"Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)" - Information and Links:

Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017) - Info and Reading Options


“Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)
  • Authors: ➤  

Edition Identifiers:

  • Internet Archive ID: osf-registrations-6wquy-v1

AI-generated Review of “Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)”:


"Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)" Description:

The Internet Archive:

Nave and colleagues (2017) presented a single experiment (n=243) finding that exogenous testosterone caused a decrease in performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) by increasing intuitive-but-incorrect responses. We report three new experiments (total n=628) that also examine the effect of exogenous testosterone on CRT performance. When pooling the data across experiments, we find (i) substantial variation in CRT performance across experiments, treatment groups, and participants and (ii) variable treatment effects of testosterone on CRT performance across experiments with any average effect being weak relative to this underlying variability – regardless of whether we considered the three new experiments or all four. Given our modeling assumptions, an average treatment effect of a 7% decrease in the odds of correctly responding to a CRT item is the value most compatible with the data from the three new experiments; however, anything from a 53% decrease to a 99% increase is also reasonably compatible. Similarly, a 27% decrease is the value most compatible with the data from all four experiments; however, anything from a 62% decrease to a 58% increase is also reasonably compatible. We explore potential explanations for the pattern of results observed across the four experiments.

Read “Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)”:

Read “Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)” by choosing from the options below.

Available Downloads for “Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)”:

"Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)" is available for download from The Internet Archive in "data" format, the size of the file-s is: 0.09 Mbs, and the file-s went public at Thu Sep 02 2021.

Legal and Safety Notes

Copyright Disclaimer and Liability Limitation:

A. Automated Content Display
The creation of this page is fully automated. All data, including text, images, and links, is displayed exactly as received from its original source, without any modification, alteration, or verification. We do not claim ownership of, nor assume any responsibility for, the accuracy or legality of this content.

B. Liability Disclaimer for External Content
The files provided below are solely the responsibility of their respective originators. We disclaim any and all liability, whether direct or indirect, for the content, accuracy, legality, or any other aspect of these files. By using this website, you acknowledge that we have no control over, nor endorse, the content hosted by external sources.

C. Inquiries and Disputes
For any inquiries, concerns, or issues related to the content displayed, including potential copyright claims, please contact the original source or provider of the files directly. We are not responsible for resolving any content-related disputes or claims of intellectual property infringement.

D. No Copyright Ownership
We do not claim ownership of any intellectual property contained in the files or data displayed on this website. All copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights remain the sole property of their respective owners. If you believe that content displayed on this website infringes upon your intellectual property rights, please contact the original content provider directly.

E. Fair Use Notice
Some content displayed on this website may fall under the "fair use" provisions of copyright law for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, or educational purposes. If you believe any content violates fair use guidelines, please reach out directly to the original source of the content for resolution.

Virus Scanning for Your Peace of Mind:

The files provided below have already been scanned for viruses by their original source. However, if you’d like to double-check before downloading, you can easily scan them yourself using the following steps:

How to scan a direct download link for viruses:

  • 1- Copy the direct link to the file you want to download (don’t open it yet).
    • (a free online tool) and paste the direct link into the provided field to start the scan.
  • 2- Visit VirusTotal (a free online tool) and paste the direct link into the provided field to start the scan.
  • 3- VirusTotal will scan the file using multiple antivirus vendors to detect any potential threats.
  • 4- Once the scan confirms the file is safe, you can proceed to download it with confidence and enjoy your content.

Available Downloads

  • Source: Internet Archive
  • All Files are Available: Yes
  • Number of Files: 5
  • Number of Available Files: 5
  • Added Date: 2021-09-02 23:34:56
  • Scanner: Internet Archive Python library 1.9.9

Available Files:

1- ZIP

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: ZIP
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: bag.zip
  • Direct Link: Click here

2- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: osf-registrations-6wquy-v1_files.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

3- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: osf-registrations-6wquy-v1_meta.sqlite
  • Direct Link: Click here

4- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: osf-registrations-6wquy-v1_meta.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

5- Archive BitTorrent

  • File origin: metadata
  • File Format: Archive BitTorrent
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: osf-registrations-6wquy-v1_archive.torrent
  • Direct Link: Click here

Search for “Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)” downloads:

Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.

Find “Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)” in Libraries Near You:

Read or borrow “Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)” from your local library.

Buy “Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)” online:

Shop for “Weak And Variable Effects Of Exogenous Testosterone On Cognitive Reflection Test Performance In Three Experiments: Commentary On Nave, Nadler, Zava, And Camerer (2017)” on popular online marketplaces.


Related Books