Description Of A Slave Ship (1789 Broadside And Diagram) - Info and Reading Options

The Internet Archive:

<p class="MsoNormal">"Description of a Slave Ship." <i>London: Printed by James Phillips.</i> George-Yard, Lombard-Street [London], 1789. Broadside. </p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Historical Context</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">This document was published in 1789 during a critical period of transatlantic abolitionist activism. Britain was at the center of the Atlantic slave trade, and this diagram of the slave ship <i>Brooks</i> became one of the most influential pieces of abolitionist propaganda. In the U.S., slavery was legally entrenched in the South, and the Constitution had recently gone into effect (1789), allowing the slave trade to continue until at least 1808. Amid growing abolitionist pressure in both Britain and the American North, this visual document provided irrefutable evidence of the horrors of the Middle Passage and the inhumane conditions aboard slave ships.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Core Issues Presented</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">This broadside challenges the morality and legality of the slave trade by exposing the cruel logistics of human commodification. It highlights the brutal overcrowding, the dehumanization of African captives, and the economic system that allowed for such conditions. It assumes a natural human right to dignity and life—clearly violated by the transatlantic trade—and critiques the complicity of merchants, lawmakers, and consumers.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Contemporary Viewpoints (at Time of Publication)</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">Abolitionists in Britain and America viewed this document as a rallying cry. They used it in parliamentary testimony and public lectures. Meanwhile, slave traders, Southern planters, and economic elites often defended slavery as a "necessary" institution for economic prosperity, denying or minimizing these atrocities. Some argued that enslaved people were treated “well” to protect cargo investments—an idea starkly contradicted by this diagram.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Modern Historiographical Interpretations</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">Modern historians see this broadside as a turning point in visual political advocacy—what some call <i>early human rights documentation</i>. It is studied in both African diaspora history and the history of propaganda. Some historians note how abolitionists used the power of empirical data and imagery to appeal to Enlightenment rationality and Christian morality, while others critique the lack of African voices in these depictions.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Relevance to Today’s Issues</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">The issues of systemic racism, mass incarceration, and racialized dehumanization are directly connected to this legacy. The diagram forces viewers to consider how economic systems justify the exploitation of human lives—an issue that persists today in modern slavery, human trafficking, and racial disparities in wealth and justice systems.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Why This Text Matters</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">This source viscerally conveys what it meant to commodify human life—something difficult to capture in secondary sources alone. It shows how space, silence, and suffering were built into the economics of slavery. It remains one of the most cited and reproduced documents in anti-slavery education for its clarity and impact.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Modern Reader Takeaway</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">Modern readers should ask: <i>What systems today treat people as disposable or purely economic assets?</i> How do visual images and statistics influence moral judgment? The text invites us to bear witness, not only to the past but to the mechanisms of dehumanization still present in the world.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>AP/IB Essay and Discussion Prompts</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <ul style="margin-top:0in;" type="disc"> <li class="MsoNormal"><b>DBQ Prompt</b>: Using this diagram and at least three additional sources, evaluate the impact of abolitionist visual media on the transatlantic anti-slavery movement.<p></p></li> <li class="MsoNormal"><b>Thematic Essay</b>: How did Enlightenment values influence the rhetoric and strategies of abolitionist movements in the Atlantic world?<p></p></li> <li class="MsoNormal"><b>Short Answer</b>: Explain how the image and text of the <i>Brooks</i> slave ship contributed to legislative and public debate about slavery in the late 18th century.<p></p></li> <li class="MsoNormal"><b>Discussion Prompt</b>: In what ways does visual evidence like this supplement or challenge written testimony about slavery?<p></p></li> </ul> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Rhetorical and Literary Style</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">The tone is factual, precise, and restrained—intentionally avoiding sensationalism. The use of dimensions, measurements, and logistics gives credibility while implicitly conveying moral horror. There’s a stark contrast between the bureaucratic tone and the inhumanity being described, which heightens the emotional impact.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Ethical and Philosophical Themes</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">This broadside confronts Enlightenment ideals of liberty, dignity, and justice. It expresses a moral philosophy rooted in universal human rights, directly challenging racial hierarchies and economic rationalizations. Freedom is implicitly defined as a natural state, with slavery as an unnatural and violent imposition.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Voices Included and Excluded</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">The primary voice is that of British abolitionists, particularly informed by ship logs and reports. Absent are the voices of the enslaved themselves. This silence reflects the legal and social structures that denied enslaved Africans literacy, legal standing, and public voice. Today, scholars aim to recover and elevate those silenced narratives through other means.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span><b>Statistical and Visual Evidence as Memory</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">This document uses ship measurements and diagrams to visually depict the inhuman conditions of the Middle Passage. Unlike personal memoirs, it appeals to logic and physical space to make its point. This approach made it harder to deny or ignore. It played a powerful role in shaping collective memory. Today, it is a lasting image of abolitionist truth-telling.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Role in Parliamentary Debate</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">The broadside was used in British Parliament to advocate for ending the slave trade. By presenting undeniable facts, it pressured lawmakers to act. Slave traders pushed back, claiming exaggeration or misrepresentation. Still, the document helped sway public opinion and policy. It was a model of using evidence in political reform.</p><p></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"> <hr size="2" width="100%" align="center" /> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><b>Moral and Economic Critique of Slavery</b></p><p><b></b></p><b></b> <p class="MsoNormal">The diagram challenges the idea that slavery was economically necessary or morally acceptable. It shows how profits came at the cost of human suffering. Abolitionists used it to reject claims of "kind treatment." Pro-slavery voices tried to dismiss it as rare or extreme. Yet the evidence forced moral reckoning in public discourse.</p><p></p>

Search for “Description Of A Slave Ship (1789 Broadside And Diagram)” downloads:

Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.

Find “Description Of A Slave Ship (1789 Broadside And Diagram)” in Libraries Near You:

Read or borrow “Description Of A Slave Ship (1789 Broadside And Diagram)” from your local library.

• The WorldCat Libraries Catalog: Find a copy of “Description Of A Slave Ship (1789 Broadside And Diagram)” at a library near you.