Downloads & Free Reading Options - Results

Beautiful sacred souls! Welcome back to another episode! Today we have a good chat for these odd and transformative days that we are in! We talk discernment, consent, navigating these days and so much more. Thank you all for being here with us. We are learning our new flow of scheduling and working together, and we expect to have two episodes weekly for the podcast, which are also now on our youtube channel if you'd like to watch the convo instead of just listening. We also have worked out our audio challenges! We love you all so much and wish you all the most benevolent, graceful experience of awakening. With tremendous love, Ivy & Kimberly Watch this episode on YouTube HERE ! Email us at [email protected] Instagram: @inspired.sovereignty Telegram: @inspiredsovereignty & @soulfrens Please SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClWyrCHj82O9ACLQ75Dc8Fg Thank you for donations. They help all our creations manifest. Thank you. Venmo: -------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This podcast and the words, conversations, guests, and resources shared are intended to support, encourage, inform and expand thinking to increase self responsibility. Nothing created or shared here is ever intended to diagnose, prescribe, treat or cure. Everyone's health is their own responsibility, and everyone is empowered to exercise wise discernment, educate themselves, ask amazing questions, and seek accurate information and practice informed consent. Always seek a medical or health professional that you trust when you need to. Your body. Your mind. Your soul. Your choice. Your consent. Your authority. You are god, you are sovereign, you are free. And so it is. --- This episode is sponsored by - Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/inspiredsovereigntyradio/messageSupport this podcast: https://anchor.fm/inspiredsovereigntyradio/support

This study investigates the current state of informed consent practices in clinical trials that integrate artificial intelligence (AI), with a focus on identifying ethical gaps and advancing patient-centered transparency. As AI technologies become increasingly embedded in clinical research—ranging from diagnostic support to data analysis—the adequacy of informed consent documents in communicating AI-specific risks and processes remains critically underexamined. Despite growing ethical concerns around algorithmic bias, data privacy, and patient autonomy, there is a lack of large-scale, empirical assessment of how these issues are addressed in real-world consent procedures. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the transparency, comprehensibility, and ethical rigor of informed consent documents across AI-integrated clinical trials globally. Using a systematic review methodology and a hybrid analytical framework grounded in established ethical models, the study assesses how well these documents disclose AI functionality, associated risks, data governance practices, and participant agency. Special attention is given to the influence of regional regulatory environments and risk stratification in shaping consent quality. The expected outcome of this work is the development of a new framework to standardize and enhance informed consent in AI-driven research. Additionally, the project advocates for the adoption of dynamic digital consent platforms that support ongoing participant engagement, granular data control, and adaptive communication as AI systems evolve. By promoting regulatory harmonization, clinician education, and algorithmic accountability, this research aims to transform informed consent from a static procedural requirement into a living, ethically robust process that upholds patient trust and autonomy in the age of artificial intelligence.

This article is from PLoS ONE , volume 9 . Abstract Verifying participant comprehension continues to be a difficult ethical and regulatory challenge for clinical research. An increasing number of articles assessing methods to improve comprehension have been published, but they use a wide range of outcome measures including open-ended, closed-ended, and self-perceived measures of comprehension. Systematic comparisons of different measures have rarely been reported. This study evaluated the likely direction of bias observed when using open-ended, closed-ended, and perceived ease of comprehension measures among women administered a mock informed consent process in Mwanza, Tanzania. Participants were randomized to either a closed-ended or an open-ended assessment of comprehension, administered the consent process for a hypothetical HIV prevention trial in Kiswahili, and then administered a comprehension assessment, per their randomization. They were then asked how easy or hard it was to understand each of the informed consent components measured in the comprehension assessment. Women in the closed-ended arm had significantly higher overall comprehension scores than in the open-ended arm. Perceived scores were significantly higher when compared to both open-ended and close-ended scores within arms but were similar between arms. Findings highlight the importance of comprehension assessments in complex clinical trials that go beyond asking participants if they understand or have any questions. They also indicate the need for continued exploration of objective measures of comprehension in international clinical research settings, so that points in need of clarification can be efficiently and effectively identified and addressed. Such measures would reduce burdens on both staff and participants that result from well-intentioned but potentially unnecessary time spent explaining in unwarranted detail things already understood.

Perma.cc archive of https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/informed-consent created on 2022-04-14 17:46:43.016666+00:00.

