"A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction." - Information and Links:

A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction. - Info and Reading Options

"A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction." and the language of the book is English.


“A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.” Metadata:

  • Title: ➤  A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.
  • Author:
  • Language: English

Edition Identifiers:

  • Internet Archive ID: pubmed-PMC4154282

AI-generated Review of “A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.”:


"A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction." Description:

The Internet Archive:

This article is from <a href="//archive.org/search.php?query=journaltitle%3A%28Medical%20Journal%20of%20the%20Islamic%20Republic%20of%20Iran%29" rel="nofollow">Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran</a>, <a href="//archive.org/search.php?query=journaltitle%3A%28Medical%20Journal%20of%20the%20Islamic%20Republic%20of%20Iran%29%20AND%20volume%3A%2828%29" rel="nofollow">volume 28</a>.<h2>Abstract</h2>Background: Team-based learning (TBL) is a structured type of cooperative learning that has growing application in medical education. This study compares levels of student learning and teaching satisfaction for a neurology course between conventional lecture and team-based learning. Methods: The study incorporated 70 students aged 19 to 22 years at the school of rehabilitation. One half of the 16 sessions of the neurology course was taught by lectures and the second half with team-based learning. Teaching satisfaction for the teaching methods was determined on a scale with 5 options in response to 20 questions. Results: Significant difference was found between lecture-based and team-based learning in final scores (p<0.001). Content validity index of the scale of student satisfaction was 94%, and external and internal consistencies of the scale were 0.954 and 0.921 orderly (p<0.001). The degree of satisfaction from TBL compared to the lecture method was 81.3%. Conclusion: Results revealed more success and student satisfaction from team-based learning compared to conventional lectures in teaching neurology to undergraduate students. It seems that application of new teaching methods such as team-based learning could be effectively introduced to improve levels of education and student learning

Read “A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.”:

Read “A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.” by choosing from the options below.

Available Downloads for “A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.”:

"A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction." is available for download from The Internet Archive in "texts" format, the size of the file-s is: 6.44 Mbs, and the file-s went public at Mon Sep 29 2014.

Legal and Safety Notes

Copyright Disclaimer and Liability Limitation:

A. Automated Content Display
The creation of this page is fully automated. All data, including text, images, and links, is displayed exactly as received from its original source, without any modification, alteration, or verification. We do not claim ownership of, nor assume any responsibility for, the accuracy or legality of this content.

B. Liability Disclaimer for External Content
The files provided below are solely the responsibility of their respective originators. We disclaim any and all liability, whether direct or indirect, for the content, accuracy, legality, or any other aspect of these files. By using this website, you acknowledge that we have no control over, nor endorse, the content hosted by external sources.

C. Inquiries and Disputes
For any inquiries, concerns, or issues related to the content displayed, including potential copyright claims, please contact the original source or provider of the files directly. We are not responsible for resolving any content-related disputes or claims of intellectual property infringement.

D. No Copyright Ownership
We do not claim ownership of any intellectual property contained in the files or data displayed on this website. All copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights remain the sole property of their respective owners. If you believe that content displayed on this website infringes upon your intellectual property rights, please contact the original content provider directly.

E. Fair Use Notice
Some content displayed on this website may fall under the "fair use" provisions of copyright law for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, or educational purposes. If you believe any content violates fair use guidelines, please reach out directly to the original source of the content for resolution.

Virus Scanning for Your Peace of Mind:

The files provided below have already been scanned for viruses by their original source. However, if you’d like to double-check before downloading, you can easily scan them yourself using the following steps:

How to scan a direct download link for viruses:

  • 1- Copy the direct link to the file you want to download (don’t open it yet).
    • (a free online tool) and paste the direct link into the provided field to start the scan.
  • 2- Visit VirusTotal (a free online tool) and paste the direct link into the provided field to start the scan.
  • 3- VirusTotal will scan the file using multiple antivirus vendors to detect any potential threats.
  • 4- Once the scan confirms the file is safe, you can proceed to download it with confidence and enjoy your content.

Available Downloads

  • Source: Internet Archive
  • Internet Archive Link: Archive.org page
  • All Files are Available: Yes
  • Number of Files: 14
  • Number of Available Files: 14
  • Added Date: 2014-09-29 21:10:31
  • Scanner: Internet Archive Python library 0.7.2
  • PPI (Pixels Per Inch): 300
  • OCR: ABBYY FineReader 9.0

Available Files:

1- Text PDF

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Text PDF
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: PMC4154282-mjiri-28-5.pdf
  • Direct Link: Click here

2- Item Tile

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Item Tile
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: __ia_thumb.jpg
  • Direct Link: Click here

3- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: pubmed-PMC4154282_files.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

4- JSON

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: JSON
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: pubmed-PMC4154282_medline.json
  • Direct Link: Click here

5- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: pubmed-PMC4154282_meta.sqlite
  • Direct Link: Click here

6- Metadata

  • File origin: original
  • File Format: Metadata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: pubmed-PMC4154282_meta.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

7- DjVu

  • File origin: derivative
  • File Format: DjVu
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: PMC4154282-mjiri-28-5.djvu
  • Direct Link: Click here

8- Animated GIF

  • File origin: derivative
  • File Format: Animated GIF
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: PMC4154282-mjiri-28-5.gif
  • Direct Link: Click here

9- Abbyy GZ

  • File origin: derivative
  • File Format: Abbyy GZ
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: PMC4154282-mjiri-28-5_abbyy.gz
  • Direct Link: Click here

10- DjVuTXT

  • File origin: derivative
  • File Format: DjVuTXT
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: PMC4154282-mjiri-28-5_djvu.txt
  • Direct Link: Click here

11- Djvu XML

  • File origin: derivative
  • File Format: Djvu XML
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: PMC4154282-mjiri-28-5_djvu.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

12- Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP

  • File origin: derivative
  • File Format: Single Page Processed JP2 ZIP
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: PMC4154282-mjiri-28-5_jp2.zip
  • Direct Link: Click here

13- Scandata

  • File origin: derivative
  • File Format: Scandata
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: PMC4154282-mjiri-28-5_scandata.xml
  • Direct Link: Click here

14- Archive BitTorrent

  • File origin: metadata
  • File Format: Archive BitTorrent
  • File Size: 0.00 Mbs
  • File Name: pubmed-PMC4154282_archive.torrent
  • Direct Link: Click here

Search for “A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.” downloads:

Visit our Downloads Search page to see if downloads are available.

Find “A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.” in Libraries Near You:

Read or borrow “A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.” from your local library.

Buy “A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.” online:

Shop for “A Comparison Of Conventional Lecture And Team-based Learning Methods In Terms Of Student Learning And Teaching Satisfaction.” on popular online marketplaces.