Transfusion Requirements In Septic Shock (TRISS) Trial - Comparing The Effects And Safety Of Liberal Versus Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion In Septic Shock Patients In The ICU: Protocol For A Randomised Controlled Trial. - Info and Reading Options

The Internet Archive:

This article is from <a href="//archive.org/search.php?query=journaltitle%3A%28Trials%29" rel="nofollow">Trials</a>, <a href="//archive.org/search.php?query=journaltitle%3A%28Trials%29%20AND%20volume%3A%2814%29" rel="nofollow">volume 14</a>.<h2>Abstract</h2>Background: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is recommended in septic shock and the majority of these patients receive RBC transfusion in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, benefit and harm of RBCs have not been established in this group of high-risk patients. Methods/Design: The Transfusion Requirements in Septic Shock (TRISS) trial is a multicenter trial with assessor-blinded outcome assessment, randomising 1,000 patients with septic shock in 30 Scandinavian ICUs to receive transfusion with pre-storage leuko-depleted RBC suspended in saline-adenine-glucose and mannitol (SAGM) at haemoglobin level (Hb) of 7 g/dl or 9 g/dl, stratified by the presence of haematological malignancy and centre. The primary outcome measure is 90-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures are organ failure, ischaemic events, severe adverse reactions (SARs: anaphylactic reaction, acute haemolytic reaction and transfusion-related circulatory overload, and acute lung injury) and mortality at 28 days, 6 months and 1 year.The sample size will enable us to detect a 9% absolute difference in 90-day mortality assuming a 45% event rate with a type 1 error rate of 5% and power of 80%. An interim analysis will be performed after 500 patients, and the Data Monitoring and Safety Committee will recommend the trial be stopped if a group difference in 90-day mortality with P ≤0.001 is present at this point. Discussion: The TRISS trial may bridge the gap between clinical practice and the lack of efficacy and safety data on RBC transfusion in septic shock patients. The effect of restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion strategy on mortality, organ failure, ischaemic events and SARs will be evaluated. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01485315. Registration date 30 November 2011. First patient was randomised 3 December 2011.

Search for “Transfusion Requirements In Septic Shock (TRISS) Trial - Comparing The Effects And Safety Of Liberal Versus Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion In Septic Shock Patients In The ICU: Protocol For A Randomised Controlled Trial.” downloads:

Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.

Find “Transfusion Requirements In Septic Shock (TRISS) Trial - Comparing The Effects And Safety Of Liberal Versus Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion In Septic Shock Patients In The ICU: Protocol For A Randomised Controlled Trial.” in Libraries Near You:

Read or borrow “Transfusion Requirements In Septic Shock (TRISS) Trial - Comparing The Effects And Safety Of Liberal Versus Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion In Septic Shock Patients In The ICU: Protocol For A Randomised Controlled Trial.” from your local library.

• The WorldCat Libraries Catalog: Find a copy of “Transfusion Requirements In Septic Shock (TRISS) Trial - Comparing The Effects And Safety Of Liberal Versus Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion In Septic Shock Patients In The ICU: Protocol For A Randomised Controlled Trial.” at a library near you.