ABSTRACT Medical intervention refers to any action taken against the physical and mental structure of the person for the purpose of treatment by an authorized person in the medical field. Medical interventions without legal compliance conditions constitute a crime legally. In order for the intervention to be lawful; The person performing the medical intervention must be a physician, there must be the necessary indication for medical intervention, the patient must have informed consent, and the physician must perform a meticulous medical intervention in accordance with the requirements of medical science. According to our constitution, people have the right to determine their own future. Therefore, the physician must obtain the consent of the patient before intervening in the patient's bodily integrity. The aim of the physician to heal the patient does not give any privilege to the physicians in this regard. According to the legislation, it can be stated that it is more appropriate to make the enlightenment verbally, but it would be more beneficial to put the verbal clarification in writing in terms of proof of the clarification. In order for the patient's consent to be valid, the patient must have a good grasp of the subject to which he or she gave consent. For this reason, the patient should be fully illuminated.

The left will fight to the death. Everything they can throw is being tossed. There is open discussion of the coming coup. Here is the gateway to private contractors. Huge evidence shows that they run the world. There is a groundswell that is unseen. The coms to the traitors have been discovered. Bank accounts and phone calls can tell a lot. They built all the biggest myths. Stay frosty because we know their plans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of the Silent War - A new whistleblower emerges from Dominion. Vaccine Mandates are beginning in The United States. Medical professionals world wide are violating medical ethics standards by failing informed consent requirements per one study, and the DOJ is threatening auditors with jail time for audits using civil rights anti racism laws. Also, section 230 may soon be a moot point, as Dr. Shiva has discovered a MASSIVE new bombshell: Democrats in Government were colluding with Big Tech to censors political opponents - this is 1st amendment territory now! Was our platform also shut down, not by the big tech censor, but by President Trump's political rivals? Do not miss this action packed episode.All of this, and much more.For breaking news from one of the most over the target and censored names in the world join our 100% Free newsletter at www.NemosNewsNetwork.com/newsAlso follow us at Gabhttps://gab.com/nemosnewsnetworkNemos News is 100% listener funded. Thank you for your support in our mission to Break the Cycle of Fake News.If you value our work please consider supporting us with our vetted patriot sponsors!www.NemosNewsNetwork.com/sponsorsShop Patriot & Detox the Deep State with www.RedPillLiving.com, Home of Sleepy Joe - the world's most powerful all natural sleep formula & The Great Awakening Gourmet Coffee for Patriots."Our Specialty, is Waking People Up."Other LinksJoin our Telegram chat: www.NemosNewsNetwork.com/chat

Government Publishing Office U.S. Congress House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform and Oversight OVERSIGHT OF NIH AND FDA: BIOETHICS AND THE ADEQUACY OF INFORMED CONSENT Date(s) Held: 1997-05-08 105th Congress, 1st Session GPO Document Source: CHRG-105hhrg44389 Superintendents of Documents ID: Y 4.G 74/7 Related Items: Congressional Serial No. 105-49

Government Publishing Office U.S. Congress House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform and Oversight OVERSIGHT OF NIH AND FDA: BIOETHICS AND THE ADEQUACY OF INFORMED CONSENT Date(s) Held: 1997-05-08 105th Congress, 1st Session GPO Document Source: CHRG-105hhrg44389 Superintendents of Documents ID: Y 4.G 74/7 Related Items: Congressional Serial No. 105-49

Female sterilization is an irreversible form of contraception that was first used in the 19th century and has developed popularity since. Whilst female sterilization is a choice for some women, other unfortunate women find themselves coerced into the option. There have been several reports of this problem dating back from World War II, whereby women are forced to sterilise or the procedure is even done without their knowledge for several reasons. Human rights as stipulated by the World Health Organization (WHO) as well as the South African constitution are protective of female rights to reproduction and their bodies. One of the ethical principles in the practice of medicine is autonomy, the right to self-governance. Forced and coerced female sterilisation does not only violate their human rights, which is a criminal act, but also their right to exercise autonomy. Informed consent is an essential tool that can be used to eliminate allegations of forced or coerced medical procedure when is obtained correctly with patient given full information on the procedure, right to refuse, benefits, consequences and other options available to them. There have been ongoing reports and medico-legal claims on forced female sterilisation both globally and locally. In South Africa, there is currently a case still under investigation where women living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in Gauteng and Kwa-Zulu Natal have reported forced sterilisation to the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA). This scoping review will look into current practices for consent for sterilisation as well available tools that are currently utilised globally and locally to improve the consent process for female sterilisation. The proposed scoping review will be guided by the enhanced version of Arksey, H., and O’Malley’s scoping review framework and Levac et al 2010 recommendations. We will conduct a comprehensive keyword search for relevant studies published between January 2000 and December 2021, on forced or coerced female sterilisation, issues pertaining to consent process for sterilisation as well as any tools that were developed to improve the consent process for female sterilisation globally from PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost (Academic search complete, CINAHL, MEDLINE) and Web of Science (WoS) databases. In addition, we will search for relevant grey literature from university repositories as well as international organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO). We will present the results of the review using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Extension for Scoping Review). We will employ AtlasTi software package to extract the relevant outcomes from the included articles using content thematic analysis. We will conduct quality appraisal of the included articles using the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018. It is anticipated that the results of the proposed study will inform future research and reveal useful information to guide clinicians counselling women on sterilisation.

