "authentic" Audience. Visits Were Made To Intervention Schools At Two Time Points And Consisted Of Lesson Observations, Interviews, And Focus Groups With School Leadership, Project Leads, Class Teachers, And Pupils. Two Case Studies Were Also Conducted In Schools That It Was Agreed Delivered The Intervention Well. Key Conclusions Are As Follows: (1) Adopting PBL Had No Clear Impact On Either Literacy (as Measured By The Progress In English Assessment) Or Student Engagement With School And Learning; (2) The Impact Evaluation Indicated That PBL May Have Had A Negative Impact On The Literacy Attainment Of Pupils Entitled To Free School Meals. However, As No Negative Impact Was Found For Low-attaining Pupils, Considerable Caution Should Be Applied To This Finding; (3) The Amount Of Data Lost From The Project (schools Dropping Out And Lost To Follow-up) Particularly From The Intervention Schools, As Well As The Adoption Of PBL Or Similar Approaches By A Number Of Control Group Schools, Further Limits The Strength Of Any Impact Finding; (4) From Our Observations And Feedback From Schools, We Found That PBL Was Considered To Be Worthwhile And May Enhance Pupils' Skills Including Oracy, Communication, Teamwork, And Self-directed Study Skills; And (5) PBL Was Generally Delivered With Fidelity But Requires Substantial Management Support And Organisational Change. The Innovation Unit Training And Support Programme For Teachers And School Leadership Was Found To Be Effective In Supporting This Intervention. Overall, The Findings Have Low Security. The Trial Was Designed As A Two-armed Randomised Controlled Trial With Schools Being Allocated To Intervention Or Control Groups. It Was Set Up As An Efficacy Trial Which Aimed To Test If The Intervention Can Succeed Under Ideal Conditions. However, 47% Of The Pupils In The Intervention And 16% In The Control Group Were Not Included In The Final Analysis. Therefore There Were Some Potentially Important Differences In Characteristics Between The Intervention And Control Groups. This Undermines The Security Of The Result. The Trial Results Did Not Find That The PBL Programme Had An Impact Either On The Pupils' Literacy Performance (as Measured By Progress In English 12 Tests), Engagement, Or Attendance. The Analysis Did Find A Statistically Significant Negative Impact On Students Eligible For Free School Meals (FSM), However No Negative Impact Was Found For Lower-attaining Pupils More Generally, Which Makes It Difficult To Hypothesise Why PBL Might Negatively Impact FSM Pupils Specifically. This Adds To The Uncertainty Of The Finding.” Subjects and Themes:
- Subjects: ➤ ERIC Archive - ERIC - Menzies, Victoria Hewitt, Catherine Kokotsaki, Dimitra Collyer, Clare Wiggins, Andy Active Learning - Student Projects - Questionnaires - Attitude Measures - Intervention - Correlation - Pretests Posttests - Experimental Groups - Comparative Analysis - Randomized Controlled Trials - Foreign Countries - Case Studies - Grade 6 - Control Groups - Secondary School Students - Learner Engagement - Eligibility - Teaching Assistants - Pilot Projects - Literacy - Lunch Programs - Factor Analysis - Statistical Analysis - Observation - Focus Groups - Interviews - Teacher Surveys
Edition Identifiers:
- Internet Archive ID: ERIC_ED581257
Downloads Information:
The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 66.13 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 57 times, the file-s went public at Wed Jul 27 2022.
