Downloads & Free Reading Options - Results

High Field Open Versus Short Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Spine%3a A Randomized Controlled Comparison Of Image Quality. by Enders%2c Judith

Read "High Field Open Versus Short Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Spine%3a A Randomized Controlled Comparison Of Image Quality." by Enders%2c Judith through these free online access and download options.

Search for Downloads

Search by Title or Author

Books Results

Source: The Internet Archive

The internet Archive Search Results

Available books for downloads and borrow from The internet Archive

1High-Field Open Versus Short-Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Spine: A Randomized Controlled Comparison Of Image Quality.

By

This article is from PLoS ONE , volume 8 . Abstract Background: The purpose of the present study was to compare the image quality of spinal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed on a high-field horizontal open versus a short-bore MR scanner in a randomized controlled study setup. Methods: Altogether, 93 (80% women, mean age 53) consecutive patients underwent spine imaging after random assignement to a 1-T horizontal open MR scanner with a vertical magnetic field or a 1.5-T short-bore MR scanner. This patient subset was part of a larger cohort. Image quality was assessed by determining qualitative parameters, signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR), and quantitative contour sharpness. Results: The image quality parameters were higher for short-bore MR imaging. Regarding all sequences, the relative differences were 39% for the mean overall qualitative image quality, 53% for the mean SNR values, and 34–37% for the quantitative contour sharpness (P

“High-Field Open Versus Short-Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Spine: A Randomized Controlled Comparison Of Image Quality.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  High-Field Open Versus Short-Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Spine: A Randomized Controlled Comparison Of Image Quality.
  • Authors: ➤  
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 9.80 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 260 times, the file-s went public at Fri Oct 24 2014.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Animated GIF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVu - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - JPEG Thumb - JSON - Metadata - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find High-Field Open Versus Short-Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Spine: A Randomized Controlled Comparison Of Image Quality. at online marketplaces:


Top of Page

Buy “High Field Open Versus Short Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Spine%3a A Randomized Controlled Comparison Of Image Quality.” online:

Shop for “High Field Open Versus Short Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Spine%3a A Randomized Controlled Comparison Of Image Quality.” on popular online marketplaces.