Perma.cc archive of https://www.coloradoindependent.com/2010/05/04/colorados-new-informed-consent-bill-celebrated-as-tool-to-fight-racial-profiling/ created on 2022-03-10 21:49:02.827486+00:00.

Sheila Ealey of the movie Vaxxed: From coverup to catastrophe talks about the importance of Parental Rights and Informed Consent when it comes to all medical decisions. #factsonvax www.healthyalternativestovaccinations.com

Dr. Roger McFillin dropped some eye-opening insights on antidepressant drugs in his recent Radically Genuine Podcast episode. Here's a quick rundown: Risk Awareness: - This drug lacks long-term evaluation. - Most studies are only 6 to 8 weeks long. Nature of Depression: - Depression is viewed as a construct, not a disease. - No conclusive biological basis corrected by the drug. Natural Progression: - Improvement in your condition may occur within six months without treatment. Placebo Comparison: - No significant advantage over a placebo pill has been observed. Suicidal Risk: - Taking this pill doubles the risk of becoming suicidal. Permanent Sexual Dysfunction: - A real risk associated with the drug. Adverse Reactions: - Numerous adverse reactions, including potential worsening of depression. Individualized Experience: - Your depression experience is unique, incomparable to others. Time Requirement: - Professional time and support are crucial; therapies may be more beneficial and have fewer risks. Emotional Numbing: - Short-term helpfulness may involve emotional numbing, not to be confused with true antidepressant effects. Stay informed, consult professionals, and make decisions aligned with your unique journey! #InformedConsent #MentalHealthAwareness #AntidepressantFacts

This article is from Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care , volume 3 . Abstract Progress in health care technologies has enabled patients to be better informed about all aspects of health care. Patients' informed consent is a legal regulation and a moral principle which represents patients' rights to take part in the clinical decisions concerning their treatment. With increasing awareness among the patients, the concept of informed consent is also evolving in developing countries like India. It is important for the medical and dental practitioners to have a written and signed informed consent from their patients before performing any invasive or irreversible procedures. Informed consent is also needed when providing medical care to children, foreign patients, and incorporating images of the patients while conducting medical and dental research. The present review addresses some of the vital issues regarding informed consent when providing medical and dental care with current review of the literature.

This article is from Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care , volume 3 . Abstract Progress in health care technologies has enabled patients to be better informed about all aspects of health care. Patients' informed consent is a legal regulation and a moral principle which represents patients' rights to take part in the clinical decisions concerning their treatment. With increasing awareness among the patients, the concept of informed consent is also evolving in developing countries like India. It is important for the medical and dental practitioners to have a written and signed informed consent from their patients before performing any invasive or irreversible procedures. Informed consent is also needed when providing medical care to children, foreign patients, and incorporating images of the patients while conducting medical and dental research. The present review addresses some of the vital issues regarding informed consent when providing medical and dental care with current review of the literature.

this scoping review aims to explore the use, effectiveness, and challenges of eConsent tools, mapping existing evidence and identifying gaps in the literature. We want to have documents available on the oral delivery of informed consent.

In this scoping review, we aimed to (1) Identify the physician-facing decision support tools used in the surgical informed consent process (2) Assess what patient-centered domains are measured by these tools (3) Determine whether the tools are available for older adults and for use in various settings (emergent and elective procedures) (4) Characterize the domains that future tools should measure.

This is what happened when I dared to ask a question while in Dandenong hospital (Australia) with a broken back. Interview with vaccine inventor Professor Nikolai Petrovsky is coming soon...

