"Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction" - Information and Links:

Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction - Info and Reading Options


“Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction
  • Authors:

Edition Identifiers:

  • Internet Archive ID: osf-registrations-x3d2j-v1

AI-generated Review of “Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction”:


"Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction" Description:

The Internet Archive:

Considerable research suggests that individuals in romantic relationships tend to experience higher well-being compared to those who are single (Lucas & Dyrenforth, 2005; Luhmann et al., 2012; Purol et al. 2020; Stahnke & Cooley, 2021), often referred to as the “relationship gap” (Oh et al., 2021). This is often seen as evidence of the benefits of romantic relationships (Baumeister & Leary, 1995; Conley et al., 2013). Importantly though, the link between being in a relationship and well-being is not universally consistent, with some studies supporting this link and others not (DePaulo & Morris, 2005). But why do some studies find a relationship gap, while others do not? One potential moderating factor for the relationship gap may be the geographic region in which people live (Stahnke & Cooley, 2021). Past research has indeed shown that the link between relationship status and well-being varies significantly between nations (Lucas & Dyrenforth, 2005; Verbakel, 2012; Wadsworth, 2016). However, the reasons behind this geographic variability remain largely unclear. One potential reason driving geographic variation in the relationship gap may be differences in the prevalence of people in romantic relationships. Generally, individuals tend to experience higher well-being when their personal characteristics align with regional social norms (Diener et al., 2000; Fulmer et al., 2010, Kalmijn, 2010; Soons & Kalmij, 2009). Deviating from these norms can result in social stigma and reduced well-being (Fulmer et al., 2010; Higgins, 2000, 2005; Kristof-Brown et al., 2005). In regions with low relationship rates (i.e., where many people are not in a relationship), single individuals deviate less from the regional sociocultural norm than in regions with high relationship rates (i.e., where many people are in a relationship). As a result, the relationship gap might be more pronounced in regions with high relationship rates, but it may be less pronounced (or even absent or reversed) in regions with low relationship rates. The aim of the present research is to reveal cultural variation in the relationship gap and to test whether this variation can be explained by how common relationships are in different sociocultural contexts. Importantly, unlike previous studies that focused on cross-national comparisons, we will focus on more fine-grained regional variations within a single nation. To do so, we will use a large-scale dataset comprising a total of 588,014 participants from Great Britain. These data provide fine-grained information on participants’ place of residence (i.e., their zip-code). Using this information, we will be able to investigate whether the association between relationship status and life satisfaction varies across different regions within Great Britain. In a first step, we will test the overall relationship gap in Great Britain (i.e., whether partnered individuals report higher well-being on average). In a second step, we will then examine whether the relationship gap varies across regions in Great Britain and whether regional differences in relationship rates can account for this variation. In a third step, we will also explore other regional characteristics such as demographics, political factors, religious indicators, and urbanization (which may also entail indirect messages regarding the prevailing societal norms and beliefs) as potential explanations for cultural variation in the relationship gap.

Read “Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction”:

Read “Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction” by choosing from the options below.

Available Downloads for “Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction”:

"Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction" is available for download from The Internet Archive in "data" format, the size of the file-s is: 0.33 Mbs, and the file-s went public at Fri Jan 12 2024.

Legal and Safety Notes

Copyright Disclaimer and Liability Limitation:

A. Automated Content Display
The creation of this page is fully automated. All data, including text, images, and links, is displayed exactly as received from its original source, without any modification, alteration, or verification. We do not claim ownership of, nor assume any responsibility for, the accuracy or legality of this content.

B. Liability Disclaimer for External Content
The files provided below are solely the responsibility of their respective originators. We disclaim any and all liability, whether direct or indirect, for the content, accuracy, legality, or any other aspect of these files. By using this website, you acknowledge that we have no control over, nor endorse, the content hosted by external sources.

C. Inquiries and Disputes
For any inquiries, concerns, or issues related to the content displayed, including potential copyright claims, please contact the original source or provider of the files directly. We are not responsible for resolving any content-related disputes or claims of intellectual property infringement.

D. No Copyright Ownership
We do not claim ownership of any intellectual property contained in the files or data displayed on this website. All copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights remain the sole property of their respective owners. If you believe that content displayed on this website infringes upon your intellectual property rights, please contact the original content provider directly.

E. Fair Use Notice
Some content displayed on this website may fall under the "fair use" provisions of copyright law for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, or educational purposes. If you believe any content violates fair use guidelines, please reach out directly to the original source of the content for resolution.

Virus Scanning for Your Peace of Mind:

The files provided below have already been scanned for viruses by their original source. However, if you’d like to double-check before downloading, you can easily scan them yourself using the following steps:

How to scan a direct download link for viruses:

  • 1- Copy the direct link to the file you want to download (don’t open it yet).
  • (a free online tool) and paste the direct link into the provided field to start the scan.
  • 2- Visit VirusTotal (a free online tool) and paste the direct link into the provided field to start the scan.
  • 3- VirusTotal will scan the file using multiple antivirus vendors to detect any potential threats.
  • 4- Once the scan confirms the file is safe, you can proceed to download it with confidence and enjoy your content.

Available Downloads

  • Source: Internet Archive
  • All Files are Available: Yes
  • Number of Files: 5
  • Number of Available Files: 5
  • Added Date: 2024-01-12 06:02:12
  • Scanner: Internet Archive Python library 1.9.9

Available Files:

1- ZIP

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: ZIP
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: bag.zip
  • Direct Link: Click here

2- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: osf-registrations-x3d2j-v1_files.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

3- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: osf-registrations-x3d2j-v1_meta.sqlite
  • Direct Link: Click here

4- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: osf-registrations-x3d2j-v1_meta.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

5- Archive BitTorrent

  • File origin: metadata
  • File Format: Archive BitTorrent
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: osf-registrations-x3d2j-v1_archive.torrent
  • Direct Link: Click here

Search for “Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction” downloads:

Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.

Find “Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction” in Libraries Near You:

Read or borrow “Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction” from your local library.

Buy “Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction” online:

Shop for “Ties That Bind, Places That Matter: Regional Differences In The Link Between Relationship Status And Life Satisfaction” on popular online marketplaces.