Downloads & Free Reading Options - Results

On this episode of the podcast, we continue our discussion of Kant, this time focusing on ethics. We begin with a thought experiment that calls into question whether or not lying is morally justifiable if it results in preserving human life. Next, we discuss the nature of morality and question the validity of the sources from which we typically derive these concepts. Finally, we explore the strengths and weaknesses of Deontology and Consequentialism and find out that there isn't an easy answer when it comes to how human action should be judged. All this and more on the latest episode of Philosophize This! Support the show on Patreon! www.philosophizethis.org for additional content. Thank you for wanting to know more today than you did yesterday. :)

On this episode of the podcast, we continue our discussion of Kant, this time focusing on ethics. We begin with a thought experiment that calls into question whether or not lying is morally justifiable if it results in preserving human life. Next, we discuss the nature of morality and question the validity of the sources from which we typically derive these concepts. Finally, we explore the strengths and weaknesses of Deontology and Consequentialism and find out that there isn't an easy answer when it comes to how human action should be judged. All this and more on the latest episode of Philosophize This! Support the show on Patreon! www.philosophizethis.org for additional content. Thank you for wanting to know more today than you did yesterday. :)

On this episode of the podcast, we continue our discussion of Kant, this time focusing on ethics. We begin with a thought experiment that calls into question whether or not lying is morally justifiable if it results in preserving human life. Next, we discuss the nature of morality and question the validity of the sources from which we typically derive these concepts. Finally, we explore the strengths and weaknesses of Deontology and Consequentialism and find out that there isn't an easy answer when it comes to how human action should be judged. All this and more on the latest episode of Philosophize This! Support the show on Patreon! www.philosophizethis.org for additional content. Thank you for wanting to know more today than you did yesterday. :)

On this episode of the podcast, we continue our discussion of Kant, this time focusing on ethics. We begin with a thought experiment that calls into question whether or not lying is morally justifiable if it results in preserving human life. Next, we discuss the nature of morality and question the validity of the sources from which we typically derive these concepts. Finally, we explore the strengths and weaknesses of Deontology and Consequentialism and find out that there isn't an easy answer when it comes to how human action should be judged. All this and more on the latest episode of Philosophize This! Support the show on Patreon! www.philosophizethis.org for additional content. Thank you for wanting to know more today than you did yesterday. :)

On this episode of the podcast, we continue our discussion of Kant, this time focusing on ethics. We begin with a thought experiment that calls into question whether or not lying is morally justifiable if it results in preserving human life. Next, we discuss the nature of morality and question the validity of the sources from which we typically derive these concepts. Finally, we explore the strengths and weaknesses of Deontology and Consequentialism and find out that there isn't an easy answer when it comes to how human action should be judged. All this and more on the latest episode of Philosophize This! Support the show on Patreon! www.philosophizethis.org for additional content. Thank you for wanting to know more today than you did yesterday. :)

Perma.cc archive of https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/consequentialism created on 2022-03-18 11:00:18.980484+00:00.

Perma.cc archive of https://iep.utm.edu/conseque/ created on 2022-01-25 18:26:49.126189+00:00.

Perma.cc archive of http://www.noelsemple.ca/2020/07/welfare-consequentialism-a-vaccine-for-populism/#more-810 created on 2022-08-24 14:16:22.228155+00:00.

I reckon most of us have heard about toxic behaviour in our hobby. Some of us will have experienced it directly. Many of us can probably name at least one bad actor who is still present in our community. There are also publishers who still work with these people, despite there having been public outrage about the person's behaviour or actions and the person not showing any remorse or accepting any responsibility. As a reviewer, my initial reaction is not to review games from those publishers, let alone if a toxic person has worked on them in any capacity. However, as I want to discuss in this article, things aren't always that black and white. Read the full article here: https://tabletopgamesblog.com/2023/09/12/reviews-bad-actors-and-consequentialism-reviewing-games-from-controversial-publishers-topic-discussion/ Intro Music: Bomber (Sting) by Riot ( ?????????????????????????https://www.youtube.com/audiolibrary/????????????????????????? ) Music by AShamaluevMusic. Website:  https://www.ashamaluevmusic.com Patreon: ?????????????????????????https://www.patreon.com/tabletopgamesblog????????????????????????? Ko-Fi: ?????????????????????????https://ko-fi.com/TabletopGamesBlog????????????????????????? Website: ?????????????????????????https://tabletopgamesblog.com/??????????????? (Photo by Kenny Eliason on Unsplash) --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/tabletopgamesblog/message

