Downloads & Free Reading Options - Results

According to the WHO, hearing loss occurs in 3% of children, of which 0.03% are children with severe and profound sensorineural hearing loss. Persistent hearing impairment in children is a serious problem for the child population. Chronic sensorineural hearing loss in children is the focus of many researchers. The factors affecting the organs of hearing of a growing organism do not decrease; in modern conditions, they acquire more and more importance (l). The vast experience of complex therapy for hearing loss in children has a character of insufficient effectiveness, which predetermines the search for new non-drug methods of treatment, the development of new approaches to the social adaptation of children with hearing loss. Hearing impairment of a child leads to impaired speech and mental development. Early diagnosis of hearing disorders and adequate rehabilitation can prevent a child's psycho-speech deviation  Djurabekova Aziza, Abdullayeva Nargiza, & Samatov Farrukh. (2020). Structural causes and prevalence of neurosensoral hearing loss in children in Samarkand region. International Journal of Human Computing Studies, 2(5), 5-7. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijhcs.v2i5.896 Pdf Url : https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJHCS/article/view/896/849 Paper Url : https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJHCS/article/view/896

This article is from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience , volume 7 . Abstract The absence of auditory input, particularly during development, causes widespread changes in the structure and function of the auditory system, extending from peripheral structures into auditory cortex. In humans, the consequences of these changes are far-reaching and often include detriments to language acquisition, and associated psychosocial issues. Much of what is currently known about the nature of deafness-related changes to auditory structures comes from studies of congenitally deaf or early-deafened animal models. Fortunately, the mammalian auditory system shows a high degree of preservation among species, allowing for generalization from these models to the human auditory system. This review begins with a comparison of common methods used to obtain deaf animal models, highlighting the specific advantages and anatomical consequences of each. Some consideration is also given to the effectiveness of methods used to measure hearing loss during and following deafening procedures. The structural and functional consequences of congenital and early-onset deafness have been examined across a variety of mammals. This review attempts to summarize these changes, which often involve alteration of hair cells and supporting cells in the cochleae, and anatomical and physiological changes that extend through subcortical structures and into cortex. The nature of these changes is discussed, and the impacts to neural processing are addressed. Finally, long-term changes in cortical structures are discussed, with a focus on the presence or absence of cross-modal plasticity. In addition to being of interest to our understanding of multisensory processing, these changes also have important implications for the use of assistive devices such as cochlear implants.

This article is from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience , volume 7 . Abstract The absence of auditory input, particularly during development, causes widespread changes in the structure and function of the auditory system, extending from peripheral structures into auditory cortex. In humans, the consequences of these changes are far-reaching and often include detriments to language acquisition, and associated psychosocial issues. Much of what is currently known about the nature of deafness-related changes to auditory structures comes from studies of congenitally deaf or early-deafened animal models. Fortunately, the mammalian auditory system shows a high degree of preservation among species, allowing for generalization from these models to the human auditory system. This review begins with a comparison of common methods used to obtain deaf animal models, highlighting the specific advantages and anatomical consequences of each. Some consideration is also given to the effectiveness of methods used to measure hearing loss during and following deafening procedures. The structural and functional consequences of congenital and early-onset deafness have been examined across a variety of mammals. This review attempts to summarize these changes, which often involve alteration of hair cells and supporting cells in the cochleae, and anatomical and physiological changes that extend through subcortical structures and into cortex. The nature of these changes is discussed, and the impacts to neural processing are addressed. Finally, long-term changes in cortical structures are discussed, with a focus on the presence or absence of cross-modal plasticity. In addition to being of interest to our understanding of multisensory processing, these changes also have important implications for the use of assistive devices such as cochlear implants.

3-Member Structural Panel Hearing - 2013-10-09

3-Member Structural Hearing Panel - 2013-04-10

MUSIC THEORY BOOK

MUSIC THEORY BOOK

MUSIC THEORY BOOK

Government Publishing Office U.S. Congress House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture HEARING TO REVIEW STRUCTURAL CHANGES THAT ARE TAKING PLACE IN THE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY AND THEIR IMPACTS Date(s) Held: 2007-10-18 110th Congress, 1st Session GPO Document Source: CHRG-110hhrg50024 Superintendents of Documents ID: Y 4.AG 8/1 Witnesses: Collins, Ph.D., Keith, Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C Gruenspecht, Ph.D., Howard, Deputy Administrator, U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C Westhoff, Ph.D., Patrick, Research Associate Professor and Program Co-Director, Department of Agricultural Economics, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, University of Missouri--Columbia, Columbia, MO Related Items: Congressional Serial No. 110-31

Government Publishing Office U.S. Congress House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture HEARING TO REVIEW STRUCTURAL CHANGES THAT ARE TAKING PLACE IN THE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY AND THEIR IMPACTS Date(s) Held: 2007-10-18 110th Congress, 1st Session GPO Document Source: CHRG-110hhrg50024 Superintendents of Documents ID: Y 4.AG 8/1 Witnesses: Collins, Ph.D., Keith, Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C Gruenspecht, Ph.D., Howard, Deputy Administrator, U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C Westhoff, Ph.D., Patrick, Research Associate Professor and Program Co-Director, Department of Agricultural Economics, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, University of Missouri--Columbia, Columbia, MO Related Items: Congressional Serial No. 110-31

Government Publishing Office U.S. Congress House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture HEARING TO REVIEW STRUCTURAL CHANGES THAT ARE TAKING PLACE IN THE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY AND THEIR IMPACTS Date(s) Held: 2007-10-18 110th Congress, 1st Session GPO Document Source: CHRG-110hhrg50024 Superintendents of Documents ID: Y 4.AG 8/1 Witnesses: Collins, Ph.D., Keith, Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C Gruenspecht, Ph.D., Howard, Deputy Administrator, U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C Westhoff, Ph.D., Patrick, Research Associate Professor and Program Co-Director, Department of Agricultural Economics, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, University of Missouri--Columbia, Columbia, MO Related Items: Congressional Serial No. 110-31

Government Publishing Office U.S. Congress House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture HEARING TO REVIEW STRUCTURAL CHANGES THAT ARE TAKING PLACE IN THE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY AND THEIR IMPACTS Date(s) Held: 2007-10-18 110th Congress, 1st Session GPO Document Source: CHRG-110hhrg50024 Superintendents of Documents ID: Y 4.AG 8/1 Witnesses: Collins, Ph.D., Keith, Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C Gruenspecht, Ph.D., Howard, Deputy Administrator, U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C Westhoff, Ph.D., Patrick, Research Associate Professor and Program Co-Director, Department of Agricultural Economics, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, University of Missouri--Columbia, Columbia, MO Related Items: Congressional Serial No. 110-31

MUSIC THEORY BOOK

A school's primary responsibility is to provide students with a high-quality education. However, children cannot learn to their fullest potential with unmet health needs. For over thirty years, Medicaid has helped cover the costs for certain medically necessary services provided in school-based settings to children eligible for special education services. Medicaid can also reimburse school districts for health and mental health services delivered in schools to Medicaid enrolled students and for providing other screening, diagnosis and treatment services like vision and hearing screenings, and diabetes and asthma management. As districts are faced with more children with critical health and mental health care needs and increasing demands for school personnel to provide those services, the American Association of School Administrators (AASA) has sought a solution that will enable more districts--large, small, urban, and rural, high-poverty and low-poverty--to participate in the Medicaid program. In December 2018, AASA surveyed over 750 school leaders in 41 states about their participation in the school-based Medicaid program and found the complex administrative and paperwork requirements necessary to obtain Medicaid reimbursement significantly hindered school district participation in the program. The AASA report outlines how Congress and the Administration must work together to provide States with the flexibility to reduce the administrative burdens that unfairly diminish the amount of reimbursement school districts receive, or worse, create insurmountable barriers that freeze out schools from even attempting to receive reimbursement. The passage of federal legislation titled "The Improving Medicaid in Schools Act" would allow states to implement a uniform, cost-based reimbursement methodology that would ensure districts of all sizes can be reimbursed by Medicaid for meeting the healthcare needs of their students regardless of their administrative capacity and student population. The proposal leverages an existing and proven process for Medicaid claiming that ensures strong accountability measures are still in place, but that will simultaneously reduce the burden on State Medicaid Agencies and insurance companies to manage and respond to a high volume of Medicaid transactions from districts. At a time when we have an uptick in children who lack health insurance coverage and a surge in children coming to school with unaddressed mental health needs, there is an urgency to improve the reimbursement stream for school-based Medicaid programs so schools can deliver more services to more students. [For the main report, see ED602004.]

A school's primary responsibility is to provide students with a high-quality education. However, children cannot learn to their fullest potential with unmet health needs. For over thirty years, Medicaid has helped cover the costs for certain medically necessary services provided in school-based settings to children eligible for special education services. Medicaid can also reimburse school districts for health and mental health services delivered in schools to Medicaid enrolled students and for providing other screening, diagnosis and treatment services like vision and hearing screenings, and diabetes and asthma management. As districts are faced with more children with critical health and mental health care needs and increasing demands for school personnel to provide those services, the American Association of School Administrators (AASA) has sought a solution that will enable more districts--large, small, urban, and rural, high-poverty and low-poverty--to participate in the Medicaid program. In December 2018, AASA surveyed over 750 school leaders in 41 states about their participation in the school-based Medicaid program and found the complex administrative and paperwork requirements necessary to obtain Medicaid reimbursement significantly hindered school district participation in the program. The AASA report outlines how Congress and the Administration must work together to provide States with the flexibility to reduce the administrative burdens that unfairly diminish the amount of reimbursement school districts receive, or worse, create insurmountable barriers that freeze out schools from even attempting to receive reimbursement. The passage of federal legislation titled "The Improving Medicaid in Schools Act" would allow states to implement a uniform, cost-based reimbursement methodology that would ensure districts of all sizes can be reimbursed by Medicaid for meeting the healthcare needs of their students regardless of their administrative capacity and student population. The proposal leverages an existing and proven process for Medicaid claiming that ensures strong accountability measures are still in place, but that will simultaneously reduce the burden on State Medicaid Agencies and insurance companies to manage and respond to a high volume of Medicaid transactions from districts. At a time when we have an uptick in children who lack health insurance coverage and a surge in children coming to school with unaddressed mental health needs, there is an urgency to improve the reimbursement stream for school-based Medicaid programs so schools can deliver more services to more students. [For the main report, see ED602004.]

A school's primary responsibility is to provide students with a high-quality education. However, children cannot learn to their fullest potential with unmet health needs. For over thirty years, Medicaid has helped cover the costs for certain medically necessary services provided in school-based settings to children eligible for special education services. Medicaid can also reimburse school districts for health and mental health services delivered in schools to Medicaid enrolled students and for providing other screening, diagnosis and treatment services like vision and hearing screenings, and diabetes and asthma management. As districts are faced with more children with critical health and mental health care needs and increasing demands for school personnel to provide those services, the American Association of School Administrators (AASA) has sought a solution that will enable more districts--large, small, urban, and rural, high-poverty and low-poverty--to participate in the Medicaid program. In December 2018, AASA surveyed over 750 school leaders in 41 states about their participation in the school-based Medicaid program and found the complex administrative and paperwork requirements necessary to obtain Medicaid reimbursement significantly hindered school district participation in the program. The AASA report outlines how Congress and the Administration must work together to provide States with the flexibility to reduce the administrative burdens that unfairly diminish the amount of reimbursement school districts receive, or worse, create insurmountable barriers that freeze out schools from even attempting to receive reimbursement. The passage of federal legislation titled "The Improving Medicaid in Schools Act" would allow states to implement a uniform, cost-based reimbursement methodology that would ensure districts of all sizes can be reimbursed by Medicaid for meeting the healthcare needs of their students regardless of their administrative capacity and student population. The proposal leverages an existing and proven process for Medicaid claiming that ensures strong accountability measures are still in place, but that will simultaneously reduce the burden on State Medicaid Agencies and insurance companies to manage and respond to a high volume of Medicaid transactions from districts. At a time when we have an uptick in children who lack health insurance coverage and a surge in children coming to school with unaddressed mental health needs, there is an urgency to improve the reimbursement stream for school-based Medicaid programs so schools can deliver more services to more students. [For the main report, see ED602004.]

A school's primary responsibility is to provide students with a high-quality education. However, children cannot learn to their fullest potential with unmet health needs. For over thirty years, Medicaid has helped cover the costs for certain medically necessary services provided in school-based settings to children eligible for special education services. Medicaid can also reimburse school districts for health and mental health services delivered in schools to Medicaid enrolled students and for providing other screening, diagnosis and treatment services like vision and hearing screenings, and diabetes and asthma management. As districts are faced with more children with critical health and mental health care needs and increasing demands for school personnel to provide those services, the American Association of School Administrators (AASA) has sought a solution that will enable more districts--large, small, urban, and rural, high-poverty and low-poverty--to participate in the Medicaid program. In December 2018, AASA surveyed over 750 school leaders in 41 states about their participation in the school-based Medicaid program and found the complex administrative and paperwork requirements necessary to obtain Medicaid reimbursement significantly hindered school district participation in the program. The AASA report outlines how Congress and the Administration must work together to provide States with the flexibility to reduce the administrative burdens that unfairly diminish the amount of reimbursement school districts receive, or worse, create insurmountable barriers that freeze out schools from even attempting to receive reimbursement. The passage of federal legislation titled "The Improving Medicaid in Schools Act" would allow states to implement a uniform, cost-based reimbursement methodology that would ensure districts of all sizes can be reimbursed by Medicaid for meeting the healthcare needs of their students regardless of their administrative capacity and student population. The proposal leverages an existing and proven process for Medicaid claiming that ensures strong accountability measures are still in place, but that will simultaneously reduce the burden on State Medicaid Agencies and insurance companies to manage and respond to a high volume of Medicaid transactions from districts. At a time when we have an uptick in children who lack health insurance coverage and a surge in children coming to school with unaddressed mental health needs, there is an urgency to improve the reimbursement stream for school-based Medicaid programs so schools can deliver more services to more students. [For the main report, see ED602004.]