Available formats:
Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF - chOCR - hOCR -
Related Links:
- Whefi.com: Download
- Whefi.com: Review - Coverage
- Internet Archive: Details
- Internet Archive Link: Downloads
Online Marketplaces
Find ERIC ED581257: Project Based Learning: Evaluation Report And Executive Summary Project Based Learning (PBL) Is A Pedagogical Approach That Seeks To Provide Year 7 Pupils With Independent And Group Learning Skills To Meet Both The Needs Of The Year 7 Curriculum As Well As Support Their Learning In Future Stages Of Their Education. It Particularly Aims To Improve Their Engagement In Learning As Well As Practical Literacy Skills. This Trial Evaluates A Specific Type Of PBL Known As "Learning Through REAL Projects", Developed By The Innovation Unit--an Independent Social Enterprise That Aims To Improve Public Sector Services. A Year Long Pilot Project In 2013/2014 With Eight Schools (763 Pupils) Established The Feasibility Of A Main Trial. It Provided The Opportunity To Develop The Intervention And Test The Research Procedures. The Results Contained In This Report Relate To A Randomised Controlled Trial That Took Place Between September 2014 And April 2016. Twelve Intervention Schools (2,101 Pupils) And 12 Control Schools (1,973 Pupils) Were Involved In The Trial. REAL Projects Was Delivered By Teachers, Supported In Many Instances By Teaching Assistants (TAs), With Further Support From Senior Leadership Colleagues. It Was Delivered For A Year In The Intervention Schools With A Relatively Large Proportion Of Timetabled Teaching (varying Between 20% And 50%). In Almost All Cases It Was Delivered To Mixed-ability Year 7 Classes. The Intervention Used Structured Cross-subject "REAL Projects" Planned By The Delivery Teachers Who Were Supported By Classroom Coaches From The Innovation Unit. Schools Were Also Supported By Leadership Coaches. REAL Projects Are Driven By An "essential Question" Which Has Significant Educational Content. The Projects Encouraged Pupils To Create An "excellent" Product Through Drafting And Redrafting And Then To Exhibit Their Work To An "authentic" Audience. Visits Were Made To Intervention Schools At Two Time Points And Consisted Of Lesson Observations, Interviews, And Focus Groups With School Leadership, Project Leads, Class Teachers, And Pupils. Two Case Studies Were Also Conducted In Schools That It Was Agreed Delivered The Intervention Well. Key Conclusions Are As Follows: (1) Adopting PBL Had No Clear Impact On Either Literacy (as Measured By The Progress In English Assessment) Or Student Engagement With School And Learning; (2) The Impact Evaluation Indicated That PBL May Have Had A Negative Impact On The Literacy Attainment Of Pupils Entitled To Free School Meals. However, As No Negative Impact Was Found For Low-attaining Pupils, Considerable Caution Should Be Applied To This Finding; (3) The Amount Of Data Lost From The Project (schools Dropping Out And Lost To Follow-up) Particularly From The Intervention Schools, As Well As The Adoption Of PBL Or Similar Approaches By A Number Of Control Group Schools, Further Limits The Strength Of Any Impact Finding; (4) From Our Observations And Feedback From Schools, We Found That PBL Was Considered To Be Worthwhile And May Enhance Pupils' Skills Including Oracy, Communication, Teamwork, And Self-directed Study Skills; And (5) PBL Was Generally Delivered With Fidelity But Requires Substantial Management Support And Organisational Change. The Innovation Unit Training And Support Programme For Teachers And School Leadership Was Found To Be Effective In Supporting This Intervention. Overall, The Findings Have Low Security. The Trial Was Designed As A Two-armed Randomised Controlled Trial With Schools Being Allocated To Intervention Or Control Groups. It Was Set Up As An Efficacy Trial Which Aimed To Test If The Intervention Can Succeed Under Ideal Conditions. However, 47% Of The Pupils In The Intervention And 16% In The Control Group Were Not Included In The Final Analysis. Therefore There Were Some Potentially Important Differences In Characteristics Between The Intervention And Control Groups. This Undermines The Security Of The Result. The Trial Results Did Not Find That The PBL Programme Had An Impact Either On The Pupils' Literacy Performance (as Measured By Progress In English 12 Tests), Engagement, Or Attendance. The Analysis Did Find A Statistically Significant Negative Impact On Students Eligible For Free School Meals (FSM), However No Negative Impact Was Found For Lower-attaining Pupils More Generally, Which Makes It Difficult To Hypothesise Why PBL Might Negatively Impact FSM Pupils Specifically. This Adds To The Uncertainty Of The Finding. at online marketplaces:
- Amazon: Audiable, Kindle and printed editions.
- Ebay: New & used books.
3No Limits To Learning : Bridging The Human Gap : A Report To The Club Of Rome
By Botkin, James W
Project Based Learning (PBL) is a pedagogical approach that seeks to provide Year 7 pupils with independent and group learning skills to meet both the needs of the Year 7 curriculum as well as support their learning in future stages of their education. It particularly aims to improve their engagement in learning as well as practical literacy skills. This trial evaluates a specific type of PBL known as "Learning through REAL Projects", developed by the Innovation Unit--an independent social enterprise that aims to improve public sector services. A year long pilot project in 2013/2014 with eight schools (763 pupils) established the feasibility of a main trial. It provided the opportunity to develop the intervention and test the research procedures. The results contained in this report relate to a randomised controlled trial that took place between September 2014 and April 2016. Twelve intervention schools (2,101 pupils) and 12 control schools (1,973 pupils) were involved in the trial. REAL projects was delivered by teachers, supported in many instances by teaching assistants (TAs), with further support from senior leadership colleagues. It was delivered for a year in the intervention schools with a relatively large proportion of timetabled teaching (varying between 20% and 50%). In almost all cases it