Downloads & Free Reading Options - Results

A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man Made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band by Hodge%2c James W.

Read "A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man Made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band" by Hodge%2c James W. through these free online access and download options.

Search for Downloads

Search by Title or Author

Books Results

Source: The Internet Archive

The internet Archive Search Results

Available books for downloads and borrow from The internet Archive

1A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man-made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band

By

Radio frequency noise is often the limiting factor in the ability of a communications receiver to discern a desired signal from man made interference. The predominate man made radio noise source in the high frequency radio band is gap type breakdown discharges on electric power distribution lines. The International Radio Consultative Committee (CCIR) has published its Report 258 which predicts the level of man made radio noise in the business, residential, rural, and quiet rural environmental categories. This thesis compares field measurements of gap type breakdown discharge generated noise, made in the high and very high frequency radio bands, to CCIR Report 258 predictions. It is shown that CCIR noise-level predictions correspond to field measurements in the low end of the high frequency band. At higher frequencies the CCIR curve consistently predicts a lower noise level than was measured in the field. An explanation for the difference between field measurements and CCIR predictions is presented. A trend noticed in the noise amplitude versus receiver bandwidth data measurements is investigated and leads to the development of a receiver bandwidth adjustment matrix. Using this matrix the noise-power measurements made in one receiver bandwidth can be scaled to a different bandwidth.

“A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man-made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man-made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 321.22 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 147 times, the file-s went public at Sat May 04 2019.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Item Tile - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - Text PDF - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man-made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band at online marketplaces:


2DTIC ADA306572: A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man-Made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band.

By

Radio frequency noise is often the limiting factor in the ability of a communications receiver to discern a desired signal from man made interference. The predominate man made radio noise source in the high frequency radio band is gap type breakdown discharges on electric power distribution lines. The International Radio Consultative Committee (CCIR) has published its Report 258 which predicts the level of man made radio noise in the business, residential, rural, and quiet rural environmental categories. This thesis compares field measurements of gap type breakdown discharge generated noise, made in the high and very high frequency radio bands, to CCIR Report 258 predictions. It is shown that CCIR noise-level predictions correspond to field measurements in the low end of the high frequency band. At higher frequencies the CCIR curve consistently predicts a lower noise level than was measured in the field. An explanation for the difference between field measurements and CCIR predictions is presented. A trend noticed in the noise amplitude versus receiver bandwidth data measurements is investigated and leads to the development of a receiver bandwidth adjustment matrix. Using this matrix the noise-power measurements made in one receiver bandwidth can be scaled to a different bandwidth.

“DTIC ADA306572: A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man-Made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  DTIC ADA306572: A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man-Made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band.
  • Author: ➤  
  • Language: English

“DTIC ADA306572: A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man-Made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band.” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

Downloads Information:

The book is available for download in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 87.40 Mbs, the file-s for this book were downloaded 75 times, the file-s went public at Thu Mar 29 2018.

Available formats:
Abbyy GZ - Additional Text PDF - Archive BitTorrent - DjVuTXT - Djvu XML - Image Container PDF - JPEG Thumb - Metadata - OCR Page Index - OCR Search Text - Page Numbers JSON - Scandata - Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP - chOCR - hOCR -

Related Links:

Online Marketplaces

Find DTIC ADA306572: A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man-Made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band. at online marketplaces:


Buy “A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man Made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band” online:

Shop for “A Comparison Between Power Line Noise Level Field Measurements And Man Made Radio Noise Prediction Curves In The High Frequency Radio Band” on popular online marketplaces.