Managing The Data Deluge: Data-driven GO Category Assignment Improves While Complexity Of Functional Annotation Increases. - Info and Reading Options

The Internet Archive:

This article is from <a href="//archive.org/search.php?query=journaltitle%3A%28Database:%20The%20Journal%20of%20Biological%20Databases%20and%20Curation%29" rel="ugc nofollow">Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation</a>, <a href="//archive.org/search.php?query=journaltitle%3A%28Database:%20The%20Journal%20of%20Biological%20Databases%20and%20Curation%29%20AND%20volume%3A%282013%29" rel="ugc nofollow">volume 2013</a>.<h2>Abstract</h2>The available curated data lag behind current biological knowledge contained in the literature. Text mining can assist biologists and curators to locate and access this knowledge, for instance by characterizing the functional profile of publications. Gene Ontology (GO) category assignment in free text already supports various applications, such as powering ontology-based search engines, finding curation-relevant articles (triage) or helping the curator to identify and encode functions. Popular text mining tools for GO classification are based on so called thesaurus-based—or dictionary-based—approaches, which exploit similarities between the input text and GO terms themselves. But their effectiveness remains limited owing to the complex nature of GO terms, which rarely occur in text. In contrast, machine learning approaches exploit similarities between the input text and already curated instances contained in a knowledge base to infer a functional profile. GO Annotations (GOA) and MEDLINE make possible to exploit a growing amount of curated abstracts (97 000 in November 2012) for populating this knowledge base. Our study compares a state-of-the-art thesaurus-based system with a machine learning system (based on a k-Nearest Neighbours algorithm) for the task of proposing a functional profile for unseen MEDLINE abstracts, and shows how resources and performances have evolved. Systems are evaluated on their ability to propose for a given abstract the GO terms (2.8 on average) used for curation in GOA. We show that since 2006, although a massive effort was put into adding synonyms in GO (+300%), our thesaurus-based system effectiveness is rather constant, reaching from 0.28 to 0.31 for Recall at 20 (R20). In contrast, thanks to its knowledge base growth, our machine learning system has steadily improved, reaching from 0.38 in 2006 to 0.56 for R20 in 2012. Integrated in semi-automatic workflows or in fully automatic pipelines, such systems are more and more efficient to provide assistance to biologists.Database URL:http://eagl.unige.ch/GOCat/

Search for “Managing The Data Deluge: Data-driven GO Category Assignment Improves While Complexity Of Functional Annotation Increases.” downloads:

Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.

Find “Managing The Data Deluge: Data-driven GO Category Assignment Improves While Complexity Of Functional Annotation Increases.” in Libraries Near You:

Read or borrow “Managing The Data Deluge: Data-driven GO Category Assignment Improves While Complexity Of Functional Annotation Increases.” from your local library.

• The WorldCat Libraries Catalog: Find a copy of “Managing The Data Deluge: Data-driven GO Category Assignment Improves While Complexity Of Functional Annotation Increases.” at a library near you.