OnStigma: The Impact Of Competence Within Self-stigma Among People With Obesity - Testing The Predictions Of The SCM And The BIAS Map - Info and Reading Options

The Internet Archive:

People suffering from obesity are one of the most affected groups by public and self-stigma (Alimoradi et al. 2020; Emmer et al. 2020; Robinson et al. 2020). This is problematic since public and self-stigma are related to several negative outcomes, for example reduced metal health (Ilic et al. 2013), reduced well-being (Kao et al. 2016), increased symptom severity (Boyd et al. 2014) or suicidality (Oexle et al. 2018). Self-stigma, as well as public stigma, can be described with the aid of three elements: stereotypes (cognitions), prejudice (emotions), and discrimination (behavior) (Corrigan und Watson 2002). Public stigma has already been observed based on the Stereotype Content Model (SCM, (Fiske et al. 2002) and the BIAS map (Cuddy et al. 2007; Sadler et al. 2015). The SCM and the BIAS map are valuable when examining public stigma because they make specific predictions of stereotypes, prejudice (emotions), and discrimination, and their interactions. However, the applicability of those theories to self-stigma has not been demonstrated yet. A better understanding of self-stigma in obesity (by applying the SCM and the BIAS map) seems valuable because of the high prevalence. So, this study aims to apply the SCM and BIAS map to self-stigma among people with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) in an experimental design. Theoretical assumptions (e.g. (Abele et al. 2021) as well as our previous cross-sectional study indicate that the fundamental stereotype dimension competence has more impact within the process of self-stigma than the dimension warmth. Therefore, this study aims to experimentally validate the predictions of the Stereotype Content Model (Fiske et al. 2002) and the BIAS map (Cuddy et al. 2007) within the theoretical framework of self-stigma focusing on the stereotype dimension competence. Assuming that self-stigma results from a multi-stage process including stereotype awareness, stereotype agreement, and self-concurrence (Corrigan et al. 2006), we try to manipulate a stereotype (cognition) referring to one’s competence to prove the model-based predictions. To do so, we conduct an online experiment. After baseline assessment (T0), participants go through a performance test and receive standardized video feedback. We investigate whether the feedback induces a low vs. neutral vs. high competence evaluation (referring to the self) and whether this is able to influence the theoretically predicted emotions (contempt, pity, envy, [fear, anger, shame]) and behavior tendencies (active and passive self-harm) at two-time points – immediately after the manipulated feedback (T+1) and again after 24 hours (T+2). Beyond that, potential moderators (e.g., depressiveness, anxiety, personality traits) will be observed in a pre-assessment (T-1) that chronologically takes place before the baseline assessment.

Search for “OnStigma: The Impact Of Competence Within Self-stigma Among People With Obesity - Testing The Predictions Of The SCM And The BIAS Map” downloads:

Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.

Find “OnStigma: The Impact Of Competence Within Self-stigma Among People With Obesity - Testing The Predictions Of The SCM And The BIAS Map” in Libraries Near You:

Read or borrow “OnStigma: The Impact Of Competence Within Self-stigma Among People With Obesity - Testing The Predictions Of The SCM And The BIAS Map” from your local library.

• The WorldCat Libraries Catalog: Find a copy of “OnStigma: The Impact Of Competence Within Self-stigma Among People With Obesity - Testing The Predictions Of The SCM And The BIAS Map” at a library near you.