Re-evaluating A Vision-related Quality Of Life Questionnaire With Item Response Theory (IRT) And Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Analyses. - Info and Reading Options

The Internet Archive:

This article is from <a href="//archive.org/search.php?query=journaltitle%3A%28BMC%20Medical%20Research%20Methodology%29" rel="ugc nofollow">BMC Medical Research Methodology</a>, <a href="//archive.org/search.php?query=journaltitle%3A%28BMC%20Medical%20Research%20Methodology%29%20AND%20volume%3A%2811%29" rel="ugc nofollow">volume 11</a>.<h2>Abstract</h2>Background: For the Low Vision Quality Of Life questionnaire (LVQOL) it is unknown whether the psychometric properties are satisfactory when an item response theory (IRT) perspective is considered. This study evaluates some essential psychometric properties of the LVQOL questionnaire in an IRT model, and investigates differential item functioning (DIF). Methods: Cross-sectional data were used from an observational study among visually-impaired patients (n = 296). Calibration was performed for every dimension of the LVQOL in the graded response model. Item goodness-of-fit was assessed with the S-X2-test. DIF was assessed on relevant background variables (i.e. age, gender, visual acuity, eye condition, rehabilitation type and administration type) with likelihood-ratio tests for DIF. The magnitude of DIF was interpreted by assessing the largest difference in expected scores between subgroups. Measurement precision was assessed by presenting test information curves; reliability with the index of subject separation. Results: All items of the LVQOL dimensions fitted the model. There was significant DIF on several items. For two items the maximum difference between expected scores exceeded one point, and DIF was found on multiple relevant background variables. Item 1 'Vision in general' from the "Adjustment" dimension and item 24 'Using tools' from the "Reading and fine work" dimension were removed. Test information was highest for the "Reading and fine work" dimension. Indices for subject separation ranged from 0.83 to 0.94. Conclusions: The items of the LVQOL showed satisfactory item fit to the graded response model; however, two items were removed because of DIF. The adapted LVQOL with 21 items is DIF-free and therefore seems highly appropriate for use in heterogeneous populations of visually impaired patients.

Search for “Re-evaluating A Vision-related Quality Of Life Questionnaire With Item Response Theory (IRT) And Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Analyses.” downloads:

Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.

Find “Re-evaluating A Vision-related Quality Of Life Questionnaire With Item Response Theory (IRT) And Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Analyses.” in Libraries Near You:

Read or borrow “Re-evaluating A Vision-related Quality Of Life Questionnaire With Item Response Theory (IRT) And Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Analyses.” from your local library.

• The WorldCat Libraries Catalog: Find a copy of “Re-evaluating A Vision-related Quality Of Life Questionnaire With Item Response Theory (IRT) And Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Analyses.” at a library near you.