An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted - Info and Reading Options
to which are prefixed the proceedings of the House on Mr. Peddle's petition : Part the First
By C. H. Walker, Stephen Lushington, William Peddle, Jennett Evans and Church of England. Province of Canterbury. Prerogative Court
"An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted" was published by Printed for S. Sweet and Messrs. Lancaster in 1828 - London, it has 79 pages and the language of the book is English.
“An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted” Metadata:
- Title: ➤ An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted
- Authors: C. H. WalkerStephen LushingtonWilliam PeddleJennett EvansChurch of England. Province of Canterbury. Prerogative Court
- Language: English
- Number of Pages: 79
- Publisher: ➤ Printed for S. Sweet and Messrs. Lancaster
- Publish Date: 1828
- Publish Location: London
“An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted” Subjects and Themes:
- Subjects: Trials, litigation - Trials (Perjury) - Trials (Extortion)
- People: C. H. Walker - Stephen Lushington (1782-1873) - William Peddle - Jennett Evans
- Places: England - Canterbury
Edition Specifications:
- Format: [electronic resource] :
- Pagination: 79 p.
Edition Identifiers:
- The Open Library ID: OL59533546M - OL43673915W
- Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) ID: 505985851
AI-generated Review of “An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted”:
Read “An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted”:
Read “An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted” by choosing from the options below.
Search for “An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted” downloads:
Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.
Find “An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted” in Libraries Near You:
Read or borrow “An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted” from your local library.
Buy “An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted” online:
Shop for “An exposition of the practices of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, (with a view to their reformation) as exemplified in the cause of Peddle v. Evans in a letter to Dr. Lushington, M.P., one of the advocates of this Court and junior advocate of the defendant, wherein his reported attack in Parliament upon the conduct and character of the writer and others connected with the presentation of Mr. Peddle's petition is refuted” on popular online marketplaces.
- Ebay: New and used books.