I reckon most of us have heard about toxic behaviour in our hobby. Some of us will have experienced it directly. Many of us can probably name at least one bad actor who is still present in our community. There are also publishers who still work with these people, despite there having been public outrage about the person's behaviour or actions and the person not showing any remorse or accepting any responsibility. As a reviewer, my initial reaction is not to review games from those publishers, let alone if a toxic person has worked on them in any capacity. However, as I want to discuss in this article, things aren't always that black and white. Read the full article here: https://tabletopgamesblog.com/2023/09/12/reviews-bad-actors-and-consequentialism-reviewing-games-from-controversial-publishers-topic-discussion/ Intro Music: Bomber (Sting) by Riot ( ?????????????????????????https://www.youtube.com/audiolibrary/????????????????????????? ) Music by AShamaluevMusic. Website:  https://www.ashamaluevmusic.com Patreon: ?????????????????????????https://www.patreon.com/tabletopgamesblog????????????????????????? Ko-Fi: ?????????????????????????https://ko-fi.com/TabletopGamesBlog????????????????????????? Website: ?????????????????????????https://tabletopgamesblog.com/??????????????? (Photo by Kenny Eliason on Unsplash) --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/tabletopgamesblog/message

Perma.cc archive of https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2017/05/16/fetal-consequentialism-and-maternal-mortality/ created on 2022-07-18 14:59:57.862029+00:00.

Perma.cc archive of https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism-rule/#FulVerParRulCon created on 2022-10-01 21:17:20.907212+00:00.

#uregina120 - #70 - Consequentialism & Belief (part I).mp4

#uregina120 - #83 - Consequentialism & Belief 2 - Pragmatism.mp4

Perma.cc archive of https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/consequentialism/ created on 2022-04-13 04:27:38.915178+00:00.

In this survey experiment, we ask two major research questions: i Whether performance information or democratic values display larger explanatory power to citizens’ policy preferences ii Would their explanatory powers change when people have low trust in government?

In this survey experiment, we ask two major research questions: i Whether performance information or democratic values display larger explanatory power to citizens’ policy preferences ii Would their explanatory powers change when people have low trust in government?

Scientific Consequentialism:Potential Problems with an Outcome-Driven Paradigm for the Scientific Study of Indigenous Peoples. Full-text copies of Professor Williams' papers can be found at the following link: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Deborah_Williams30 For more information on this and other happenings at the college, visit http://www.jccc.edu.

Perma.cc archive of https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/consequentialism created on 2022-04-18 12:46:41.425057+00:00.

Perma.cc archive of https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism-rule/ created on 2021-11-16 15:14:53+00:00.

There are two broad schools of ethical theory: consequentialism and non-consequentialism. According to consequentialism, the right act is that act which has the best consequences. According to non-consequentialism, the rightness of an action is not solely determined by its consequences. (Though, most versions of non-consequentialism allow some ethical relevance of consequences). The most famous version of non-consequentialism is deontology, which holds that one has an absolute duty to obey certain rules. “Never kill an innocent person” or “never lie” are examples of such rules. Christianity is one form of deontology and the Ten Commandments represent one set of rules. Medical law exists at the intersection between consequentialism and deontology. Much of medical law is consequentialist in nature. However, having evolved from a set of Christian values and principles, it retains certain deontological characteristics. In particular, it retains a commitment in many jurisdictions to the Sanctity of Life Doctrine, though this is being shed or modified as assisted dying becomes legalised. In this chapter, we will begin by defining consequentialism, and contrasting it with deontology. We will describe some examples of the influence of consequentialism over current medical law. We will close by outlining the areas where consequentialism is at odds with current medical law and how medical law should evolve according to consequentialism.

Rule consequentialism (RC) holds that the rightness and wrongness of actions is determined by an ideal moral code, i.e., the set of rules whose internalization would have the best consequences. But just how many moral codes are there supposed to be? Absolute RC holds that there is a single morally ideal code for everyone, while Relative RC holds that there are different codes for different groups or individuals. I argue that Relative RC better meets the test of reflective equilibrium than Absolute RC. In particular, I contend that Relative RC is superior because it accommodates our convictions about costless benefits. Some have charged that Relative RC threatens our convictions about the generality of moral codes and that it leads inevitably to what Brad Hooker calls runaway relativism. I argue that Relative RC has principled reasons for stopping this imagined slide down the slippery slope.

Rule consequentialism (RC) holds that the rightness and wrongness of actions is determined by an ideal moral code, i.e., the set of rules whose internalization would have the best consequences. But just how many moral codes are there supposed to be? Absolute RC holds that there is a single morally ideal code for everyone, while Relative RC holds that there are different codes for different groups or individuals. I argue that Relative RC better meets the test of reflective equilibrium than Absolute RC. In particular, I contend that Relative RC is superior because it accommodates our convictions about costless benefits. Some have charged that Relative RC threatens our convictions about the generality of moral codes and that it leads inevitably to what Brad Hooker calls runaway relativism. I argue that Relative RC has principled reasons for stopping this imagined slide down the slippery slope.

Perma.cc archive of https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/consequentialism created on 2022-07-09 14:55:52.586086+00:00.

Perma.cc archive of https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/consequentialism created on 2022-07-09 14:55:52.586086+00:00.

Perma.cc archive of https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/consequentialism created on 2022-07-09 14:55:52.586086+00:00.

Perma.cc archive of https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/consequentialism created on 2022-07-09 14:55:52.586086+00:00.