was delivered to mixed-ability Year 7 classes. The intervention used structured cross-subject "REAL Projects" planned by the delivery teachers who were supported by Classroom Coaches from the Innovation Unit. Schools were also supported by Leadership Coaches. REAL Projects are driven by an "essential question" which has significant educational content. The projects encouraged pupils to create an "excellent" product through drafting and redrafting and then to exhibit their work to an "authentic" audience. Visits were made to intervention schools at two time points and consisted of lesson observations, interviews, and focus groups with school leadership, project leads, class teachers, and pupils. Two case studies were also conducted in schools that it was agreed delivered the intervention well. Key conclusions are as follows: (1) Adopting PBL had no clear impact on either literacy (as measured by the Progress in English assessment) or student engagement with school and learning; (2) The impact evaluation indicated that PBL may have had a negative impact on the literacy attainment of pupils entitled to free school meals. However, as no negative impact was found for low-attaining pupils, considerable caution should be applied to this finding; (3) The amount of data lost from the project (schools dropping out and lost to follow-up) particularly from the intervention schools, as well as the adoption of PBL or similar approaches by a number of control group schools, further limits the strength of any impact finding; (4) From our observations and feedback from schools, we found that PBL was considered to be worthwhile and may enhance pupils' skills including oracy, communication, teamwork, and self-directed study skills; and (5) PBL was generally delivered with fidelity but requires substantial management support and organisational change. The Innovation Unit training and support programme for teachers and school leadership was found to be effective in supporting this intervention. Overall, the findings have low security. The trial was designed as a two-armed randomised controlled trial with schools being allocated to intervention or control groups. It was set up as an efficacy trial which aimed to test if the intervention can succeed under ideal conditions. However, 47% of the pupils in the intervention and 16% in the control group were not included in the final analysis. Therefore there were some potentially important differences in characteristics between the intervention and control groups. This undermines the security of the result. The trial results did not find that the PBL programme had an impact either on the pupils' literacy performance (as measured by Progress in English 12 tests), engagement, or attendance. The analysis did find a statistically significant negative impact on students eligible for free school meals (FSM), however no negative impact was found for lower-attaining pupils more generally, which makes it difficult to hypothesise why PBL might negatively impact FSM pupils specifically. This adds to the uncertainty of the finding.
“No Limits To Learning : Bridging The Human Gap : A Report To The Club Of Rome” Metadata:
- Title: ➤ No Limits To Learning : Bridging The Human Gap : A Report To The Club Of Rome
- Author: Botkin, James W
- Language: English
“No Limits To Learning : Bridging The Human Gap : A Report To The Club Of Rome” Subjects and Themes:
- Subjects: ➤ Club of Rome - Social change - Learning -- Social aspects - Social Change - Learning - Adaptation, Psychological - Changement social - Apprentissage -- Aspect social - 02.40 futurology - 81.40 educational organization on meso-level: general - Acquisition de connaissances - Lernen - Vooruitgang - Maatschappijverbetering - Leren - onderwijs - education - samenleving - society - onderwijshervorming - educational reform - onderwijsvernieuwing - educational innovation - Sociology of Education - Onderwijssociologie
Edition Identifiers:
- Internet Archive ID: nolimitstolearni0000botk_d9d8
Downloads Information:
The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 403.18 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 58 times, the file-s went public at Sun Mar 14 2021.
Available formats:
ACS Encrypted PDF - Cloth Cover Detection Log - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Dublin Core - EPUB - Item Tile - JPEG Thumb - JSON - LCP Encrypted EPUB - LCP Encrypted PDF - Log - MARC - MARC Binary - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - PNG - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Original JP2 Tar - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF - Title Page Detection Log - chOCR - hOCR -
Related Links:
- Whefi.com: Download
- Whefi.com: Review - Coverage
- Internet Archive: Details
- Internet Archive Link: Downloads
Online Marketplaces
Find No Limits To Learning : Bridging The Human Gap : A Report To The Club Of Rome at online marketplaces:
- Amazon: Audiable, Kindle and printed editions.
- Ebay: New & used books.
4No Limits To Learning - Bridging The Human Gap - James W. Botkin Mahdi Elmandja Mircea Malitza
No limits to learning - Bridging the human gap A report to the Club of Rome James W. Botkin Mahdi Elmandja Mircea Malitza
“No Limits To Learning - Bridging The Human Gap - James W. Botkin Mahdi Elmandja Mircea Malitza” Metadata:
- Title: ➤ No Limits To Learning - Bridging The Human Gap - James W. Botkin Mahdi Elmandja Mircea Malitza
- Language: English
Edition Identifiers:
- Internet Archive ID: NoLimitsToLearning
Downloads Information:
The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 74.01 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 874 times, the file-s went public at Thu Feb 22 2018.
Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -
Related Links:
- Whefi.com: Download
- Whefi.com: Review - Coverage
- Internet Archive: Details
- Internet Archive Link: Downloads
Online Marketplaces
Find No Limits To Learning - Bridging The Human Gap - James W. Botkin Mahdi Elmandja Mircea Malitza at online marketplaces:
- Amazon: Audiable, Kindle and printed editions.
- Ebay: New & used books.
Buy “No Limits To Learning” online:
Shop for “No Limits To Learning” on popular online marketplaces.
- Ebay: New and used books.