One of St Lukes four pillars is integrity. Forcing a medical product on employees and vendors violates informed consent and integrity. My Job as a Provider is to respect Patients Freedom & Medical Choices. Informed consent is the bedrock for medical freedom. Our healthcare practitioners as well as those vendors who support the hospital and allow it to function are being mandated to take a product that is not proven safe for the long term. "Just to clarify, I am not anti-vaccine, we are pro-health freedom and the ability to choose what is injected into your body." Join Health Freedom Idaho www.healthfreedomidaho.org #stopthemandate #takeastand

Jefferey Jaxen summarises the Informed Consent process in Ireland [02/09/2016]. We also hear from the public health doctor who runs the immunisation program in Ireland.

This film explains the process by which a patient, who has experienced sexual violence, may provide or withdraw permission to proceed with a forensic medical evaluation before, during, or after the medical exam. This film is intended to be screened for the patient. This film has been produced by the Program on Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones at Physicians for Human Rights and it is intended to complement the training workshops the program convenes for medical, law enforcement, and legal professionals on the collection and documentation of forensic evidence of sexual violence. (English version) For more: http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/issues/rape-in-war/program-on-sexual-violence-in-conflict-zones.html Qu'est-ce que le consentement éclairé? https://youtu.be/K0X084gQ09I Ruhusa ama ridhaa? https://youtu.be/gnzcLop4Fdg

PW Rumble Account: https://rumble.com/c/c-741735 PW Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/PWestoff PW Patreon Account: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=653197... HSA Vax Video: https://twitter.com/UKHSA/status/1709495146792824976 ONS Birth Data: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthsummarytablesenglandandwales/previousReleases

Are Health Care Quality Measures Endangering Informed Consent? In this video, Michelle Cotterman, RN, President of Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom, discusses informed consent and how policies are endangering it and, thus, our human and civil rights. The reality is that more and more, mandatory vaccination policies are being put in place in the workplace and the community. This idea of informed consent is well established by the Nuremburg Code, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, Ohio Revised Code 2317.54, and the major medical organizations (AMA, AAP, etc.). These oppressive policies threaten the very ideals expressed and guaranteed in these documents, as well as our U.S. and state Constitutions. It is time to put an end to the encroaching rules, policies, and laws that seek to take away our informed consent! Donate today at www.ohioamf.org/donate. Join us in working to restore and protect medical freedom and informed consent in Ohio and help us become a shining example to the nation! More about hospital quality measures and how they are calculated: https://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/linking-quality-to-payment.html https://s3.amazonaws.com/assets.fiercemarkets.net/public/004-Healthcare/StrRtg_Dec_QtrUpdtSpecRpt.pdf

WATCH FULL HERE: https://youtu.be/vTsebWFLFdc SUPPORT OUR WORK https://www.judicialwatch.org/donate/thank-youtube/ VISIT OUR WEBSITE http://www.judicialwatch.org

This article is from Journal of Public Health Research , volume 2 . Abstract Abstract: Background: The Center for Transfusion Medicine, Cell Therapy and Cryobiology, Milan, Northern Italy, is the headquarter of the POLI-MI biobank. It co-ordinates the biobank activities of the Fondazione Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan. Such activities require specific safeguarding of donors’ rights and protection of sensitive and genetic data. The Fondazione Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico has set up a project on informed consent with the aim of developing awareness and understanding of this issue. Within this project, it has been decided to evaluate how consent for biobanking material is expressed. Design and methods: The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality and completeness of consent to biobanking in the POLI-MI biobank. This was a retrospective study carried out in 2012 on samples of consent declarations collected by biobank units in 2011. Some units used a single, standard consent model available from a previous POLI-MI biobank workgroup. Other units used models which had been previouly formulated. Evaluation was made using a form that indicated the essential elements of consent. Results: A total of 48 consent declarations were collected using the single, standard model and 84 were collected using other models. The consent declarations that used the single, standard model were found to be the most complete and were filled in better than other models. Conclusions: Progressive adoption of a simple, standard consent model is expected to improve the quality of consent acquisition. Regular audit of the compliance of consent practices with ethical and legal requirements is mandatory to improve the quality of research biobanking.

