ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures - Info and Reading Options
By ERIC
"ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures" and the language of the book is English.
“ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures” Metadata:
- Title: ➤ ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures
- Author: ERIC
- Language: English
Edition Identifiers:
- Internet Archive ID: ERIC_EJ925426
AI-generated Review of “ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures”:
"ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures" Description:
The Internet Archive:
Using Functional Measurement (Anderson, 2008), Frileux, Lelievre, Munoz Sastre, Mullet, and Sorum (2003) examined the joint impact of several key factors on lay people's judgments of the acceptability of physicians' interventions to end patients' lives. The level of acceptability was high, and the information integration rule that best described the participants' judgments was Acceptability = Patient's Request + Patient's Age + Residual Suffering + Incurability. Critics suggested, however, that acceptability was high because the ethical problem was framed in terms of acceptability (Murphy, 2007). Presenting participants with acceptability scales may have caused the life-ending procedure to be represented in participants' mind as basically "acceptable". By contrast, presenting participants with unacceptability scales might cause the procedure to be represented as basically "unacceptable". In the present study, therefore, we directly compared lay people's judgments of the acceptability of life-ending procedures under two opposite conditions--an acceptability condition, and an unacceptability condition. The life-ending procedure did not appear as more acceptable to participants responding in terms of acceptability than to those responding in terms of unacceptability. In addition, the impacts of the factors describing the end-of-life situations were not affected by the type of judgment scale that was used. Functional Measurement seems to be resistant to goal-framing effects; the findings that have been observed using acceptability scales can be considered as robust. (Contains 2 figures.)
Read “ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures”:
Read “ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures” by choosing from the options below.
Available Downloads for “ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures”:
"ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures" is available for download from The Internet Archive in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 6.18 Mbs, and the file-s went public at Sun Sep 30 2018.
Legal and Safety Notes
Copyright Disclaimer and Liability Limitation:
A. Automated Content Display
The creation of this page is fully automated. All data, including text, images, and links, is displayed exactly as received from its original source, without any modification, alteration, or verification. We do not claim ownership of, nor assume any responsibility for, the accuracy or legality of this content.
B. Liability Disclaimer for External Content
The files provided below are solely the responsibility of their respective originators. We disclaim any and all liability, whether direct or indirect, for the content, accuracy, legality, or any other aspect of these files. By using this website, you acknowledge that we have no control over, nor endorse, the content hosted by external sources.
C. Inquiries and Disputes
For any inquiries, concerns, or issues related to the content displayed, including potential copyright claims, please contact the original source or provider of the files directly. We are not responsible for resolving any content-related disputes or claims of intellectual property infringement.
D. No Copyright Ownership
We do not claim ownership of any intellectual property contained in the files or data displayed on this website. All copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights remain the sole property of their respective owners. If you believe that content displayed on this website infringes upon your intellectual property rights, please contact the original content provider directly.
E. Fair Use Notice
Some content displayed on this website may fall under the "fair use" provisions of copyright law for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, or educational purposes. If you believe any content violates fair use guidelines, please reach out directly to the original source of the content for resolution.
Virus Scanning for Your Peace of Mind:
The files provided below have already been scanned for viruses by their original source. However, if you’d like to double-check before downloading, you can easily scan them yourself using the following steps:
How to scan a direct download link for viruses:
- 1- Copy the direct link to the file you want to download (don’t open it yet). (a free online tool) and paste the direct link into the provided field to start the scan.
- 2- Visit VirusTotal (a free online tool) and paste the direct link into the provided field to start the scan.
- 3- VirusTotal will scan the file using multiple antivirus vendors to detect any potential threats.
- 4- Once the scan confirms the file is safe, you can proceed to download it with confidence and enjoy your content.
Available Downloads
- Source: Internet Archive
- Internet Archive Link: Archive.org page
- All Files are Available: Yes
- Number of Files: 11
- Number of Available Files: 11
- Added Date: 2018-09-30 10:35:18
- PPI (Pixels Per Inch): 300
- OCR: ABBYY FineReader 11.0 (Extended OCR)
Available Files:
1- Text PDF
- File origin: original
- File Format: Text PDF
- File Size: 0.00 Mbs
- File Name: ERIC_EJ925426.pdf
- Direct Link: Click here
2- Metadata
- File origin: original
- File Format: Metadata
- File Size: 0.00 Mbs
- File Name: ERIC_EJ925426_files.xml
- Direct Link: Click here
3- Metadata
- File origin: original
- File Format: Metadata
- File Size: 0.00 Mbs
- File Name: ERIC_EJ925426_meta.sqlite
- Direct Link: Click here
4- Metadata
- File origin: original
- File Format: Metadata
- File Size: 0.00 Mbs
- File Name: ERIC_EJ925426_meta.xml
- Direct Link: Click here
5- Item Tile
- File origin: original
- File Format: Item Tile
- File Size: 0.00 Mbs
- File Name: __ia_thumb.jpg
- Direct Link: Click here
6- Abbyy GZ
- File origin: derivative
- File Format: Abbyy GZ
- File Size: 0.00 Mbs
- File Name: ERIC_EJ925426_abbyy.gz
- Direct Link: Click here
7- DjVuTXT
- File origin: derivative
- File Format: DjVuTXT
- File Size: 0.00 Mbs
- File Name: ERIC_EJ925426_djvu.txt
- Direct Link: Click here
8- Djvu XML
- File origin: derivative
- File Format: Djvu XML
- File Size: 0.00 Mbs
- File Name: ERIC_EJ925426_djvu.xml
- Direct Link: Click here
9- Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP
- File origin: derivative
- File Format: Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP
- File Size: 0.01 Mbs
- File Name: ERIC_EJ925426_jp2.zip
- Direct Link: Click here
10- Scandata
- File origin: derivative
- File Format: Scandata
- File Size: 0.00 Mbs
- File Name: ERIC_EJ925426_scandata.xml
- Direct Link: Click here
11- Archive BitTorrent
- File origin: metadata
- File Format: Archive BitTorrent
- File Size: 0.00 Mbs
- File Name: ERIC_EJ925426_archive.torrent
- Direct Link: Click here
Search for “ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures” downloads:
Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.
Find “ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures” in Libraries Near You:
Read or borrow “ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures” from your local library.
Buy “ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures” online:
Shop for “ERIC EJ925426: Do Ethical Judgments Depend On The Type Of Response Scale? Comparing Acceptability Versus Unacceptability Judgments In The Case Of Life-Ending Procedures” on popular online marketplaces.
- Ebay: New and used books.