"Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity" - Information and Links:

Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity - Info and Reading Options


“Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity
  • Authors:

“Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity” Subjects and Themes:

Edition Identifiers:

  • Internet Archive ID: arxiv-1703.01725

AI-generated Review of “Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity”:


"Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity" Description:

The Internet Archive:

The content of today's social media is becoming more and more rich, increasingly mixing text, images, videos, and audio. It is an intriguing research question to model the interplay between these different modes in attracting user attention and engagement. But in order to pursue this study of multimodal content, we must also account for context: timing effects, community preferences, and social factors (e.g., which authors are already popular) also affect the amount of feedback and reaction that social-media posts receive. In this work, we separate out the influence of these non-content factors in several ways. First, we focus on ranking pairs of submissions posted to the same community in quick succession, e.g., within 30 seconds, this framing encourages models to focus on time-agnostic and community-specific content features. Within that setting, we determine the relative performance of author vs. content features. We find that victory usually belongs to "cats and captions," as visual and textual features together tend to outperform identity-based features. Moreover, our experiments show that when considered in isolation, simple unigram text features and deep neural network visual features yield the highest accuracy individually, and that the combination of the two modalities generally leads to the best accuracies overall.

Read “Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity”:

Read “Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity” by choosing from the options below.

Available Downloads for “Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity”:

"Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity" is available for download from The Internet Archive in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 5.87 Mbs, and the file-s went public at Sat Jun 30 2018.

Legal and Safety Notes

Copyright Disclaimer and Liability Limitation:

A. Automated Content Display
The creation of this page is fully automated. All data, including text, images, and links, is displayed exactly as received from its original source, without any modification, alteration, or verification. We do not claim ownership of, nor assume any responsibility for, the accuracy or legality of this content.

B. Liability Disclaimer for External Content
The files provided below are solely the responsibility of their respective originators. We disclaim any and all liability, whether direct or indirect, for the content, accuracy, legality, or any other aspect of these files. By using this website, you acknowledge that we have no control over, nor endorse, the content hosted by external sources.

C. Inquiries and Disputes
For any inquiries, concerns, or issues related to the content displayed, including potential copyright claims, please contact the original source or provider of the files directly. We are not responsible for resolving any content-related disputes or claims of intellectual property infringement.

D. No Copyright Ownership
We do not claim ownership of any intellectual property contained in the files or data displayed on this website. All copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights remain the sole property of their respective owners. If you believe that content displayed on this website infringes upon your intellectual property rights, please contact the original content provider directly.

E. Fair Use Notice
Some content displayed on this website may fall under the "fair use" provisions of copyright law for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, or educational purposes. If you believe any content violates fair use guidelines, please reach out directly to the original source of the content for resolution.

Virus Scanning for Your Peace of Mind:

The files provided below have already been scanned for viruses by their original source. However, if you’d like to double-check before downloading, you can easily scan them yourself using the following steps:

How to scan a direct download link for viruses:

  • 1- Copy the direct link to the file you want to download (don’t open it yet).
  • (a free online tool) and paste the direct link into the provided field to start the scan.
  • 2- Visit VirusTotal (a free online tool) and paste the direct link into the provided field to start the scan.
  • 3- VirusTotal will scan the file using multiple antivirus vendors to detect any potential threats.
  • 4- Once the scan confirms the file is safe, you can proceed to download it with confidence and enjoy your content.

Available Downloads

  • Source: Internet Archive
  • All Files are Available: Yes
  • Number of Files: 6
  • Number of Available Files: 6
  • Added Date: 2018-06-30 16:05:11
  • Scanner: Internet Archive Python library 1.7.0.dev2

Available Files:

1- Text PDF

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Text PDF
  • File Size: 0.01 Mbs
  • File Name: 1703.01725.pdf
  • Direct Link: Click here

2- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: 1703.01725_metadata.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

3- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: arxiv-1703.01725_files.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

4- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: arxiv-1703.01725_meta.sqlite
  • Direct Link: Click here

5- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: arxiv-1703.01725_meta.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

6- Archive BitTorrent

  • File origin: metadata
  • File Format: Archive BitTorrent
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: arxiv-1703.01725_archive.torrent
  • Direct Link: Click here

Search for “Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity” downloads:

Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.

Find “Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity” in Libraries Near You:

Read or borrow “Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity” from your local library.

Buy “Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity” online:

Shop for “Cats And Captions Vs. Creators And The Clock: Comparing Multimodal Content To Context In Predicting Relative Popularity” on popular online marketplaces.