This article is from Journal of clinical research & bioethics , volume 5 . Abstract Background: International guidelines recommend the use of appropriate informed consent procedures in low literacy research settings because written information is not known to guarantee comprehension of study information. Objectives: This study developed and evaluated a multimedia informed consent tool for people with low literacy in an area where a malaria treatment trial was being planned in The Gambia. Methods: We developed the informed consent document of the malaria treatment trial into a multimedia tool integrating video, animations and audio narrations in three major Gambian languages. Acceptability and ease of use of the multimedia tool were assessed using quantitative and qualitative methods. In two separate visits, the participants’ comprehension of the study information was measured by using a validated digitised audio questionnaire. Results: The majority of participants (70%) reported that the multimedia tool was clear and easy to understand. Participants had high scores on the domains of adverse events/risk, voluntary participation, study procedures while lowest scores were recorded on the question items on randomisation. The differences in mean scores for participants’ ‘recall’ and ‘understanding’ between first and second visits were statistically significant (F (1,41)=25.38, p

This article is from Trials , volume 14 . Abstract None

This item represents a case in PACER, the U.S. Government's website for federal case data. If you wish to see the entire case, please consult PACER directly.

Introduction: A properly-designed informed consent form could help in the use and preservation of relevant information as well as enrich the worth of patient-physician dealings. This research sought to find out if informed consent forms used in health facilities in Benin City, Edo State contained the essential elements of informed consent. Methods: The study was carried out in 38 health facilities (3 public health facilities, and 35 private health facilities) in Benin City, the administrative headquarter of Edo State, South-south, Nigeria. A checklist was utilized to appraise informed consent documents used in these health facilities to determine their adequacy in terms of the critical elements contained in it. The checklist was developed based on the contents of the prototype form (proforma) provided by the Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria (MDCN). The checklist consisted of “Yes” and “No” sections corresponding to the 16 items considered necessary for valid consent documentation. Results: None of the consent forms in public health facilities had a notation that the benefits of proposed management or procedure were clarified, that the patient clearly understood the language of presentation or that the choice to ruminate on the procedure for a while prior to giving assent was offered to the patient. Only 11.4% of forms examined in private health facilities had a notation that the benefits and risk of the intended management option or procedure were explained to the patient. Conclusion: Many consent forms currently in use in health facilities in Benin City did not wholly adopt the contents of the proforma provided by the MDCN. Most informed consent documents examined in this study lacked the essential elements of informed consent. 

Perma.cc archive of https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543760/ created on 2022-08-08 15:25:35.187749+00:00.

Perma.cc archive of https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543760/ created on 2022-08-08 15:25:35.187749+00:00.

Perma.cc archive of https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543760/ created on 2022-08-08 15:25:35.187749+00:00.

Philip Morris Records; email

Philip Morris Records; email

Perma.cc archive of https://www.ictinc.ca/free-prior-informed-consent created on 2021-12-21 05:10:29+00:00.

A Vermont school injected a student with a COVID-19 shot without parental consent and the state supreme court ruled against the parents. Guest John Klar--attorney, farmer, and author of  Small Farm Republic --discusses the Vermont Supreme Court's decision in Politella v. Windham Southeast School District. Reference Links https://informedchoicewa.substack.com/ https://www.smallfarmrepublic.com/ https://brownstone.org/articles/vermont-supreme-court-sacrifices-children-to-big-pharma/

Guest: Owain Tudor | Director of the company called EIDO. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00238-019-01610-1 Suspected breast implant rupture: our experience, recommendations on its management and a proposal for a model of informed consent. Zingaretti N, Fasano D, Preis FW, Moreschi C, Ricci S, Massarut S, De Francesco F, Parodi PC. European Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2019 Dec 20:1-8.

This item represents a case in PACER, the U.S. Government's website for federal case data. If you wish to see the entire case, please consult PACER directly.

Informed consent (Medical law)

Introduction: Informed consent in the acute care setting is challenging for a variety of reasons. There are many studies evaluating approaches to informed consent in this setting, but to date there is not a review of this literature. The objective of this scoping review is to synthesize evidence regarding experiences and outcomes of informed consent processes for research in the acute care setting to clarify baseline expectations and norms. A secondary objective is to identify and delineate additional metrics (beyond understanding) that can be used to assess success related to informed consent processes in this setting. Methods and Analysis: This review will be conducted using JBI methodological guidance. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus will be searched. Studies in a language other than English or published prior to the year 2000 will be excluded. A pilot pre-screening round was conducted. Two team members will participate in each stage of screening and extraction. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.

Introduction: Informed consent in the acute care setting is challenging for a variety of reasons. There are many studies evaluating approaches to informed consent in this setting, but to date there is not a review of this literature. The objective of this scoping review is to synthesize evidence regarding experiences and outcomes of informed consent processes for research in the acute care setting to clarify baseline expectations and norms. A secondary objective is to identify and delineate additional metrics (beyond understanding) that can be used to assess success related to informed consent processes in this setting. Methods and Analysis: This review will be conducted using JBI methodological guidance. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus will be searched. Studies in a language other than English or published prior to the year 2000 will be excluded. A pilot pre-screening round was conducted. Two team members will participate in each stage of screening and extraction. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.

