Downloads & Free Reading Options - Results

Article is devoted to the problems which Russian higher education institutions face at management of intellectual property and to searching optimum ways of their solution. the reasons for low activity of higher educational institutions in the field of protection and commercialization of R&D results are analyzed; the European experience of management of intellectual property rights of universities is investigated. Recommendations on more effective management of intellectual property in a university are elaborated.

Article is devoted to the problems which Russian higher education institutions face at management of intellectual property and to searching optimum ways of their solution. the reasons for low activity of higher educational institutions in the field of protection and commercialization of R&D results are analyzed; the European experience of management of intellectual property rights of universities is investigated. Recommendations on more effective management of intellectual property in a university are elaborated.

Article is devoted to the problems which Russian higher education institutions face at management of intellectual property and to searching optimum ways of their solution. the reasons for low activity of higher educational institutions in the field of protection and commercialization of R&D results are analyzed; the European experience of management of intellectual property rights of universities is investigated. Recommendations on more effective management of intellectual property in a university are elaborated.

The Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, Committee on the Judiciary met, pursuant to call, at 2:15 p.m., in Room 2141, Rayburn House Office Building, to review the consumer benefits of today's digital rights management (DRM) solutions. The Honorable Howard Coble, a Representative in Congress from North Carolina and Chairman of the Subcommittee, presided. Opening statements are provided by the Honorable Howard Coble; the Honorable Howard L. Berman, a Representative in Congress from California, and Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property; and the Honorable Rick Boucher, a Representative in Congress from Virginia. The following witnesses provided oral testimonies and prepared statements: Mr. Will Poole, Vice President, Windows New Media Platforms Division, Microsoft Corporation Oral Testimony; Mr. James Alexander, Director, eBooks Publishing Adobe Systems, Inc.; Mr. Peter Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer, SunnComm, Inc.; and Mr. Frank Hausmann, Chief Executive Officer, CenterSpan Communications Corporation.Letters, statements, etc., submitted for the Hearing included: prepared statement of the Honorable Howard L. Berman; and prepared statement of the Honorable Zoe Lofgren, a Representative in Congress from California. An Appendix includes the following, submitted for the Hearing Record: prepared statement of William Krepick, President and CEO, Macrovision Corporation; prepared statement of Neil MacDonald, Vice President, Director of Research, Gartner; letter from Jonathan Zuck, President of Association for Competitive Technology; and letter from Chris Hoofnagle, Legislative Counsel, Electronic Privacy Information Center, Jason Young, IPIOP Clerk, Electronic Privacy Information Center, and Fred von Lohmann, Senior IP Attorney, Electronic Frontier Foundation. (AEF)

Introduction. Currently, a unified methodological concept for assessing the processes of intellectual property development at the regional level has not been formed. The predominant number of methods assessing the development of the sphere are based on the rating assessment of integral indicators. The methodology of strategic mapping is also be­ing applied. This paper proposes a methodological approach to assess­ing the maturity of intellectual property management processes based on the "IP portfolio of the region" model. In the practice of modern man­agement, the portfolio method is used to collect system reflection on the evaluated activity and present its results. In the field of intellectual property, this approach is successfully applied in the corporate prac­tice of RID management. For the purposes of managing the intellectual property sphere at the regional level, this method can be considered as innovative. Methods. The research methodology was based on the ap­plication of general scientific methods, such as: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, construction and verification of hypotheses, comparison, modeling. Empirical data were processed using economet­ric models. Logical means of cognition were used in the formulation of conclusions. Results and Discussion. The developed methodological approach makes it possible to assess the maturity of intellectual prop­erty management processes at the level of the subject of the Russian Federation. The subject matter of the objects of the "IP portfolio of the region" includes: objects of patent rights, means of individualization, computer programs, databases. The model is based on a system of co­efficient-type indicators. The scales of ranking of regions based on the estimates of the "IP portfolio of the region" model are substantiated. The source of information for calculating the values of indicators are the databases of Rospatent and Rosstat. Conclusion. The results of the study are of practical significance and can be applied in the develop­ment of intellectual property development policy at the national and regional levels.

Introduction. There is a regional policy focus on the IP management due to the increasing role in global value chains and the competitive environment for regional goods and services. The development of a re­gional intellectual property market is particularly important in the face of sanctions challenges. The Federal Service for Intellectual Property works with the regions of the Russian Federation in various areas, the main of which are cooperation within the creation of Technology and Innovation Support Centres and the implementation of tripartite agreements. Methods. Methods of patent analysis, analysis of norma­tive regulations in the field of state regulation and support of innova­tive entrepreneurship and inventors in regions were used. Results and Discussion. Rospatent and the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia determined the composition of indicators that should be considered in the forecast values of the development of the IP area. In 2021, all planned values that assess the effectiveness of the imple­mentation of agreements were achieved. In 2021, Federal Institute for Industrial Property (FIPS) specialists developed Methodological Recommendations for the regions on the formation of a strategic vi­sion and the definition of target indicators for the development of the IP area and Methodological Recommendations for the regions on the construction of an IP management system. Rospatent accumulates and analyzes information on the creation of its own IP management sys­tems in the regions, including mechanisms of state support for innova­tive entrepreneurship and inventors. Conclusion. The challenges faced by the Russian economy directly affect the area of intellectual property. Currently, projects are actively implemented under the Business Climate Transformation Action Plan "Intellectual Property", including the crea­tion of the necessary tax conditions. In 2021, 15 customer-centric servic­es for the provision of public services based on modern domestic digital technologies were created. They are now being tested and will soon be put into operation.