Downloads & Free Reading Options - Results

A Discussion with Alexander Galloway, Ian James, and John Ó Maoilearca: Many philosophies claim to be practical: performativity, praxis, practice-based thought, truth procedures and enquiries, and even artistic performance have each been connected to various philosophical positions. So what, if anything, makes François Laruelle’s Non-Standard Philosophy different? ‘What Can We Do With Non-Philosophy?’ brings together three researchers whose work aims in part to elucidate the theoretical-practical uses of Non-Philosophy in a range of fields from science studies, through media studies, to animal and film studies. In each case they ask: how can this ‘future thought’ change the relation of theory to practice? What can be done with non-philosophy that changes what we do with anything, or everything, else? Source: http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2015/11/what-can-we-do-with-non-philosophy/

A Discussion with Alexander Galloway, Ian James, and John Ó Maoilearca: Many philosophies claim to be practical: performativity, praxis, practice-based thought, truth procedures and enquiries, and even artistic performance have each been connected to various philosophical positions. So what, if anything, makes François Laruelle’s Non-Standard Philosophy different? ‘What Can We Do With Non-Philosophy?’ brings together three researchers whose work aims in part to elucidate the theoretical-practical uses of Non-Philosophy in a range of fields from science studies, through media studies, to animal and film studies. In each case they ask: how can this ‘future thought’ change the relation of theory to practice? What can be done with non-philosophy that changes what we do with anything, or everything, else? Source: http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2015/11/what-can-we-do-with-non-philosophy/

A Discussion with Alexander Galloway, Ian James, and John Ó Maoilearca: Many philosophies claim to be practical: performativity, praxis, practice-based thought, truth procedures and enquiries, and even artistic performance have each been connected to various philosophical positions. So what, if anything, makes François Laruelle’s Non-Standard Philosophy different? ‘What Can We Do With Non-Philosophy?’ brings together three researchers whose work aims in part to elucidate the theoretical-practical uses of Non-Philosophy in a range of fields from science studies, through media studies, to animal and film studies. In each case they ask: how can this ‘future thought’ change the relation of theory to practice? What can be done with non-philosophy that changes what we do with anything, or everything, else? Source: http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2015/11/what-can-we-do-with-non-philosophy/

A Discussion with Alexander Galloway, Ian James, and John Ó Maoilearca: Many philosophies claim to be practical: performativity, praxis, practice-based thought, truth procedures and enquiries, and even artistic performance have each been connected to various philosophical positions. So what, if anything, makes François Laruelle’s Non-Standard Philosophy different? ‘What Can We Do With Non-Philosophy?’ brings together three researchers whose work aims in part to elucidate the theoretical-practical uses of Non-Philosophy in a range of fields from science studies, through media studies, to animal and film studies. In each case they ask: how can this ‘future thought’ change the relation of theory to practice? What can be done with non-philosophy that changes what we do with anything, or everything, else? Source: http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2015/11/what-can-we-do-with-non-philosophy/

A Discussion with Alexander Galloway, Ian James, and John Ó Maoilearca: Many philosophies claim to be practical: performativity, praxis, practice-based thought, truth procedures and enquiries, and even artistic performance have each been connected to various philosophical positions. So what, if anything, makes François Laruelle’s Non-Standard Philosophy different? ‘What Can We Do With Non-Philosophy?’ brings together three researchers whose work aims in part to elucidate the theoretical-practical uses of Non-Philosophy in a range of fields from science studies, through media studies, to animal and film studies. In each case they ask: how can this ‘future thought’ change the relation of theory to practice? What can be done with non-philosophy that changes what we do with anything, or everything, else? Source: http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2015/11/what-can-we-do-with-non-philosophy/

Event Date: 10 November 2015 Swedenborg Hall 20-21 Bloomsbury Way London WC1A 2TH The London Graduate School presents: What Can We Do With Non-Philosophy? A Discussion with Alexander Galloway, Ian James, and John Ó Maoilearca…

There is little hope that any single philosophy of health education will emerge to become dominant in the foreseeable future. Rather, our culture encourages a range of philosophical assumptions, valuing diversity more than consistency. It is the assumption of this brief paper that most perspectives or philosophical positions can be represented best in the form of a continuum implying that a number of positions can be taken between the two extremes. The first of these is titled, "What do you want to happen?" The far left is labeled thinking/decision-making, and the far right is labeled specific behavior change. This can lead to another continuum that reflects some basic assumptions about the nature of the human individuals who are educated. This is labeled, "What should be the focus of health education?", with behavior reinforcement on the left of the continuum and behavior on the right. An increasingly important philosophical difference arises from a trend in American culture and is labeled, "What is success in health educating?" Functioning is on the left of the continuum, and rule-following is on the right side. Because of different settings for health education, different age learnings, different degrees of emergency in the message, and different backgrounds and temperaments of those who claim the professional title, we shall continue to have different philosophies. (SK)