Introduction: Informed consent in the acute care setting is challenging for a variety of reasons. There are many studies evaluating approaches to informed consent in this setting, but to date there is not a review of this literature. The objective of this scoping review is to synthesize evidence regarding experiences and outcomes of informed consent processes for research in the acute care setting to clarify baseline expectations and norms. A secondary objective is to identify and delineate additional metrics (beyond understanding) that can be used to assess success related to informed consent processes in this setting. Methods and Analysis: This review will be conducted using JBI methodological guidance. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus will be searched. Studies in a language other than English or published prior to the year 2000 will be excluded. A pilot pre-screening round was conducted. Two team members will participate in each stage of screening and extraction. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.

In the past years, research institutions have been performing an increasing number of studies online. Many of these studies use digital information forms as a key part of their consent procedure. However, past research has suggested that the majority of online participants retain little information from these digital information forms (Perrault and Keating, 2018). This raises questions of how informed these participants really are when they consent to participate in a study. It is vital that participants are informed of the ethical and privacy risks, data plans, and their basic rights when participating in online research, especially when participating in studies where a lack of understanding may lead to undesirable outcomes for both the participants and the researchers. As such, we wish to extend on previous research which examines ways in which altering the presentation of the information form can increase retention of this information in online participants. We wish to do this by answering the following question: Does increasing interactivity improve retention of information about a research study in prospective participants? Our objective is to add a knowledge question at the end of each section of the information form, and then measure if people in the high interactivity condition retain more information from the online form than people in the low interactivity condition. We intend to discuss the findings in two separate research papers which will be written by Florian Elez Reichwein and Ira Perricci under the guidance and supervision of Marije aan het Rot and Ineke Wessel. Additionally, results may be published as a peer-reviewed paper in an international journal.

In the past years, research institutions have been performing an increasing number of studies online. Many of these studies use digital information forms as a key part of their consent procedure. However, past research has suggested that the majority of online participants retain little information from these digital information forms (Perrault and Keating, 2018). This raises questions of how informed these participants really are when they consent to participate in a study. It is vital that participants are informed of the ethical and privacy risks, data plans, and their basic rights when participating in online research, especially when participating in studies where a lack of understanding may lead to undesirable outcomes for both the participants and the researchers. As such, we wish to extend on previous research which examines ways in which altering the presentation of the information form can increase retention of this information in online participants. We wish to do this by answering the following question: Does increasing interactivity improve retention of information about a research study in prospective participants? Our objective is to add a knowledge question at the end of each section of the information form, and then measure if people in the high interactivity condition retain more information from the online form than people in the low interactivity condition. We intend to discuss the findings in two separate research papers which will be written by Florian Elez Reichwein and Ira Perricci under the guidance and supervision of Marije aan het Rot and Ineke Wessel. Additionally, results may be published as a peer-reviewed paper in an international journal.

This item represents a case in PACER, the U.S. Government's website for federal case data. If you wish to see the entire case, please consult PACER directly.

This item represents a case in PACER, the U.S. Government's website for federal case data. This information is uploaded quarterly. To see our most recent version please use the source url parameter, linked below. To see the canonical source for this data, please consult PACER directly.

This item represents a case in PACER, the U.S. Government's website for federal case data. If you wish to see the entire case, please consult PACER directly.

Professor Jay Bhattacharya laments the death of 'informed consent' in his profession (medicine). ------------------------------------------ The author of The Great Barrington Declaration joined us in the heart of Fitzroy, Melbourne, for an unforgettable night of laughs and reality checks with a sold out audience. Other panel members include Prof. Ramesh Thakur and Prof. James Allan. Opening address: Prof Gigi Foster Welcome to Country: Bill Lang from Small Business Australia Human Rights Message: David Limbrick MP With a sold out audience, the night was full of laughs, reality checks and curly audience questions about mandates, lockdowns, The Science™, Tony Fauci, and Public Health disasters. It's USD9.99 to watch here: https://discernable.locals.com/post/2833083/stanfords-jay-bhattacharya-live-event Or for a free 2hr studio panel head over to: https://discernable.io/the-peoples-project-with-stanfords-jay-bhattacharya/

Covid-19 Vaccines:  Informed Consent Matters - Front Line Workers Testimony On Vaccinations April 22, 2001 THE FAIR USE NOTICE Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​ "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial.